Capecitabine in Combination with Standard (Neo)Adjuvant Regimens in Early Breast Cancer: Survival Outcome from a Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
- PMID: 27741288
- PMCID: PMC5065157
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164663
Capecitabine in Combination with Standard (Neo)Adjuvant Regimens in Early Breast Cancer: Survival Outcome from a Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Abstract
Capecitabine has been investigated in early breast cancer in several studies, but it was undefined that whether it could improve survival. To investigate whether the addition of capecitabine affected survival in patients with early breast cancer, a meta-analysis was conducted and overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and toxicity were assessed. The PubMed, Embase databases and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for studies between January 2006 and April 2016. Hazard ratios (HRs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs), or data for calculating HRs with 95% CI were derived. Seven trials with 9097 patients, consisted of 4 adjuvant and 3 neoadjuvant studies, were included in this meta-analysis. Adding capecitabine showed no improvement in DFS (HR = 0.93; 95% CI, 0.85-1.02; P = 0.12), whereas a significant improvement in OS was observed (HR = 0.85; 95% CI, 0.75-0.96; P = 0.008). A sub-analysis of DFS showed that benefit of capecitabine derived from patients with triple negative subtype and with extensive axillary involvement. Safety profiles were consistent with the known side-effects of capecitabine, but more patients discontinued scheduled treatment in the capecitabine group. Combining capecitabine with standard (neo)adjuvant regimens in early breast cancer demonstrated a significantly superior OS, and indicated DFS improvement in some subtypes with high risk of recurrence. Selection of subtypes was a key to identify patients who might gain survival benefit from capecitabine.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
Similar articles
-
The role of capecitabine-based neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Cancer. 2021 Jan 19;21(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-07791-y. BMC Cancer. 2021. PMID: 33468087 Free PMC article.
-
Capecitabine for hormone receptor-positive versus hormone receptor-negative breast cancer.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 May 26;5(5):CD011220. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011220.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 34037241 Free PMC article.
-
Capecitabine in early breast cancer: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.Eur J Cancer. 2017 May;77:40-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.02.024. Epub 2017 Mar 27. Eur J Cancer. 2017. PMID: 28355581 Review.
-
Additional capecitabine use in early-stage triple negative breast cancer patients receiving standard chemotherapy: a new era? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC Cancer. 2022 Mar 12;22(1):261. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09326-5. BMC Cancer. 2022. PMID: 35279130 Free PMC article.
-
Adjuvant addition of capecitabine to early-stage triple-negative breast cancer patients receiving standard chemotherapy: a meta-analysis.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Feb;179(3):533-542. doi: 10.1007/s10549-019-05513-4. Epub 2019 Dec 21. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020. PMID: 31865475 Review.
Cited by
-
The Clinical Value of Chemotherapy Combined With Capecitabine in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer-A Meta-Analysis.Front Pharmacol. 2021 Nov 15;12:771839. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.771839. eCollection 2021. Front Pharmacol. 2021. PMID: 34867401 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Optimal Management for Residual Disease Following Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy.Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2021 Jul 2;22(9):79. doi: 10.1007/s11864-021-00879-4. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2021. PMID: 34213636 Review.
-
Integrating Adjuvant Radiation with Post-Neoadjuvant Therapies in Early Breast Cancer.Curr Oncol Rep. 2021 Mar 26;23(5):58. doi: 10.1007/s11912-021-01050-w. Curr Oncol Rep. 2021. PMID: 33770260 Review.
-
The role of capecitabine-based neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Cancer. 2021 Jan 19;21(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-07791-y. BMC Cancer. 2021. PMID: 33468087 Free PMC article.
-
Post-neoadjuvant treatment and the management of residual disease in breast cancer: state of the art and perspectives.Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2019 Feb 25;11:1758835919827714. doi: 10.1177/1758835919827714. eCollection 2019. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2019. PMID: 30833989 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Wolmark N, Wang J, Mamounas E, Bryant J, Fisher B (2001) Preoperative chemotherapy in patients with operable breast cancer: nine-year results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2001: 96–102. - PubMed
-
- O'Shaughnessy J, Miles D, Vukelja S, Moiseyenko V, Ayoub JP, Cervantes G, et al. (2002) Superior survival with capecitabine plus docetaxel combination therapy in anthracycline-pretreated patients with advanced breast cancer: phase III trial results. J Clin Oncol 20: 2812–2823. - PubMed
-
- Joensuu H, Kellokumpu-Lehtinen PL, Huovinen R, Jukkola-Vuorinen A, Tanner M, Kokko R, et al. (2012) Adjuvant Capecitabine, Docetaxel, Cyclophosphamide, and Epirubicin for Early Breast Cancer: Final Analysis of the Randomized FinXX Trial. J Clin Oncol 30: 11–18. 10.1200/JCO.2011.35.4639 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
