Variation in Guideline Concordant Active Surveillance Followup in Diverse Urology Practices
- PMID: 27663459
- PMCID: PMC5315618
- DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.09.071
Variation in Guideline Concordant Active Surveillance Followup in Diverse Urology Practices
Abstract
Purpose: We examined the frequency of followup prostate specific antigen testing and prostate biopsy among men treated with active surveillance in the academic and community urology practices comprising MUSIC (Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative).
Materials and methods: MUSIC is a consortium of 42 practices that maintains a prospective clinical registry with validated clinical data on all patients diagnosed with prostate cancer at participating sites. We identified all patients in MUSIC practices who entered active surveillance and had at least 2 years of continuous followup. After determining the frequency of repeat prostate specific antigen testing and prostate biopsy, we calculated rates of concordance with NCCN Guidelines® recommendations (ie at least 3 prostate specific antigen tests and 1 surveillance biopsy) collaborative-wide and across individual practices.
Results: We identified 513 patients who entered active surveillance from January 2012 through September 2013 and had at least 2 years of followup. Among the 431 men (84%) who remained on active surveillance for 2 years 132 (30.6%) underwent followup surveillance testing at a frequency that was concordant with NCCN® (National Comprehensive Cancer Network®) recommendations. At the practice level, the median rate of guideline concordant followup was 26.5% (range 10% to 67.5%, p <0.001). Among patients with discordant followup, the absence of followup biopsy was common and not significantly different across practices (median rate 82.0%, p = 0.35).
Conclusions: Among diverse community and academic practices in Michigan, there is wide variation in the proportion of men on active surveillance who meet guideline recommendations for followup prostate specific antigen testing and repeat biopsy. These data highlight the need for standardized active surveillance pathways that emphasize the role of repeat surveillance biopsies.
Keywords: biopsy; prostate-specific antigen; prostatic neoplasms; quality improvement; watchful waiting.
Copyright © 2017 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures
Comment in
-
Editorial Comment.J Urol. 2017 Mar;197(3 Pt 1):625-626. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.09.138. Epub 2016 Nov 28. J Urol. 2017. PMID: 27908692 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Contemporary use of initial active surveillance among men in Michigan with low-risk prostate cancer.Eur Urol. 2015 Jan;67(1):44-50. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.08.024. Epub 2014 Aug 24. Eur Urol. 2015. PMID: 25159890
-
Active Surveillance as Initial Management of Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer: Data from the PURC.J Urol. 2019 May;201(5):929-936. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.10.018. J Urol. 2019. PMID: 30720692
-
Understanding the Performance of Active Surveillance Selection Criteria in Diverse Urology Practices.J Urol. 2015 Nov;194(5):1253-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.05.014. Epub 2015 May 14. J Urol. 2015. PMID: 25981805
-
Avoiding obsolescence in advanced prostate cancer management: a guide for urologists.BJU Int. 2015 Feb;115(2):188-97. doi: 10.1111/bju.12665. BJU Int. 2015. PMID: 25756134 Review.
-
Prostate-Specific Antigen-Based Screening for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Evidence Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [Internet].Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2018 May. Report No.: 17-05229-EF-1. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2018 May. Report No.: 17-05229-EF-1. PMID: 30085502 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
Use of expectant management based on prostate cancer risk and health status: How far are we from a risk-adapted approach?Urol Oncol. 2023 Jul;41(7):323.e17-323.e25. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.04.006. Epub 2023 May 5. Urol Oncol. 2023. PMID: 37149430 Free PMC article.
-
Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: Past, Current, and Future Trends.J Pers Med. 2023 Apr 3;13(4):629. doi: 10.3390/jpm13040629. J Pers Med. 2023. PMID: 37109015 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A vision for closing the evidence-practice gap in the management of low-grade prostate cancer.JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2023 Mar 1;7(2):pkad028. doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkad028. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2023. PMID: 37101361 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Time Trends and Variation in the Use of Active Surveillance for Management of Low-risk Prostate Cancer in the US.JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e231439. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.1439. JAMA Netw Open. 2023. PMID: 36862409 Free PMC article.
-
Development and External Validation of the STRATified CANcer Surveillance (STRATCANS) Multivariable Model for Predicting Progression in Men with Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer Starting Active Surveillance.J Clin Med. 2022 Dec 27;12(1):216. doi: 10.3390/jcm12010216. J Clin Med. 2022. PMID: 36615017 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Liu J, Womble PR, Merdan S, et al. Factors Influencing Selection of Active Surveillance for Localized Prostate Cancer. Urology. 2015 - PubMed
-
- Cooperberg MR, Carroll PR. Trends in Management for Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer, 1990–2013. JAMA. 2015;314:80–2. - PubMed
-
- Loeb S, Berglund A, Stattin P. Population based study of use and determinants of active surveillance and watchful waiting for low and intermediate risk prostate cancer. J Urol. 2013;190:1742–9. - PubMed
-
- Womble PR, Montie JE, Ye Z, et al. Contemporary use of initial active surveillance among men in Michigan with low-risk prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2015;67:44–50. - PubMed
-
- Miller DC, Gruber SB, Hollenbeck BK, et al. Incidence of initial local therapy among men with lower-risk prostate cancer in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98:1134–41. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
