Long-term Outcomes of the Western Australian Trial of Screening for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial
- PMID: 27802493
- DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.6633
Long-term Outcomes of the Western Australian Trial of Screening for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial
Abstract
Importance: Mortality from ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) remains high. The benefit of screening older men for AAAs needs to be assessed in a range of health care settings.
Objective: To assess the influence of screening for AAAs in men aged 64 to 83 years on mortality from AAAs.
Design, setting, and participants: This randomized clinical trial performed from April 1, 1996, through March 31, 1999, with a mean of 12.8 years of follow-up (range, 11.6-14.2 years) included a population-based sample from a single metropolitan region in Western Australia identified via the electoral roll. Data analysis was performed from June 1, 2015, to June 1, 2016.
Interventions: Randomization to an invitation to undergo ultrasonography of the abdominal aorta or a control group without invitation.
Main outcomes and measures: Surgery for and mortality from AAA.
Results: A total of 49 801 men aged 64 to 83 years were identified for the study. Men living too far from screening centers (n = 8671) or who died before invitation (n = 2650) were excluded, resulting in 19 249 men in the invited group and 19 231 controls (mean [SD] age, 72.5 [4.6] years; 95% white). Of 19 249 men invited for screening, 12 203 (63.4%) attended. There were more elective operations (536 vs 414, P < .001) and fewer ruptured AAAs (72 vs 99, P = .04) in the invited group compared with the control group. Overall, there were 90 deaths from AAAs in the invited group (mortality rate, 47.86 per 100 000 person-years; 95% CI, 38.93-58.84) and 98 in the control group (52.53 per 100 000 person-years; 95% CI, 43.09-64.03) for a rate ratio of 0.91 (95% CI, 0.68-1.21). For men aged 65 to 74 years, the AAA mortality rate in the invited group was 34.52 per 100 000 person-years (95% CI, 26.02-45.81) compared with 37.67 per 100 000 person-years (95% CI, 28.71-49.44) in the control group for a rate ratio of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.62-1.36). The number needed to invite for screening to prevent 1 death from an AAA in 5 years was 4784 for men aged 64 to 83 years and 3290 for men aged 65 to 74 years. There were no meaningful differences in all-cause, cardiovascular, and other mortality risks.
Conclusions and relevance: Use of the electoral roll to identify and invite men aged 64 to 83 years for screening for AAAs had no significant effect on the overall mortality from AAAs.
Trial registration: isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN16171472.
Comment in
-
The Last (Randomized) Word on Screening for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Dec 1;176(12):1767-1768. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.6663. JAMA Intern Med. 2016. PMID: 27802490 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Primary Care Screening for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.JAMA. 2019 Dec 10;322(22):2219-2238. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.17021. JAMA. 2019. PMID: 31821436
-
Screening women aged 65 years or over for abdominal aortic aneurysm: a modelling study and health economic evaluation.Health Technol Assess. 2018 Aug;22(43):1-142. doi: 10.3310/hta22430. Health Technol Assess. 2018. PMID: 30132754 Free PMC article.
-
Reconsidering gender relative to risk of rupture in the contemporary management of abdominal aortic aneurysms.J Vasc Surg. 2015 Dec;62(6):1429-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.07.079. Epub 2015 Sep 26. J Vasc Surg. 2015. PMID: 26409846
-
A systematic review of short-term vs long-term effectiveness of one-time abdominal aortic aneurysm screening in men with ultrasound.J Vasc Surg. 2018 Aug;68(2):612-623. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.03.411. J Vasc Surg. 2018. PMID: 30037679 Review.
-
What is the role of screening in the management of abdominal aortic aneurysms?Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012 Apr;14(4):399-405. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivr106. Epub 2012 Jan 19. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012. PMID: 22268069 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Prospective clinical evaluation of deep learning for ultrasonographic screening of abdominal aortic aneurysms.NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Oct 15;7(1):282. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01269-4. NPJ Digit Med. 2024. PMID: 39406888 Free PMC article. Review.
-
One-time screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in Ontario, Canada: a model-based cost-utility analysis.CMAJ. 2024 Feb 4;196(4):E112-E120. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.230913. CMAJ. 2024. PMID: 38316457 Free PMC article.
-
Association between the non-HDL-cholesterol to HDL- cholesterol ratio and abdominal aortic aneurysm from a Chinese screening program.Lipids Health Dis. 2023 Nov 6;22(1):187. doi: 10.1186/s12944-023-01939-4. Lipids Health Dis. 2023. PMID: 37932803 Free PMC article.
-
Epidemiology of age-, sex-, and race-specific hospitalizations for abdominal aortic aneurysms highlights gaps in current screening recommendations.J Vasc Surg. 2022 Nov;76(5):1216-1226.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.02.058. Epub 2022 Mar 9. J Vasc Surg. 2022. PMID: 35278654 Free PMC article.
-
Projection of global burden and risk factors for aortic aneurysm - timely warning for greater emphasis on managing blood pressure.Ann Med. 2022 Dec;54(1):553-564. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2022.2034932. Ann Med. 2022. PMID: 35139697 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous
