Treatment of Adult Depression in the United States
- PMID: 27571438
- DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.5057
Treatment of Adult Depression in the United States
Erratum in
-
Typographical Error in Methods Section.JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Oct 1;176(10):1579. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.6486. JAMA Intern Med. 2016. PMID: 27695830 No abstract available.
Abstract
Importance: Despite recent increased use of antidepressants in the United States, concerns persist that many adults with depression do not receive treatment, whereas others receive treatments that do not match their level of illness severity.
Objective: To characterize the treatment of adult depression in the United States.
Design, setting, and participants: Analysis of screen-positive depression, psychological distress, and depression treatment data from 46 417 responses to the Medical Expenditure Panel Surveys taken in US households by participants aged 18 years or older in 2012 and 2013.
Main outcome and measures: Percentages of adults with screen-positive depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-2 score of ≥ 3) and adjusted odds ratios (AORs) of the effects of sociodemographic characteristics on odds of screen-positive depression; percentages with treatment for screen-positive depression and AORs; percentages with any treatment of depression and AORs stratified by presence of serious psychological distress (Kessler 6 scale score of ≥13); and percentages with depression treatment by health care professional group (psychiatrists, other health care professionals, and general medical providers); and type of depression treatment (antidepressants, psychotherapy, and both) all stratified by distress level.
Results: Approximately 8.4% (95% CI, 7.9-8.8) of adults screened positive for depression, of which 28.7% received any depression treatment. Conversely, among all adults treated for depression, 29.9% had screen-positive depression and 21.8% had serious psychological distress. Adults with serious compared with less serious psychological distress who were treated for depression were more likely to receive care from psychiatrists (33.4% vs 17.3%, P < .001) or other mental health specialists (16.2% vs 9.6%, P < .001), and less likely to receive depression care exclusively from general medical professionals (59.0% vs 74.4%, P < .001). They were also more likely to receive psychotherapy (32.5% vs 20.6%, P < .001), though not antidepressant medications (81.1% vs 88.6%, P < .001).
Conclusions and relevance: Most US adults who screen positive for depression did not receive treatment for depression, whereas most who were treated did not screen positive. In light of these findings, it is important to strengthen efforts to align depression care with each patient's clinical needs.
Comment in
-
Screening for Depression Through a Glass Darkly.JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Mar 1;177(3):446-447. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.9281. JAMA Intern Med. 2017. PMID: 28264116 No abstract available.
-
Screening for Depression Through a Glass Darkly.JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Mar 1;177(3):447. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.9284. JAMA Intern Med. 2017. PMID: 28264117 No abstract available.
-
Screening for Depression Through a Glass Darkly-Reply.JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Mar 1;177(3):447-448. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.9287. JAMA Intern Med. 2017. PMID: 28264123 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Trends in Serious Psychological Distress and Outpatient Mental Health Care of US Adults.JAMA Psychiatry. 2019 Feb 1;76(2):152-161. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.3550. JAMA Psychiatry. 2019. PMID: 30484838 Free PMC article.
-
National patterns in antidepressant medication treatment.Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009 Aug;66(8):848-56. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.81. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009. PMID: 19652124
-
National patterns in antidepressant treatment by psychiatrists and general medical providers: results from the national comorbidity survey replication.J Clin Psychiatry. 2008 Jul;69(7):1064-74. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v69n0704. J Clin Psychiatry. 2008. PMID: 18399725
-
The National Depressive and Manic-Depressive Association consensus statement on the undertreatment of depression.JAMA. 1997 Jan 22-29;277(4):333-40. JAMA. 1997. PMID: 9002497 Review.
-
Recent Developments in the Treatment of Depression.Behav Ther. 2019 Mar;50(2):257-269. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2019.01.002. Epub 2019 Jan 17. Behav Ther. 2019. PMID: 30824244 Review.
Cited by
-
How, Why and When: Nursing Staff's Experiences of Working With Suicide Risk Assessment Instruments.Nurs Open. 2024 Nov;11(11):e70068. doi: 10.1002/nop2.70068. Nurs Open. 2024. PMID: 39489496 Free PMC article.
-
Integrating mental health literacy into Chinese college student mental health education in the post-COVID-19 era.Front Public Health. 2024 Sep 26;12:1456579. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1456579. eCollection 2024. Front Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39399699 Free PMC article.
-
Relationship between the triglyceride-glucose index and depression in individuals with chronic kidney disease: A cross-sectional study from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005-2020.Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Sep 27;103(39):e39834. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000039834. Medicine (Baltimore). 2024. PMID: 39331934 Free PMC article.
-
Profile of individuals served and presumed coverage of Psychosocial Care Centers (CAPS) in Brazil: A study of the period 2013-2019.PLoS One. 2024 Sep 6;19(9):e0308274. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308274. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 39240960 Free PMC article.
-
Physical Exercise as an Intervention for Depression: Evidence for Efficacy and Mu-Opioid Receptors as a Mechanism of Action.Adv Neurobiol. 2024;35:221-239. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-45493-6_11. Adv Neurobiol. 2024. PMID: 38874725 Review.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
