A Review of the Carcinogenic Potential of Glyphosate by Four Independent Expert Panels and Comparison to the IARC Assessment
- PMID: 27677666
- DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2016.1214677
A Review of the Carcinogenic Potential of Glyphosate by Four Independent Expert Panels and Comparison to the IARC Assessment
Erratum in
-
Corrigendum.Crit Rev Toxicol. 2018 Nov;48(10):907-908. doi: 10.1080/10408444.2018.1522175. Epub 2018 Nov 30. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2018. PMID: 30499365 No abstract available.
Expression of concern in
-
Expression of Concern.Crit Rev Toxicol. 2018 Sep 26:1. doi: 10.1080/10408444.2018.1522786. Online ahead of print. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2018. PMID: 30256708 No abstract available.
-
Expression of Concern.Crit Rev Toxicol. 2018 Nov 30:1. doi: 10.1080/10408444.2018.1539570. Online ahead of print. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2018. PMID: 30499354 No abstract available.
Abstract
The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) published a monograph in 2015 concluding that glyphosate is "probably carcinogenic to humans" (Group 2A) based on limited evidence in humans and sufficient evidence in experimental animals. It was also concluded that there was strong evidence of genotoxicity and oxidative stress. Four Expert Panels have been convened for the purpose of conducting a detailed critique of the evidence in light of IARC's assessment and to review all relevant information pertaining to glyphosate exposure, animal carcinogenicity, genotoxicity, and epidemiologic studies. Two of the Panels (animal bioassay and genetic toxicology) also provided a critique of the IARC position with respect to conclusions made in these areas. The incidences of neoplasms in the animal bioassays were found not to be associated with glyphosate exposure on the basis that they lacked statistical strength, were inconsistent across studies, lacked dose-response relationships, were not associated with preneoplasia, and/or were not plausible from a mechanistic perspective. The overall weight of evidence from the genetic toxicology data supports a conclusion that glyphosate (including GBFs and AMPA) does not pose a genotoxic hazard and therefore, should not be considered support for the classification of glyphosate as a genotoxic carcinogen. The assessment of the epidemiological data found that the data do not support a causal relationship between glyphosate exposure and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma while the data were judged to be too sparse to assess a potential relationship between glyphosate exposure and multiple myeloma. As a result, following the review of the totality of the evidence, the Panels concluded that the data do not support IARC's conclusion that glyphosate is a "probable human carcinogen" and, consistent with previous regulatory assessments, further concluded that glyphosate is unlikely to pose a carcinogenic risk to humans.
Keywords: Glyphosate; Roundup; aminomethylphosphoric acid; cancer; genotoxicity; herbicide.
Similar articles
-
Genotoxicity Expert Panel review: weight of evidence evaluation of the genotoxicity of glyphosate, glyphosate-based formulations, and aminomethylphosphonic acid.Crit Rev Toxicol. 2016 Sep;46(sup1):56-74. doi: 10.1080/10408444.2016.1214680. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2016. PMID: 27677670
-
Glyphosate rodent carcinogenicity bioassay expert panel review.Crit Rev Toxicol. 2016 Sep;46(sup1):44-55. doi: 10.1080/10408444.2016.1214679. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2016. PMID: 27677669
-
On the International Agency for Research on Cancer classification of glyphosate as a probable human carcinogen.Eur J Cancer Prev. 2018 Jan;27(1):82-87. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000289. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2018. PMID: 27552246
-
Glyphosate toxicity and carcinogenicity: a review of the scientific basis of the European Union assessment and its differences with IARC.Arch Toxicol. 2017 Aug;91(8):2723-2743. doi: 10.1007/s00204-017-1962-5. Epub 2017 Apr 3. Arch Toxicol. 2017. PMID: 28374158 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Safety evaluation and risk assessment of the herbicide Roundup and its active ingredient, glyphosate, for humans.Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2000 Apr;31(2 Pt 1):117-65. doi: 10.1006/rtph.1999.1371. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2000. PMID: 10854122 Review.
Cited by 5 articles
-
The nitrate content of fresh and cooked vegetables and their health-related risks.PLoS One. 2020 Jan 9;15(1):e0227551. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227551. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 31917821 Free PMC article.
-
How Glyphosate Impairs Liver Condition in the Field Lizard Podarcis siculus (Rafinesque-Schmaltz, 1810): Histological and Molecular Evidence.Biomed Res Int. 2019 May 14;2019:4746283. doi: 10.1155/2019/4746283. eCollection 2019. Biomed Res Int. 2019. PMID: 31218226 Free PMC article.
-
Public Health and Independent Risk Assessment.Am J Public Health. 2019 Jul;109(7):978-980. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305142. Am J Public Health. 2019. PMID: 31166731 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Trends in the Use of Glyphosate Herbicide and Its Relevant Regulations in Taiwan: A Water Contaminant of Increasing Concern.Toxics. 2019 Jan 22;7(1):4. doi: 10.3390/toxics7010004. Toxics. 2019. PMID: 30678215 Free PMC article.
-
Organophosphorus Compounds at 80: Some Old and New Issues.Toxicol Sci. 2018 Mar 1;162(1):24-35. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfx266. Toxicol Sci. 2018. PMID: 29228398 Free PMC article. Review.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
