Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Oct 5;92(1):14-30.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.09.039.

Context Processing and the Neurobiology of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder

Affiliations
Review

Context Processing and the Neurobiology of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder

Israel Liberzon et al. Neuron. .

Abstract

Progress in clinical and affective neuroscience is redefining psychiatric illness as symptomatic expression of cellular/molecular dysfunctions in specific brain circuits. Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has been an exemplar of this progress, with improved understanding of neurobiological systems subserving fear learning, salience detection, and emotion regulation explaining much of its phenomenology and neurobiology. However, many features remain unexplained and a parsimonious model that more fully accounts for symptoms and the core neurobiology remains elusive. Contextual processing is a key modulatory function of hippocampal-prefrontal-thalamic circuitry, allowing organisms to disambiguate cues and derive situation-specific meaning from the world. We propose that dysregulation within this context-processing circuit is at the core of PTSD pathophysiology, accounting for much of its phenomenology and most of its biological findings. Understanding core mechanisms like this, and their underlying neural circuits, will sharpen diagnostic precision and understanding of risk factors, enhancing our ability to develop preventive and "personalized" interventions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Neural circuits within the Basolateral Complex (BLC) of the Amygdala. Altered functioning within BLC circuits has been implicated in the Abnormal Fear Learning model of PTSD (see text). Interrupted lines represent distal inputs to and outputs from BLC.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Brain regions of the Salience Network. Abnormal function within Salience Network regions is implicated in the Exaggerated Threat Detection model of PTSD (see text).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Brain regions involved in executive function and emotional regulation. Abnormal function in these regions has been implicated in the Diminished Executive Function and Emotional Regulation model of PTSD (see text).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Brain circuits involved in contextual processing functions. Abnormal function within these circuits is implicated in the Deficient Contextual Processing model of PTSD (see text). Information flow in this circuit includes Locus Coeruleus (LC) adrenergic neurons (shown in schematic but not visible in depicted brain slices).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Contextual processing abnormalities in the Single Prolonged Stress animal model of PTSD (Panels A and B) and in PTSD patients (Panels C, D and E). Panel A – Schematic depiction of the SPS paradigm, which involves multiple stressors delivered sequentially in one day and then a 7 day “rest” period, followed by fear conditioning, extinction and renewal testing. Panel B – data using this paradigm show abnormal fear renewal in SPS animals (seen on the right, in line graph and summary bar graph). Panel C – Schematic depiction (including screen shots) of the paradigm used to examine fear conditioning, extinction, extinction recall and fear renewal in fMRI experiments with humans. Panels D and E – data using this paradigm with PTSD patients and combat control (CC) subjects show abnormal extinction recall (D) and abnormal fear renewal (E) in PTSD (skin conductance data shown on right in both panels). Differences in fMRI activations in PTSD compared to controls, in response to previously conditioned and then extinguished stimuli (CS+E), are shown on the left in both panels.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aas M, Haukvik UK, Djurovic S, Tesli M, Athanasiu L, Bjella T, Hansson L, Cattaneo A, Agartz I, Andreassen OA, et al. Interplay between childhood trauma and BDNF val66met variants on blood BDNF mRNA levels and on hippocampus subfields volumes in schizophrenia spectrum and bipolar disorders. Journal of psychiatric research. 2014;59:14–21. - PubMed
    1. Admon R, Lubin G, Stern O, Rosenberg K, Sela L, Ben-Ami H, Hendler T. Human vulnerability to stress depends on amygdala’s predisposition and hippocampal plasticity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2009;106:14120–14125. [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t] - PMC - PubMed
    1. Agorastos A, Boel JA, Heppner PS, Hager T, Moeller-Bertram T, Haji U, Motazedi A, Yanagi MA, Baker DG, Stiedl O. Diminished vagal activity and blunted diurnal variation of heart rate dynamics in posttraumatic stress disorder. Stress. 2013;16:300–310. - PubMed
    1. Aizenberg M, Geffen MN. Bidirectional effects of aversive learning on perceptual acuity are mediated by the sensory cortex. Nat Neurosci. 2013;16:994–996. - PubMed
    1. Alvarez RP, Biggs A, Chen G, Pine DS, Grillon C. Contextual fear conditioning in humans: cortical-hippocampal and amygdala contributions. J Neurosci. 2008;28:6211–6219. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms