Importance of metabolic rate to the relationship between the number of genes in a functional category and body size in Peto's paradox for cancer
- PMID: 27703689
- PMCID: PMC5043308
- DOI: 10.1098/rsos.160267
Importance of metabolic rate to the relationship between the number of genes in a functional category and body size in Peto's paradox for cancer
Abstract
Elucidation of tumour suppression mechanisms is a major challenge in cancer biology. Therefore, Peto's paradox, or low cancer incidence in large animals, has attracted focus. According to the gene-abundance hypothesis, which considers the increase/decrease in cancer-related genes with body size, researchers evaluated the associations between gene abundance and body size. However, previous studies only focused on a few specific gene functions and have ignored the alternative hypothesis (metabolic rate hypothesis): in this hypothesis, the cellular metabolic rate and subsequent oxidative stress decreases with increasing body size. In this study, we have elected to explore the gene-abundance hypothesis taking into account the metabolic rate hypothesis. Thus, we comprehensively investigated the correlation between the number of genes in various functional categories and body size while at the same time correcting for the mass-specific metabolic rate (Bc). A number of gene functions that correlated with body size were initially identified, but they were found to be artefactual due to the decrease in Bc with increasing body size. By contrast, immune system-related genes were found to increase with increasing body size when the correlation included this correction for Bc. These findings support the gene-abundance hypothesis and emphasize the importance of also taking into account the metabolic rate when evaluating gene abundance-body size relationships. This finding may be useful for understanding cancer evolution and tumour suppression mechanisms as well as for determining cancer-related genes and functions.
Keywords: Peto's paradox; body size; cancer; functional analysis of genome; metabolic rate.
Figures
Similar articles
-
A metabolic perspective of Peto's paradox and cancer.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Jul 19;370(1673):20140223. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0223. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015. PMID: 26056367 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Solutions to Peto's paradox revealed by mathematical modelling and cross-species cancer gene analysis.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Jul 19;370(1673):20140222. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0222. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015. PMID: 26056366 Free PMC article.
-
Can Peto's paradox be used as the null hypothesis to identify the role of evolution in natural resistance to cancer? A critical review.BMC Cancer. 2015 Oct 24;15:792. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1782-z. BMC Cancer. 2015. PMID: 26499116 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cell size, body size and Peto's paradox.BMC Ecol Evol. 2022 Dec 13;22(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12862-022-02096-5. BMC Ecol Evol. 2022. PMID: 36513976 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Oxford and the Savannah: can the hippo provide an explanation for Peto's paradox?Clin Cancer Res. 2014 Feb 1;20(3):557-64. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-2010. Epub 2013 Oct 28. Clin Cancer Res. 2014. PMID: 24166913 Review.
Cited by
-
Kimura's Theory of Non-Adaptive Radiation and Peto's Paradox: A Missing Link?Biology (Basel). 2023 Aug 17;12(8):1140. doi: 10.3390/biology12081140. Biology (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37627024 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Exosomes in mammals with greater habitat variability contain more proteins and RNAs.R Soc Open Sci. 2017 Apr 26;4(4):170162. doi: 10.1098/rsos.170162. eCollection 2017 Apr. R Soc Open Sci. 2017. PMID: 28484642 Free PMC article.
-
What Animal Cancers teach us about Human Biology.Theranostics. 2021 May 3;11(14):6682-6702. doi: 10.7150/thno.56623. eCollection 2021. Theranostics. 2021. PMID: 34093847 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Kitano H. 2004. Biological robustness. Nat. Rev. Genet. 5, 826–837. (doi:10.1038/nrg1471) - DOI - PubMed
-
- Tian T, Olson S, Whitacre JM, Harding A. 2011. The origins of cancer robustness and evolvability. Integr. Biol. (Camb). 3, 17–30. (doi:10.1039/c0ib00046a) - DOI - PubMed
-
- Peto R, Roe FJ, Lee PN, Levy L, Clack J. 1975. Cancer and ageing in mice and men. Br. J. Cancer 32, 411–426. (doi:10.1038/bjc.1975.242) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Nunney L, Maley CC, Breen M, Hochberg ME, Schiffman JD. 2015. Peto's paradox and the promise of comparative oncology. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 370, 20140177 (doi:10.1098/rstb.2014.0177) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Caulin AF, Maley CC. 2011. Peto's paradox: evolution's prescription for cancer prevention. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26, 175–182. (doi:10.1016/j.tree.2011.01.002) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
