Cross-modal impacts of anthropogenic noise on information use
- PMID: 27780055
- DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.08.064
Cross-modal impacts of anthropogenic noise on information use
Abstract
Anthropogenic noise is a global pollutant, and there is rapidly accumulating evidence of impacts on a range of animal taxa [1,2]. While many studies have considered how additional noise may affect information provision and use, they have focused on the masking and consequent alteration of acoustic signals and cues; so-called unimodal effects [3]. Using field-based experimental trials on habituated wild dwarf mongooses (Helogale parvula) [4], we combine sound playbacks and faecal presentations to demonstrate that anthropogenic noise can disrupt responses to information from different sensory modalities. The adaptive, stronger response exhibited towards predator faeces compared with control faeces in ambient-noise conditions was detrimentally affected by road-noise playback. Specifically, having taken longer to detect the faeces, the mongooses interacted less with the predator cue, did not show increased vigilance following its detection, and spent less time in the safe vicinity of a burrow refuge, thus suffering a potentially increased predation risk. Our results are the first to show that anthropogenic noise could alter responses to olfactory cues, strongly indicating the possibility of cross-modal impacts of noise pollution on information use [3].
Crown Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Anthropogenic noise alters dwarf mongoose responses to heterospecific alarm calls.Environ Pollut. 2017 Apr;223:476-483. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.01.049. Epub 2017 Jan 30. Environ Pollut. 2017. PMID: 28153414
-
Anthropogenic noise disrupts use of vocal information about predation risk.Environ Pollut. 2016 Nov;218:988-995. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.08.049. Epub 2016 Aug 29. Environ Pollut. 2016. PMID: 27595178
-
Experimental evidence for delayed post-conflict management behaviour in wild dwarf mongooses.Elife. 2021 Nov 2;10:e69196. doi: 10.7554/eLife.69196. Elife. 2021. PMID: 34725038 Free PMC article.
-
Pollution going multimodal: the complex impact of the human-altered sensory environment on animal perception and performance.Biol Lett. 2015 Apr;11(4):20141051. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2014.1051. Biol Lett. 2015. PMID: 25904319 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Anthropogenic noise and the bioacoustics of terrestrial invertebrates.J Exp Biol. 2019 Jun 19;222(Pt 12):jeb178749. doi: 10.1242/jeb.178749. J Exp Biol. 2019. PMID: 31217253 Review.
Cited by
-
Microhabitat conditions drive uncertainty of risk and shape neophobic responses in Trinidadian guppies, Poecilia reticulata.Ecol Evol. 2023 Sep 25;13(9):e10554. doi: 10.1002/ece3.10554. eCollection 2023 Sep. Ecol Evol. 2023. PMID: 37753307 Free PMC article.
-
Finding a home in the noise: cross-modal impact of anthropogenic vibration on animal search behaviour.Biol Open. 2019 Jul 10;8(7):bio041988. doi: 10.1242/bio.041988. Biol Open. 2019. PMID: 31292133 Free PMC article.
-
Anthropogenic noise impairs foraging for cryptic prey via cross-sensory interference.Proc Biol Sci. 2020 Apr 8;287(1924):20192951. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2019.2951. Epub 2020 Apr 8. Proc Biol Sci. 2020. PMID: 32259473 Free PMC article.
-
Traffic noise inhibits cognitive performance in a songbird.Proc Biol Sci. 2021 Feb 10;288(1944):20202851. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.2851. Epub 2021 Feb 3. Proc Biol Sci. 2021. PMID: 33529564 Free PMC article.
-
Anthropogenic noise interacts with the predation risk assessment in a free-ranging bird.Curr Zool. 2023 May 2;70(3):277-283. doi: 10.1093/cz/zoad019. eCollection 2024 Jun. Curr Zool. 2023. PMID: 39035757 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
