The rise and fall of infectious disease in a warmer world

F1000Res. 2016 Aug 19:5:F1000 Faculty Rev-2040. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.8766.1. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

Now-outdated estimates proposed that climate change should have increased the number of people at risk of malaria, yet malaria and several other infectious diseases have declined. Although some diseases have increased as the climate has warmed, evidence for widespread climate-driven disease expansion has not materialized, despite increased research attention. Biological responses to warming depend on the non-linear relationships between physiological performance and temperature, called the thermal response curve. This leads performance to rise and fall with temperature. Under climate change, host species and their associated parasites face extinction if they cannot either thermoregulate or adapt by shifting phenology or geographic range. Climate change might also affect disease transmission through increases or decreases in host susceptibility and infective stage (and vector) production, longevity, and pathology. Many other factors drive disease transmission, especially economics, and some change in time along with temperature, making it hard to distinguish whether temperature drives disease or just correlates with disease drivers. Although it is difficult to predict how climate change will affect infectious disease, an ecological approach can help meet the challenge.

Keywords: climate change; ecology; infectious disease.

Publication types

  • Review

Grants and funding

Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. government. EAM was funded by the National Science Foundation (DEB-1518681 and DEB-1640780) and the Stanford University Center for Innovation in Global Health and Woods Institute for the Environment.