Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Nov 3:355:i5546.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.i5546.

Vasectomy and risk of prostate cancer: population based matched cohort study

Affiliations

Vasectomy and risk of prostate cancer: population based matched cohort study

Madhur Nayan et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To determine the association between vasectomy and prostate cancer, adjusting for measures of health seeking behaviour.

Design: Population based matched cohort study.

Setting: Multiple validated healthcare databases in Ontario, Canada, 1994-2012.

Participants: 326 607 men aged 20 to 65 who had undergone vasectomy were identified through physician billing codes and matched 1:1 on age (within two years), year of cohort entry, comorbidity score, and geographical region to men who did not undergo a vasectomy.

Main outcomes measures: The primary outcome was incident prostate cancer. Secondary outcomes were prostate cancer related grade, stage, and mortality.

Results: 3462 incident cases of prostate cancer were identified after a median follow-up of 10.9 years: 1843 (53.2%) in the vasectomy group and 1619 (46.8%) in the non-vasectomy group. In unadjusted analysis, vasectomy was associated with a slightly increased risk of incident prostate cancer (hazard ratio 1.13, 95% confidence interval 1.05 to 1.20). After adjustment for measures of health seeking behaviour, however, no association remained (adjusted hazard ratio 1.02, 95% confidence interval 0.95 to 1.09). Moreover, no association was found between vasectomy and high grade prostate cancer (adjusted odds ratio 1.05, 95% confidence interval 0.67 to 1.66), advanced stage prostate cancer (adjusted odds ratio 1.04, 0.81 to 1.34), or mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 1.06, 0.60 to 1.85).

Conclusion: The findings do not support an independent association between vasectomy and prostate cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: no support from any organisation for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Figures

None
Fig 1 Cumulative probability of incident prostate cancer by vasectomy status

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Farley TM, Meirik O, Mehta S, Waites GM. The safety of vasectomy: recent concerns. Bull World Health Organ 1993;71:413-9.pmid:8324861. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jacobstein R, Pile J. Vasectomy: safe, convenient, effective—and underutilized. Global Health Technical Briefs. 2005.
    1. Trussell J, Lalla AM, Doan QV, Reyes E, Pinto L, Gricar J. Cost effectiveness of contraceptives in the United States. Contraception 2009;79:5-14. 10.1016/j.contraception.2008.08.003 pmid:19041435. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jamieson DJ, Costello C, Trussell J, Hillis SD, Marchbanks PA, Peterson HB. US Collaborative Review of Sterilization Working Group. The risk of pregnancy after vasectomy. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:848-50. 10.1097/01.AOG.0000123246.11511.e4 pmid:15121555. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pile JM, Barone MA. Demographics of vasectomy--USA and international. Urol Clin North Am 2009;36:295-305. 10.1016/j.ucl.2009.05.006 pmid:19643232. - DOI - PubMed