Estimating the intra- and inter-individual imprecision of manual pipetting

Clin Chem Lab Med. 2017 Jun 27;55(7):962-966. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2016-0810.

Abstract

Background: Despite the importance of manual pipetting of fluids such as water, solutions, buffers, reagents, or biological samples in daily laboratory practice, the intra- and inter-individual imprecision of this activity has not been recently described in scientific publications.

Methods: Twenty laboratory operators were randomly enrolled for this study. Imprecision of manual pipetting was estimated by asking each laboratory professional to dispense 1 mL, 100 μL or 10 μL of distilled water for 10 consecutive times with three certified pipettes into a 50-mL plastic container placed into a gravimetric balance. The weight of the water dispensed was systematically recorded for each of the 10 repeated attempts, and the inter- and intra-operator imprecision was finally calculated and expressed as coefficient of variation (CV%).

Results: The mean intra-individual imprecision was 5.7% (range, 0%-11.8%) for pipetting 10 μL, 0.8% (range, 0.4%-1.9%) for pipetting 100 μL, and 0.2% (range, 0.1%-0.5%) for pipetting 1 mL. Overall, the mean inter-individual imprecision was 8.1% for pipetting 10 μL, 1.1% for pipetting 100 μL and 0.4% for pipetting 1 mL. A significantly inverse correlation was found between intra-individual pipetting imprecision and the amount of water dispensed (r = -0.80; p<0.001). No significant correlation was observed between individual pipetting performance and sex, age, qualification, and years of experience in the laboratory.

Conclusions: The results of this study show that manual pipetting is plagued by a considerable intra- and inter-individual imprecision, which is inversely correlated with the amount of fluid dispensed.

Keywords: imprecision; pipette; pipetting; quality; variability.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Clinical Laboratory Techniques / instrumentation*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Quality Control
  • Reproducibility of Results