Effect of Hydrocortisone on Development of Shock Among Patients With Severe Sepsis: The HYPRESS Randomized Clinical Trial
- PMID: 27695824
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.14799
Effect of Hydrocortisone on Development of Shock Among Patients With Severe Sepsis: The HYPRESS Randomized Clinical Trial
Abstract
Importance: Adjunctive hydrocortisone therapy is suggested by the Surviving Sepsis Campaign in refractory septic shock only. The efficacy of hydrocortisone in patients with severe sepsis without shock remains controversial.
Objective: To determine whether hydrocortisone therapy in patients with severe sepsis prevents the development of septic shock.
Design, setting, and participants: Double-blind, randomized clinical trial conducted from January 13, 2009, to August 27, 2013, with a follow-up of 180 days until February 23, 2014. The trial was performed in 34 intermediate or intensive care units of university and community hospitals in Germany, and it included 380 adult patients with severe sepsis who were not in septic shock.
Interventions: Patients were randomly allocated 1:1 either to receive a continuous infusion of 200 mg of hydrocortisone for 5 days followed by dose tapering until day 11 (n = 190) or to receive placebo (n = 190).
Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was development of septic shock within 14 days. Secondary outcomes were time until septic shock, mortality in the intensive care unit or hospital, survival up to 180 days, and assessment of secondary infections, weaning failure, muscle weakness, and hyperglycemia (blood glucose level >150 mg/dL [to convert to millimoles per liter, multiply by 0.0555]).
Results: The intention-to-treat population consisted of 353 patients (64.9% male; mean [SD] age, 65.0 [14.4] years). Septic shock occurred in 36 of 170 patients (21.2%) in the hydrocortisone group and 39 of 170 patients (22.9%) in the placebo group (difference, -1.8%; 95% CI, -10.7% to 7.2%; P = .70). No significant differences were observed between the hydrocortisone and placebo groups for time until septic shock; mortality in the intensive care unit or in the hospital; or mortality at 28 days (15 of 171 patients [8.8%] vs 14 of 170 patients [8.2%], respectively; difference, 0.5%; 95% CI, -5.6% to 6.7%; P = .86), 90 days (34 of 171 patients [19.9%] vs 28 of 168 patients [16.7%]; difference, 3.2%; 95% CI, -5.1% to 11.4%; P = .44), and 180 days (45 of 168 patients [26.8%] vs 37 of 167 patients [22.2%], respectively; difference, 4.6%; 95% CI, -4.6% to 13.7%; P = .32). In the hydrocortisone vs placebo groups, 21.5% vs 16.9% had secondary infections, 8.6% vs 8.5% had weaning failure, 30.7% vs 23.8% had muscle weakness, and 90.9% vs 81.5% had hyperglycemia.
Conclusions and relevance: Among adults with severe sepsis not in septic shock, use of hydrocortisone compared with placebo did not reduce the risk of septic shock within 14 days. These findings do not support the use of hydrocortisone in these patients.
Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00670254.
Comment in
-
Evaluating Glucocorticoids for Sepsis: Time to Change Course.JAMA. 2016 Nov 1;316(17):1769-1771. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.13904. JAMA. 2016. PMID: 27695850 No abstract available.
-
In patients with severe sepsis, hydrocortisone did not prevent progression to septic shock.Ann Intern Med. 2017 Jan 17;166(2):JC10. doi: 10.7326/ACPJC-2017-166-2-010. Ann Intern Med. 2017. PMID: 28114466 No abstract available.
-
Less Is More for Steroids in Severe Sepsis and Oxygen for the Critically Ill, but Maybe Not When Searching for Pulmonary Embolism in Syncope.Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Dec 1;196(11):1473-1475. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201701-0245RR. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017. PMID: 29043839 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Effect of Sodium Selenite Administration and Procalcitonin-Guided Therapy on Mortality in Patients With Severe Sepsis or Septic Shock: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Sep 1;176(9):1266-76. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.2514. JAMA Intern Med. 2016. PMID: 27428731 Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of Vitamin C, Hydrocortisone, and Thiamine vs Hydrocortisone Alone on Time Alive and Free of Vasopressor Support Among Patients With Septic Shock: The VITAMINS Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA. 2020 Feb 4;323(5):423-431. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.22176. JAMA. 2020. PMID: 31950979 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of Early Vasopressin vs Norepinephrine on Kidney Failure in Patients With Septic Shock: The VANISH Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA. 2016 Aug 2;316(5):509-18. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.10485. JAMA. 2016. PMID: 27483065 Clinical Trial.
-
Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012.Crit Care Med. 2013 Feb;41(2):580-637. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827e83af. Crit Care Med. 2013. PMID: 23353941
-
Corticosteroids in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock in adults: a systematic review.JAMA. 2009 Jun 10;301(22):2362-75. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.815. JAMA. 2009. PMID: 19509383 Review.
Cited by
-
Critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency (CIRCI) - an overview of pathogenesis, clinical presentation and management.Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Nov 6;15:1473151. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1473151. eCollection 2024. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024. PMID: 39574948 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effect of Continuous Infusion vs Bolus Dose of Hydrocortisone in Septic Shock: A Prospective Randomized Study.Indian J Crit Care Med. 2024 Sep;28(9):837-841. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24793. Epub 2024 Aug 31. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2024. PMID: 39360201 Free PMC article.
-
Evolving Paradigms in Sepsis Management: A Narrative Review.Cells. 2024 Jul 9;13(14):1172. doi: 10.3390/cells13141172. Cells. 2024. PMID: 39056754 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Exploring the translational landscape of the long noncoding RNA transcriptome in acute respiratory distress syndrome: it is a long way to the top.Eur Respir Rev. 2024 Jun 26;33(172):240013. doi: 10.1183/16000617.0013-2024. Print 2024 Apr. Eur Respir Rev. 2024. PMID: 38925793 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Steroids in acute respiratory distress syndrome: A panacea or still a puzzle?World J Crit Care Med. 2024 Jun 9;13(2):91225. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v13.i2.91225. eCollection 2024 Jun 9. World J Crit Care Med. 2024. PMID: 38855281 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
