Comment
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31273-9.
Epub 2016 Aug 29.
Invasive management of acute coronary syndromes
Affiliations
- PMID: 27585758
- PMCID: PMC5621638
- DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31273-9
Item in Clipboard
Comment
Invasive management of acute coronary syndromes
Lancet.
.
No abstract available
Conflict of interest statement
I declare no competing interests.
Comment on
-
Early invasive versus non-invasive treatment in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (FRISC-II): 15 year follow-up of a prospective, randomised, multicentre study.Lancet. 2016 Oct 15;388(10054):1903-1911. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31276-4. Epub 2016 Aug 29. Lancet. 2016. PMID: 27585757 Clinical Trial.
Similar articles
-
Timing of angiography with a routine invasive strategy and long-term outcomes in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: a collaborative analysis of individual patient data from the FRISC II (Fragmin and Fast Revascularization During Instability in Coronary Artery Disease), ICTUS (Invasive Versus Conservative Treatment in Unstable Coronary Syndromes), and RITA-3 (Intervention Versus Conservative Treatment Strategy in Patients With Unstable Angina or Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction) Trials.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Feb;5(2):191-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.10.016. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012. PMID: 22361604
-
Management of acute coronary syndromes.N Engl J Med. 2005 Dec 22;353(25):2714-8; author reply 2714-8; discussion 2714-8. N Engl J Med. 2005. PMID: 16379087 No abstract available.
-
Management of acute coronary syndromes.N Engl J Med. 2005 Dec 22;353(25):2714-8; author reply 2714-8; discussion 2714-8. N Engl J Med. 2005. PMID: 16379085 No abstract available.
-
Angioplasty for acute coronary syndromes.Annu Rev Med. 1993;44:465-79. doi: 10.1146/annurev.me.44.020193.002341. Annu Rev Med. 1993. PMID: 8476265 Review.
-
[Acute coronary syndrome: stages of diagnosis determining treatment policy].Ter Arkh. 2001;73(4):5-11. Ter Arkh. 2001. PMID: 11494448 Review. Russian. No abstract available.
References
-
- Wallentin L, Lagerqvist B, Husted S, Kontny F, Stahle E, Swahn E. Outcome at 1 year after an invasive compared with a non-invasive strategy in unstable coronary-artery disease: the FRISC II invasive randomised trial. FRISC II Investigators. Fast Revascularisation during Instability in Coronary artery disease. Lancet. 2000;356:9–16. - PubMed
-
- Fox KA, Poole-Wilson PA, Henderson RA, et al. Interventional versus conservative treatment for patients with unstable angina or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the British Heart Foundation RITA 3 randomised trial. Lancet. 2002;360:743–51. - PubMed
-
- Cannon CP, Weintraub WS, Demopoulos LA, et al. Comparison of early invasive and conservative strategies in patients with unstable coronary syndromes treated with the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1879–87. - PubMed
-
- Bavry AA, Kumbhani DJ, Rassi AN, Bhatt DL, Askari AT. Benefit of early invasive therapy in acute coronary syndromes: a meta-analysis of contemporary randomized clinical trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:1319–25. - PubMed
-
- O’Donoghue M, Boden WE, Braunwald E, et al. Early invasive vs conservative treatment strategies in women and men with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2008;300:71–80. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
