Checkpoint recovery is integral to a successful checkpoint response. Checkpoint pathways monitor progress during cell division so that in the event of an error, the checkpoint is activated to block the cell cycle and activate repair pathways. Intrinsic to this process is that once repair has been achieved, the checkpoint signaling pathway is inactivated and cell cycle progression resumes. We use the term "checkpoint recovery" to describe the pathways responsible for the inactivation of checkpoint signaling and cell cycle re-entry after the initial stress has been alleviated. The DNA replication or S-phase checkpoint monitors the integrity of DNA synthesis. When replication stress is encountered, replication forks are stalled, and the checkpoint signaling pathway is activated. Central to recovery from the S-phase checkpoint is the restart of stalled replication forks. If checkpoint recovery fails, stalled forks may become unstable and lead to DNA breaks or unusual DNA structures that are difficult to resolve, causing genomic instability. Alternatively, if cell cycle resumption mechanisms become uncoupled from checkpoint inactivation, cells with under-replicated DNA might proceed through the cell cycle, also diminishing genomic stability. In this review, we discuss the molecular mechanisms that contribute to inactivation of the S-phase checkpoint signaling pathway and the restart of replication forks during recovery from replication stress.
Keywords: DNA replication; S-phase checkpoint; checkpoint recovery; fork restart.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funding sponsor had no role in the writing of the review manuscript.
Degradation of Mrc1 promotes recombination-mediated restart of stalled replication forks.Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 Mar 17;45(5):2558-2570. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw1249. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017. PMID: 27956499 Free PMC article.
The Intra-S Checkpoint Responses to DNA Damage.Genes (Basel). 2017 Feb 17;8(2):74. doi: 10.3390/genes8020074. Genes (Basel). 2017. PMID: 28218681 Free PMC article. Review.
Interplay of replication checkpoints and repair proteins at stalled replication forks.DNA Repair (Amst). 2007 Jul 1;6(7):994-1003. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2007.02.018. Epub 2007 Mar 26. DNA Repair (Amst). 2007. PMID: 17382606 Review.
TopBP1 and DNA polymerase alpha-mediated recruitment of the 9-1-1 complex to stalled replication forks: implications for a replication restart-based mechanism for ATR checkpoint activation.Cell Cycle. 2009 Sep 15;8(18):2877-84. doi: 10.4161/cc.8.18.9485. Epub 2009 Sep 9. Cell Cycle. 2009. PMID: 19652550 Review.
Orchestration of the S-phase and DNA damage checkpoint pathways by replication forks from early origins.J Cell Biol. 2008 Mar 24;180(6):1073-86. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200706009. Epub 2008 Mar 17. J Cell Biol. 2008. PMID: 18347065 Free PMC article.
Cited by 6 articles
Oil-In-Water Microemulsions as Hosts for Benzothiophene-Based Cytotoxic Compounds: An Effective Combination.Biomimetics (Basel). 2018 Jun 16;3(2):13. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics3020013. Biomimetics (Basel). 2018. PMID: 31105235 Free PMC article.
DNA Damage Stress: Cui Prodest?Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Mar 1;20(5):1073. doi: 10.3390/ijms20051073. Int J Mol Sci. 2019. PMID: 30832234 Free PMC article. Review.
On the Interplay of the DNA Replication Program and the Intra-S Phase Checkpoint Pathway.Genes (Basel). 2019 Jan 29;10(2):94. doi: 10.3390/genes10020094. Genes (Basel). 2019. PMID: 30700024 Free PMC article. Review.
Role of MCM2-7 protein phosphorylation in human cancer cells.Cell Biosci. 2018 Jul 24;8:43. doi: 10.1186/s13578-018-0242-2. eCollection 2018. Cell Biosci. 2018. PMID: 30062004 Free PMC article. Review.
Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation associated changes in CTCF-chromatin binding and gene expression in breast cells.Biochim Biophys Acta Gene Regul Mech. 2018 Aug;1861(8):718-730. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2018.06.010. Epub 2018 Jul 5. Biochim Biophys Acta Gene Regul Mech. 2018. PMID: 29981477 Free PMC article.