Sponsorship of National Health Organizations by Two Major Soda Companies
- PMID: 27745783
- DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.08.010
Sponsorship of National Health Organizations by Two Major Soda Companies
Abstract
Introduction: Obesity is a pervasive public health problem in the U.S. Reducing soda consumption is important for stemming the obesity epidemic. However, several articles and one book suggest that soda companies are using their resources to impede public health interventions that might reduce soda consumption. Although corporate sponsorship by tobacco and alcohol companies has been studied extensively, there has been no systematic attempt to catalog sponsorship activities of soda companies. This study investigates the nature, extent, and implications of soda company sponsorship of U.S. health and medical organizations, as well as corporate lobbying expenditures on soda- or nutrition-related public health legislation from 2011 to 2015.
Methods: Records of corporate philanthropy and lobbying expenditures on public health legislation by soda companies in the U.S. during 2011-2015 were found through Internet and database searches.
Results: From 2011 to 2015, the Coca-Cola Company and PepsiCo were found to sponsor a total of 95 national health organizations, including many medical and public health institutions whose specific missions include fighting the obesity epidemic. During the study period, these two soda companies lobbied against 29 public health bills intended to reduce soda consumption or improve nutrition.
Conclusions: There is surprisingly pervasive sponsorship of national health and medical organizations by the nation's two largest soda companies. These companies lobbied against public health intervention in 97% of cases, calling into question a sincere commitment to improving the public's health. By accepting funding from these companies, health organizations are inadvertently participating in their marketing plans.
Copyright © 2016 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Public Meets Private: Conversations Between Coca-Cola and the CDC.Milbank Q. 2019 Mar;97(1):74-90. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12368. Epub 2019 Jan 29. Milbank Q. 2019. PMID: 30693564 Free PMC article.
-
Research partnerships between Coca-Cola and health organizations in Spain.Eur J Public Health. 2019 Oct 1;29(5):810-815. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cky175. Eur J Public Health. 2019. PMID: 30169613
-
Lobbying and advocacy for the public's health: what are the limits for nonprofit organizations?Am J Public Health. 1999 Sep;89(9):1425-9. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.9.1425. Am J Public Health. 1999. PMID: 10474565 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Soda industry influence on obesity science and policy in China.J Public Health Policy. 2019 Mar;40(1):5-16. doi: 10.1057/s41271-018-00158-x. J Public Health Policy. 2019. PMID: 30626895
-
Science organisations and Coca-Cola's 'war' with the public health community: insights from an internal industry document.J Epidemiol Community Health. 2018 Sep;72(9):761-763. doi: 10.1136/jech-2017-210375. Epub 2018 Mar 14. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2018. PMID: 29540465 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by 15 articles
-
Conceptualizing the commercial determinants of dietary behaviors associated with obesity: A systematic review using principles from critical interpretative synthesis.Obes Sci Pract. 2021 Apr 5;7(4):473-486. doi: 10.1002/osp4.507. eCollection 2021 Aug. Obes Sci Pract. 2021. PMID: 34401205 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Sugary drinks taxation: industry's lobbying strategies, practices and arguments in the Brazilian Legislature.Public Health Nutr. 2022 Jan;25(1):170-179. doi: 10.1017/S136898002100149X. Epub 2021 Apr 6. Public Health Nutr. 2022. PMID: 33820589 Free PMC article.
-
The political economy of sugar-sweetened beverage taxation in Latin America: lessons from Mexico, Chile and Colombia.Global Health. 2021 Jan 5;17(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12992-020-00656-2. Global Health. 2021. PMID: 33402166 Free PMC article.
-
Lessons from Corporate Influence in the Opioid Epidemic: Toward a Norm of Separation.J Bioeth Inq. 2020 Jun;17(2):173-189. doi: 10.1007/s11673-020-09982-x. Epub 2020 Jul 13. J Bioeth Inq. 2020. PMID: 32661741 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring why global health needs are unmet by research efforts: the potential influences of geography, industry and publication incentives.Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 May 15;18(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00560-6. Health Res Policy Syst. 2020. PMID: 32414373 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
