Vasectomy and risk of prostate cancer: population based matched cohort study
- PMID: 27811008
- PMCID: PMC5094198
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i5546
Vasectomy and risk of prostate cancer: population based matched cohort study
Abstract
Objective: To determine the association between vasectomy and prostate cancer, adjusting for measures of health seeking behaviour.
Design: Population based matched cohort study.
Setting: Multiple validated healthcare databases in Ontario, Canada, 1994-2012.
Participants: 326 607 men aged 20 to 65 who had undergone vasectomy were identified through physician billing codes and matched 1:1 on age (within two years), year of cohort entry, comorbidity score, and geographical region to men who did not undergo a vasectomy.
Main outcomes measures: The primary outcome was incident prostate cancer. Secondary outcomes were prostate cancer related grade, stage, and mortality.
Results: 3462 incident cases of prostate cancer were identified after a median follow-up of 10.9 years: 1843 (53.2%) in the vasectomy group and 1619 (46.8%) in the non-vasectomy group. In unadjusted analysis, vasectomy was associated with a slightly increased risk of incident prostate cancer (hazard ratio 1.13, 95% confidence interval 1.05 to 1.20). After adjustment for measures of health seeking behaviour, however, no association remained (adjusted hazard ratio 1.02, 95% confidence interval 0.95 to 1.09). Moreover, no association was found between vasectomy and high grade prostate cancer (adjusted odds ratio 1.05, 95% confidence interval 0.67 to 1.66), advanced stage prostate cancer (adjusted odds ratio 1.04, 0.81 to 1.34), or mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 1.06, 0.60 to 1.85).
Conclusion: The findings do not support an independent association between vasectomy and prostate cancer.
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Conflict of interest statement
All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: no support from any organisation for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Association between vasectomy and risk of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis.Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2021 Dec;24(4):962-975. doi: 10.1038/s41391-021-00368-7. Epub 2021 Apr 29. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2021. PMID: 33927357 Review.
-
A prospective cohort study of vasectomy and prostate cancer in US men.JAMA. 1993 Feb 17;269(7):873-7. JAMA. 1993. PMID: 8426446
-
A retrospective cohort study of vasectomy and prostate cancer in US men.JAMA. 1993 Feb 17;269(7):878-82. JAMA. 1993. PMID: 8123059
-
The Association Between Vasectomy and Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Sep 1;177(9):1273-1286. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.2791. JAMA Intern Med. 2017. PMID: 28715534 Free PMC article.
-
Vasectomy and risk of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.Andrology. 2015 Jul;3(4):643-9. doi: 10.1111/andr.12040. Epub 2015 Jun 3. Andrology. 2015. PMID: 26041315 Review.
Cited by
-
Older veterans associated with reduced risk of cancer: Retrospective nationwide matched cohort study in Taiwan.Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Jan 4;9:931565. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.931565. eCollection 2022. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023. PMID: 36687435 Free PMC article.
-
Vasectomy and Risk of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Eur Urol Open Sci. 2022 May 19;41:35-44. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.04.012. eCollection 2022 Jul. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2022. PMID: 35633829 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Association between vasectomy and risk of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis.Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2021 Dec;24(4):962-975. doi: 10.1038/s41391-021-00368-7. Epub 2021 Apr 29. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2021. PMID: 33927357 Review.
-
Review of Vasectomy Complications and Safety Concerns.World J Mens Health. 2021 Jul;39(3):406-418. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.200073. Epub 2020 Jul 30. World J Mens Health. 2021. PMID: 32777870 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Circulating vitamin D concentration and risk of prostate cancer: a dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies.Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2018 Jan 9;14:95-104. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S149325. eCollection 2018. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2018. PMID: 29386901 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Farley TM, Meirik O, Mehta S, Waites GM. The safety of vasectomy: recent concerns. Bull World Health Organ 1993;71:413-9.pmid:8324861. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Jacobstein R, Pile J. Vasectomy: safe, convenient, effective—and underutilized. Global Health Technical Briefs. 2005.
-
- Trussell J, Lalla AM, Doan QV, Reyes E, Pinto L, Gricar J. Cost effectiveness of contraceptives in the United States. Contraception 2009;79:5-14. 10.1016/j.contraception.2008.08.003 pmid:19041435. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Jamieson DJ, Costello C, Trussell J, Hillis SD, Marchbanks PA, Peterson HB. US Collaborative Review of Sterilization Working Group. The risk of pregnancy after vasectomy. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:848-50. 10.1097/01.AOG.0000123246.11511.e4 pmid:15121555. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Pile JM, Barone MA. Demographics of vasectomy--USA and international. Urol Clin North Am 2009;36:295-305. 10.1016/j.ucl.2009.05.006 pmid:19643232. - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical