Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Nov 16:6:37018.
doi: 10.1038/srep37018.

Observations of severe and lethal coalitionary attacks in wild mountain gorillas

Affiliations

Observations of severe and lethal coalitionary attacks in wild mountain gorillas

Stacy Rosenbaum et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

In humans and chimpanzees, most intraspecific killing occurs during coalitionary intergroup conflict. In the closely related genus Gorilla, such behavior has not been described. We report three cases of multi-male, multi-female wild mountain gorilla (G. beringei) groups attacking extra-group males. The behavior was strikingly similar to reports in chimpanzees, but was never observed in gorillas until after a demographic transition left ~25% of the population living in large social groups with multiple (3+) males. Resource competition is generally considered a motivator of great apes' (including humans) violent intergroup conflict, but mountain gorillas are non-territorial herbivores with low feeding competition. While adult male gorillas have a defensible resource (i.e. females) and nursing/pregnant females are likely motivated to drive off potentially infanticidal intruders, the participation of others (e.g. juveniles, sub-adults, cycling females) is harder to explain. We speculate that the potential for severe group disruption when current alpha males are severely injured or killed may provide sufficient motivation when the costs to participants are low. These observations suggest that the gorilla population's recent increase in multi-male groups facilitated the emergence of such behavior, and indicates social structure is a key predictor of coalitionary aggression even in the absence of meaningful resource stress.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Hand lacerations from the 2004 attack.
Photograph courtesy of Chris Whittier.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Pablo group members gather during the 2010 attack; the victim was in the center of the surrounding animals.
Photograph courtesy of the Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund International.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Tooby J. & Cosmides L. The evolution of war and its cognitive foundations. Institute for Evolutionary Studies Technical Report 88(1), 1–15 (1988).
    1. Wilson M. L. et al.. Lethal aggression in Pan is better explained by adaptive strategies than human impacts. Nature 513(7518), 414–417 (2014). - PubMed
    1. Wrangham R. W. & Glowacki L. Intergroup aggression in chimpanzees and war in nomadic hunter-gatherers. Hum Nature 23(1), 5–29 (2012). - PubMed
    1. Jaeggi A. V., Boose K. J., White F. J. & Gurven M. Obstacles and catalysts of cooperation in humans, bonobos, and chimpanzees: behavioural reaction norms can help explain variation in sex roles, inequality, war and peace. Behavior, online early view, doi: 10.1163/1568539X-00003347 (2016). - DOI
    1. Goodall J. et al.. In The Great Apes 13–54 (ed. Hamburg D. A. & McCown E. R.) (Benjamin/Cummings 1979).

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources