Bayesian Genomic Prediction with Genotype × Environment Interaction Kernel Models
- PMID: 27793970
- PMCID: PMC5217122
- DOI: 10.1534/g3.116.035584
Bayesian Genomic Prediction with Genotype × Environment Interaction Kernel Models
Abstract
The phenomenon of genotype × environment (G × E) interaction in plant breeding decreases selection accuracy, thereby negatively affecting genetic gains. Several genomic prediction models incorporating G × E have been recently developed and used in genomic selection of plant breeding programs. Genomic prediction models for assessing multi-environment G × E interaction are extensions of a single-environment model, and have advantages and limitations. In this study, we propose two multi-environment Bayesian genomic models: the first model considers genetic effects [Formula: see text] that can be assessed by the Kronecker product of variance-covariance matrices of genetic correlations between environments and genomic kernels through markers under two linear kernel methods, linear (genomic best linear unbiased predictors, GBLUP) and Gaussian (Gaussian kernel, GK). The other model has the same genetic component as the first model [Formula: see text] plus an extra component, F: , that captures random effects between environments that were not captured by the random effects [Formula: see text] We used five CIMMYT data sets (one maize and four wheat) that were previously used in different studies. Results show that models with G × E always have superior prediction ability than single-environment models, and the higher prediction ability of multi-environment models with [Formula: see text] over the multi-environment model with only u occurred 85% of the time with GBLUP and 45% of the time with GK across the five data sets. The latter result indicated that including the random effect f is still beneficial for increasing prediction ability after adjusting by the random effect [Formula: see text].
Keywords: Gaussian kernel; GenPred; Shared data resource; genomic selection; kernel GBLUP; marker × environment interaction; multi-environment.
Copyright © 2017 Cuevas et al.
Similar articles
-
Genomic-Enabled Prediction in Maize Using Kernel Models with Genotype × Environment Interaction.G3 (Bethesda). 2017 Jun 7;7(6):1995-2014. doi: 10.1534/g3.117.042341. G3 (Bethesda). 2017. PMID: 28455415 Free PMC article.
-
Genomic-Enabled Prediction Kernel Models with Random Intercepts for Multi-environment Trials.G3 (Bethesda). 2018 Mar 28;8(4):1347-1365. doi: 10.1534/g3.117.300454. G3 (Bethesda). 2018. PMID: 29476023 Free PMC article.
-
Genomic Prediction of Genotype × Environment Interaction Kernel Regression Models.Plant Genome. 2016 Nov;9(3). doi: 10.3835/plantgenome2016.03.0024. Plant Genome. 2016. PMID: 27902799
-
Genomic Selection in Plant Breeding: Methods, Models, and Perspectives.Trends Plant Sci. 2017 Nov;22(11):961-975. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2017.08.011. Epub 2017 Sep 28. Trends Plant Sci. 2017. PMID: 28965742 Review.
-
A guide for kernel generalized regression methods for genomic-enabled prediction.Heredity (Edinb). 2021 Apr;126(4):577-596. doi: 10.1038/s41437-021-00412-1. Epub 2021 Mar 1. Heredity (Edinb). 2021. PMID: 33649571 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Optimization of Multi-Generation Multi-location Genomic Prediction Models for Recurrent Genomic Selection in an Upland Rice Population.Rice (N Y). 2023 Sep 27;16(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12284-023-00661-0. Rice (N Y). 2023. PMID: 37758969 Free PMC article.
-
Genomic selection for salinity tolerance in japonica rice.PLoS One. 2023 Sep 27;18(9):e0291833. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291833. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37756295 Free PMC article.
-
Multi-trait and multi-environment genomic prediction for flowering traits in maize: a deep learning approach.Front Plant Sci. 2023 Aug 1;14:1153040. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1153040. eCollection 2023. Front Plant Sci. 2023. PMID: 37593046 Free PMC article.
-
Diversifying maize genomic selection models.Mol Breed. 2021 May 17;41(5):33. doi: 10.1007/s11032-021-01221-4. eCollection 2021 May. Mol Breed. 2021. PMID: 37309328 Free PMC article.
-
Partitioning the forms of genotype-by-environment interaction in the reaction norm analysis of stability.Theor Appl Genet. 2023 Apr 7;136(5):99. doi: 10.1007/s00122-023-04319-9. Theor Appl Genet. 2023. PMID: 37027025 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bonilla E., Chai K., Williams C., 2007. Multi-task Gaussian process prediction. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 20: 153–160.
-
- Burgueño J., Crossa J., Cornelius P. L., Yang R. C., 2008. Using factor analytic models for joining environments and genotypes without crossover genotype × environment interactions. Crop Sci. 48(4): 1291.
-
- Burgueño J., Crossa J., Cotes J. M., San Vicente F., Das B., 2011. Prediction assessment of linear mixed models for multivariate trials. Crop Sci. 51: 944–954.
-
- Burgueño J., de los Campos G., Weigel K., Crossa J., 2012. Genomic prediction of breeding values when modeling genotype × environment interaction using pedigree and dense molecular markers. Crop Sci. 52: 707–719.
-
- Cornelius P., Crossa J., Seyedsadr M., 1996. Statistical test and estimators of multiplicative models for genotype-by-environment interaction, pp. 199–234 in Genotype-by-Environment Interaction, edited by Gauch H. G., Kang M. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL..
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources