Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Nov 15;8(11):726.
doi: 10.3390/nu8110726.

Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Peak Torque Differences Between Vegetarian and Omnivore Endurance Athletes: A Cross-Sectional Study

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Peak Torque Differences Between Vegetarian and Omnivore Endurance Athletes: A Cross-Sectional Study

Heidi M Lynch et al. Nutrients. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

In spite of well-documented health benefits of vegetarian diets, less is known regarding the effects of these diets on athletic performance. In this cross-sectional study, we compared elite vegetarian and omnivore adult endurance athletes for maximal oxygen uptake (VO2 max) and strength. Twenty-seven vegetarian (VEG) and 43 omnivore (OMN) athletes were evaluated using VO2 max testing on the treadmill, and strength assessment using a dynamometer to determine peak torque for leg extensions. Dietary data were assessed using detailed seven-day food logs. Although total protein intake was lower among vegetarians in comparison to omnivores, protein intake as a function of body mass did not differ by group (1.2 ± 0.3 and 1.4 ± 0.5 g/kg body mass for VEG and OMN respectively, p = 0.220). VO2 max differed for females by diet group (53.0 ± 6.9 and 47.1 ± 8.6 mL/kg/min for VEG and OMN respectively, p < 0.05) but not for males (62.6 ± 15.4 and 55.7 ± 8.4 mL/kg/min respectively). Peak torque did not differ significantly between diet groups. Results from this study indicate that vegetarian endurance athletes' cardiorespiratory fitness was greater than that for their omnivorous counterparts, but that peak torque did not differ between diet groups. These data suggest that vegetarian diets do not compromise performance outcomes and may facilitate aerobic capacity in athletes.

Keywords: Dual X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA); VO2 max; body composition; dynamometer; endurance; protein; sustainability; torque; vegetarian.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funding sponsor had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to publish the results.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 5 articles

References

    1. Fraser G. A comparison of first event coronary heart disease rates in two contrasting California populations. J. Nutr. Health Aging. 2004;9:53–58. - PubMed
    1. Catsburg C., Kim R.S., Kirsh V.A., Soskolne C.L., Kreiger N., Rohan T.E. Dietary patterns and breast cancer risk: A study in 2 cohorts. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2015;101:817–823. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.114.097659. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Orlich M.J., Singh P.N., Sabaté J., Fan J., Sveen L., Bennett H., Knutsen S.F., Beeson W.L., Jaceldo-Siegl K., Butler T.L., et al. Vegetarian dietary patterns and the risk of colorectal cancers. JAMA Int. Med. 2015;175:767–776. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.59. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tantamango-Bartley Y., Knutsen S.F., Knutsen R., Jacobsen B.K., Fan J., Beeson W.L., Sabate J., Hadley D., Jaceldo-Siegl K., Penniecook J., et al. Are strict vegetarians protected against prostate cancer? Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2016;103:153–160. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.114.106450. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kahleova H., Pelikanova T. Vegetarian Diets in the Prevention and Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 2015;34:448–458. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2014.976890. - DOI - PubMed
Feedback