Uses, misuses, new uses and fundamental limitations of magnetic resonance imaging in cognitive science

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016 Oct 5;371(1705):20150349. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0349.

Abstract

When blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) contrast functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was discovered in the early 1990s, it provoked an explosion of interest in exploring human cognition, using brain mapping techniques based on MRI. Standards for data acquisition and analysis were rapidly put in place, in order to assist comparison of results across laboratories. Recently, MRI data acquisition capabilities have improved dramatically, inviting a rethink of strategies for relating functional brain activity at the systems level with its neuronal substrates and functional connections. This paper reviews the established capabilities of BOLD contrast fMRI, the perceived weaknesses of major methods of analysis, and current results that may provide insights into improved brain modelling. These results have inspired the use of in vivo myeloarchitecture for localizing brain activity, individual subject analysis without spatial smoothing and mapping of changes in cerebral blood volume instead of BOLD activation changes. The apparent fundamental limitations of all methods based on nuclear magnetic resonance are also discussed.This article is part of the themed issue 'Interpreting BOLD: a dialogue between cognitive and cellular neuroscience'.

Keywords: brain function; cerebral blood volume; cortical layers; magnetic resonance imaging; myeloarchitecture; neuroanatomy.

Publication types

  • Review
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Brain / diagnostic imaging*
  • Brain / physiology
  • Brain Mapping / methods
  • Cognitive Neuroscience / instrumentation
  • Cognitive Neuroscience / methods*
  • Humans
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging / methods*
  • Oxygen / blood
  • Rats

Substances

  • Oxygen