Minimally invasive mitral repair surgery: why does controversy still persist?

Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2017 Jan;15(1):15-24. doi: 10.1080/14779072.2017.1266936. Epub 2016 Dec 10.

Abstract

Surgical treatment for mitral valve disease has evolved and remains a rapidly expanding field. Minimally invasive mitral valve repair (MI-MVR) is a well-known alternative to conventional sternotomy mitral valve repair (cMVR). However, controversy as to the efficacy of MI-MVR persists, hindering the adoption and potential benefits of this less invasive approach. Areas covered: In this review, we provide an updated summary evaluation of the latest evidence, including observational studies, clinical trials and meta-analyses, regarding MI-MVR in comparison to cMVR. Expert commentary: The controversy that persists around the widespread adoption of MI-MVR procedures is addressed with the wealth of evidence published establishing similarly excellent outcomes between MI-MVR and cMVR.

Keywords: Minimally invasive; endoscopic; mini-thoracotomy; mitral valve; robotic.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation / methods*
  • Humans
  • Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures / methods
  • Mitral Valve Annuloplasty / methods*
  • Mitral Valve Insufficiency* / diagnosis
  • Mitral Valve* / diagnostic imaging
  • Mitral Valve* / surgery
  • Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care
  • Robotic Surgical Procedures / methods
  • Treatment Outcome