Bullying has long been tolerated as a rite of passage among children and adolescents. There is an implication that individuals who are bullied must have “asked for” this type of treatment, or deserved it. Sometimes, even the child who is bullied begins to internalize this idea. For many years, there has been a general acceptance and collective shrug when it comes to a child or adolescent with greater social capital or power pushing around a child perceived as subordinate. But bullying is not developmentally appropriate; it should not be considered a normal part of the typical social grouping that occurs throughout a child's life. Although bullying behavior endures through generations, the milieu is changing. Historically, bulling has occurred at school, the physical setting in which most of childhood is centered and the primary source for peer group formation. In recent years, however, the physical setting is not the only place bullying is occurring. Technology allows for an entirely new type of digital electronic aggression, cyberbullying, which takes place through chat rooms, instant messaging, social media, and other forms of digital electronic communication. Composition of peer groups, shifting demographics, changing societal norms, and modern technology are contextual factors that must be considered to understand and effectively react to bullying in the United States. Youth are embedded in multiple contexts and each of these contexts interacts with individual characteristics of youth in ways that either exacerbate or attenuate the association between these individual characteristics and bullying perpetration or victimization. Recognizing that bullying behavior is a major public health problem that demands the concerted and coordinated time and attention of parents, educators and school administrators, health care providers, policy makers, families, and others concerned with the care of children, this report evaluates the state of the science on biological and psychosocial consequences of peer victimization and the risk and protective factors that either increase or decrease peer victimization behavior and consequences.
Copyright 2016 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
- The National Academies of SCIENCES • ENGINEERING • MEDICINE
- COMMITTEE ON THE BIOLOGICAL AND PSYCHOSOCIAL EFFECTS OF PEER VICTIMIZATION: LESSONS FOR BULLYING PREVENTION
- BOARD ON CHILDREN, YOUTH, AND FAMILIES
- COMMITTEE ON LAW AND JUSTICE
- The Scope of the Problem
- Individuals within Social Contexts
- Consequences of Bullying Behavior
- Preventive Interventions
- Law and Policy
- Future Directions for Research, Policy, and Practice
Examining the Intersection of Bullying and Physical Relationship Violence Among New York City High School Students.J Interpers Violence. 2017 Jan;32(1):49-75. doi: 10.1177/0886260515585532. Epub 2015 May 7. J Interpers Violence. 2017. PMID: 25952291
Differentiating youth who are bullied from other victims of peer-aggression: the importance of differential power and repetition.J Adolesc Health. 2014 Aug;55(2):293-300. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.02.009. Epub 2014 Apr 13. J Adolesc Health. 2014. PMID: 24726463 Free PMC article.
Do Family-Level Factors Associated With Bullying Perpetration and Peer Victimization Differ by Race? Comparing European American and African American Youth.J Interpers Violence. 2017 Jun 1:886260517714441. doi: 10.1177/0886260517714441. Online ahead of print. J Interpers Violence. 2017. PMID: 29294797
Peer victimization in adolescence: The nature, progression, and consequences of being bullied within a developmental context.J Adolesc. 2017 Feb;55:116-128. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.12.012. Epub 2017 Jan 9. J Adolesc. 2017. PMID: 28081521 Review.
Prevalence and correlates of bullying perpetration and victimization among school-aged youth with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review.Res Dev Disabil. 2016 Feb-Mar;49-50:181-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2015.11.015. Epub 2015 Dec 29. Res Dev Disabil. 2016. PMID: 26735707 Review.