Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
, 538 (7624), 265-269

Formation of New Chromatin Domains Determines Pathogenicity of Genomic Duplications

Affiliations

Formation of New Chromatin Domains Determines Pathogenicity of Genomic Duplications

Martin Franke et al. Nature.

Abstract

Chromosome conformation capture methods have identified subchromosomal structures of higher-order chromatin interactions called topologically associated domains (TADs) that are separated from each other by boundary regions. By subdividing the genome into discrete regulatory units, TADs restrict the contacts that enhancers establish with their target genes. However, the mechanisms that underlie partitioning of the genome into TADs remain poorly understood. Here we show by chromosome conformation capture (capture Hi-C and 4C-seq methods) that genomic duplications in patient cells and genetically modified mice can result in the formation of new chromatin domains (neo-TADs) and that this process determines their molecular pathology. Duplications of non-coding DNA within the mouse Sox9 TAD (intra-TAD) that cause female to male sex reversal in humans, showed increased contact of the duplicated regions within the TAD, but no change in the overall TAD structure. In contrast, overlapping duplications that extended over the next boundary into the neighbouring TAD (inter-TAD), resulted in the formation of a new chromatin domain (neo-TAD) that was isolated from the rest of the genome. As a consequence of this insulation, inter-TAD duplications had no phenotypic effect. However, incorporation of the next flanking gene, Kcnj2, in the neo-TAD resulted in ectopic contacts of Kcnj2 with the duplicated part of the Sox9 regulatory region, consecutive misexpression of Kcnj2, and a limb malformation phenotype. Our findings provide evidence that TADs are genomic regulatory units with a high degree of internal stability that can be sculptured by structural genomic variations. This process is important for the interpretation of copy number variations, as these variations are routinely detected in diagnostic tests for genetic disease and cancer. This finding also has relevance in an evolutionary setting because copy-number differences are thought to have a crucial role in the evolution of genome complexity.

Comment in

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 118 PubMed Central articles

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Cell. 2014 Dec 18;159(7):1665-80 - PubMed
    1. Nat Genet. 2007 Jul;39(7 Suppl):S43-7 - PubMed
    1. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 Jun 23;43(11):5394-408 - PubMed
    1. Nat Methods. 2012 Mar 04;9(4):357-9 - PubMed
    1. Cell Rep. 2015 Feb 4;:null - PubMed

Supplementary concepts

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback