Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jan 19;2(1):e000012.
doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2015-000012. eCollection 2016.

The sensitivity and specificity of clinical measures of sport concussion: three tests are better than one

Affiliations

The sensitivity and specificity of clinical measures of sport concussion: three tests are better than one

Jacob E Resch et al. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. .

Abstract

Context: A battery of clinical measures of neurocognition, balance and symptoms has been recommended for the management of sport concussion (SC) but is based on variable evidence.

Objective: To examine the sensitivity and specificity of a battery of tests to assess SC in college athletes.

Design: Cross-sectional.

Setting: Research laboratory.

Patients or other participants: Division 1 athletes diagnosed with a SC (n=40) who were 20.2±1.60 years of age and 180.5±11.12 cm tall and healthy athletes (n=40) who were 19.0±0.93 years of age and 179.1±11.39 cm tall were enrolled.

Interventions: Participants were administered Immediate Postconcussion Assessment and Cognitive Test (ImPACT), the Sensory Organization Test (SOT) and the Revised Head Injury Scale (HIS-r) prior to and up to 24 h following injury between the 2004 and 2014 sport seasons. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated using predictive discriminant analyses (PDA) and clinical interpretation guidelines.

Main outcome measures: Outcome measures included baseline and postinjury ImPACT, SOT and HIS-r composite scores.

Results: Using PDA, each clinical measure's sensitivity ranged from 55.0% to 77.5% and specificity ranged from 52.5% to 100%. The test battery possessed a sensitivity and specificity of 80.0% and 100%, respectively. Using clinical interpretation guidelines, sensitivity ranged from 55% to 97.5% individually, and 100% when combined.

Conclusions: Our results support a multidimensional approach to assess SC in college athletes which correctly identified 80-100% of concussed participants as injured. When each test was evaluated separately, up to 47.5% of our sample was misclassified. Caution is warranted when using singular measures to manage SC.

Keywords: Concussion Assessment; Mild Traumatic Brain Injury; Neurocognitive; Sensitivity; Specificity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The sensitivity of ImPACT, the SOT and HIS-r administered individually and combined. (A) Sensitivity as calculated using predictive discriminant analysis. (B) Sensitivity as calculated using clinical interpretation guidelines (ImPACT, Immediate Postconcussion Assessment and Cognitive Test).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Giza CC, Kutcher JS, Ashwal S et al. . Summary of evidence-based guideline update: Evaluation and management of concussion in sports: report of the Guideline Development Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 2013;80:2250–7. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31828d57dd - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Harmon KG, Drezner JA, Gammons M et al. . American Medical Society for Sports Medicine position statement: concussion in sport. Br J Sports Med 2013;47:15–26. 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091941 - DOI - PubMed
    1. McCrory P, Meeuwisse WH, Aubry M et al. . Consensus statement on concussion in sport: the 4(th) International Conference on Concussion in Sport held in Zurich, November 2012. J Am Coll Surg 2013;216:e55–71. 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.02.020 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Broglio SP, Cantu RC, Gioia GA et al. . National Athletic Trainers’ Association position statement: management of sport concussion. J Athl Train 2014;49:245–65. 10.4085/1062-6050-49.1.07 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anonymous. NATA Position Statement Disclaimer. Secondary NATA Position Statement Disclaimer 2014. http://www.nata.org/position-statements

LinkOut - more resources