Stroke, Bleeding, and Mortality Risks in Elderly Medicare Beneficiaries Treated With Dabigatran or Rivaroxaban for Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation
- PMID: 27695821
- DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.5954
Stroke, Bleeding, and Mortality Risks in Elderly Medicare Beneficiaries Treated With Dabigatran or Rivaroxaban for Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation
Erratum in
-
Error in Graph Line Labels.JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Nov 1;176(11):1729. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.7319. JAMA Intern Med. 2016. PMID: 27749955 No abstract available.
Abstract
Importance: Dabigatran and rivaroxaban are non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants approved for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF). There are no randomized head-to-head comparisons of these drugs for stroke, bleeding, or mortality outcomes.
Objective: To compare risks of thromboembolic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), major extracranial bleeding including major gastrointestinal bleeding, and mortality in patients with nonvalvular AF who initiated dabigatran or rivaroxaban treatment for stroke prevention.
Design, setting, and participants: Retrospective new-user cohort study of 118 891 patients with nonvalvular AF who were 65 years or older, enrolled in fee-for-service Medicare, and who initiated treatment with dabigatran or rivaroxaban from November 4, 2011, through June 30, 2014. Differences in baseline characteristics were adjusted using stabilized inverse probability of treatment weights based on propensity scores. The data analysis was performed from May 7, 2015, through June 30, 2016.
Exposures: Dabigatran, 150 mg, twice daily; rivaroxaban, 20 mg, once daily.
Main outcomes and measures: Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for the primary outcomes of thromboembolic stroke, ICH, major extracranial bleeding including major gastrointestinal bleeding, and mortality, with dabigatran as reference. Adjusted incidence rate differences (AIRDs) were also estimated.
Results: A total of 52 240 dabigatran-treated and 66 651 rivaroxaban-treated patients (47% female) contributed 15 524 and 20 199 person-years of on-treatment follow-up, respectively, during which 2537 primary outcome events occurred. Rivaroxaban use was associated with a statistically nonsignificant reduction in thromboembolic stroke (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.65-1.01; P = .07; AIRD = 1.8 fewer cases/1000 person-years), statistically significant increases in ICH (HR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.20-2.26; P = .002; AIRD = 2.3 excess cases/1000 person-years) and major extracranial bleeding (HR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.32-1.67; P < .001; AIRD = 13.0 excess cases/1000 person-years), including major gastrointestinal bleeding (HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.23-1.59; P < .001; AIRD = 9.4 excess cases/1000 person-years), and with a statistically nonsignificant increase in mortality (HR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.00-1.32; P = .051; AIRD = 3.1 excess cases/1000 person-years). In patients 75 years or older or with CHADS2 score greater than 2, rivaroxaban use was associated with significantly increased mortality compared with dabigatran use. The excess rate of ICH with rivaroxaban use exceeded its reduced rate of thromboembolic stroke.
Conclusions and relevance: Treatment with rivaroxaban 20 mg once daily was associated with statistically significant increases in ICH and major extracranial bleeding, including major gastrointestinal bleeding, compared with dabigatran 150 mg twice daily.
Comment in
-
Comparing Non-Vitamin K Oral Anticoagulants: Where We Are Now.JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Nov 1;176(11):1672. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.6429. JAMA Intern Med. 2016. PMID: 27695820 No abstract available.
-
Bleeding risk higher with rivaroxaban than dabigatran for stroke prevention, head-to-head trial shows.BMJ. 2016 Oct 3;355:i5362. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i5362. BMJ. 2016. PMID: 27702757 No abstract available.
-
Dabigatran Compared With Rivaroxaban vs Warfarin.JAMA Intern Med. 2017 May 1;177(5):741-742. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.0554. JAMA Intern Med. 2017. PMID: 28460097 No abstract available.
-
Dabigatran Compared With Rivaroxaban vs Warfarin.JAMA Intern Med. 2017 May 1;177(5):742-743. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.0561. JAMA Intern Med. 2017. PMID: 28460098 No abstract available.
-
Dabigatran Compared With Rivaroxaban vs Warfarin.JAMA Intern Med. 2017 May 1;177(5):742. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.0564. JAMA Intern Med. 2017. PMID: 28460099 No abstract available.
-
Dabigatran Compared With Rivaroxaban vs Warfarin-Reply.JAMA Intern Med. 2017 May 1;177(5):743-744. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.0567. JAMA Intern Med. 2017. PMID: 28460105 No abstract available.
-
Dabigatran Compared With Rivaroxaban vs Warfarin-Reply.JAMA Intern Med. 2017 May 1;177(5):744. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.0571. JAMA Intern Med. 2017. PMID: 28460106 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Comparative Stroke, Bleeding, and Mortality Risks in Older Medicare Patients Treated with Oral Anticoagulants for Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.Am J Med. 2019 May;132(5):596-604.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2018.12.023. Epub 2019 Jan 9. Am J Med. 2019. PMID: 30639551
-
Direct Comparison of Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, and Apixaban for Effectiveness and Safety in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.Chest. 2016 Dec;150(6):1302-1312. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.07.013. Epub 2016 Sep 28. Chest. 2016. PMID: 27938741
-
Comparison of the short-term risk of bleeding and arterial thromboembolic events in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients newly treated with dabigatran or rivaroxaban versus vitamin K antagonists: a French nationwide propensity-matched cohort study.Circulation. 2015 Sep 29;132(13):1252-60. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.015710. Epub 2015 Jul 21. Circulation. 2015. PMID: 26199338 Free PMC article.
-
Bleeding outcomes associated with rivaroxaban and dabigatran in patients treated for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017 Jan 6;17(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12872-016-0449-2. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017. PMID: 28056795 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Real-World Setting Comparison of Nonvitamin-K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin-K Antagonists for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Stroke. 2017 Sep;48(9):2494-2503. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017549. Epub 2017 Jul 17. Stroke. 2017. PMID: 28716982 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparative Cardioprotective Effectiveness: NOACs vs. Nattokinase-Bridging Basic Research to Clinical Findings.Biomolecules. 2024 Aug 7;14(8):956. doi: 10.3390/biom14080956. Biomolecules. 2024. PMID: 39199344 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Direct factor Xa inhibitors and the risk of cancer and cancer mortality: A Danish population-based cohort study.PLoS Med. 2024 Jul 1;21(7):e1004400. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004400. eCollection 2024 Jul. PLoS Med. 2024. PMID: 38950074 Free PMC article.
-
Outcomes of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants for secondary prevention in ischemic stroke with atrial fibrillation.Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 29;14(1):9838. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-60660-z. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38684879 Free PMC article.
-
Development and Validation of an Intracranial Hemorrhage Risk Score in Older Adults with Atrial Fibrillation Treated with Oral Anticoagulant.Clin Epidemiol. 2024 Apr 17;16:267-279. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S438013. eCollection 2024. Clin Epidemiol. 2024. PMID: 38645475 Free PMC article.
-
Twice- or once-daily dosing of direct oral anticoagulants and gastrointestinal bleeding in patient with atrial fibrillation.Am Heart J Plus. 2022 Sep 9;22:100203. doi: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2022.100203. eCollection 2022 Oct. Am Heart J Plus. 2022. PMID: 38558905 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
