Artefacts in multimodal imaging of titanium, zirconium and binary titanium-zirconium alloy dental implants: an in vitro study

Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2017 Feb;46(2):20160267. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20160267. Epub 2016 Dec 2.

Abstract

Objectives: To analyze and evaluate imaging artefacts induced by zirconium, titanium and titanium-zirconium alloy dental implants.

Methods: Zirconium, titanium and titanium-zirconium alloy implants were embedded in gelatin and MRI, CT and CBCT were performed. Standard protocols were used for each modality. For MRI, line-distance profiles were plotted to quantify the accuracy of size determination. For CT and CBCT, six shells surrounding the implant were defined every 0.5 cm from the implant surface and histogram parameters were determined for each shell.

Results: While titanium and titanium-zirconium alloy induced extensive signal voids in MRI owing to strong susceptibility, zirconium implants were clearly definable with only minor distortion artefacts. For titanium and titanium-zirconium alloy, the MR signal was attenuated up to 14.1 mm from the implant. In CT, titanium and titanium-zirconium alloy resulted in less streak artefacts in comparison with zirconium. In CBCT, titanium-zirconium alloy induced more severe artefacts than zirconium and titanium.

Conclusions: MRI allows for an excellent image contrast and limited artefacts in patients with zirconium implants. CT and CBCT examinations are less affected by artefacts from titanium and titanium-zirconium alloy implants compared with MRI. The knowledge about differences of artefacts through different implant materials and image modalities might help support clinical decisions for the choice of implant material or imaging device in the clinical setting.

Keywords: CBCT; MRI; artefacts; dental implants; spiral CT.

MeSH terms

  • Artifacts*
  • Dental Alloys
  • Dental Implants*
  • Multimodal Imaging*
  • Titanium
  • Zirconium

Substances

  • Dental Alloys
  • Dental Implants
  • Zirconium
  • Titanium