Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Dec 3:5:e21337.
doi: 10.7554/eLife.21337.

Spatial patterning of P granules by RNA-induced phase separation of the intrinsically-disordered protein MEG-3

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Spatial patterning of P granules by RNA-induced phase separation of the intrinsically-disordered protein MEG-3

Jarrett Smith et al. Elife. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

RNA granules are non-membrane bound cellular compartments that contain RNA and RNA binding proteins. The molecular mechanisms that regulate the spatial distribution of RNA granules in cells are poorly understood. During polarization of the C. elegans zygote, germline RNA granules, called P granules, assemble preferentially in the posterior cytoplasm. We present evidence that P granule asymmetry depends on RNA-induced phase separation of the granule scaffold MEG-3. MEG-3 is an intrinsically disordered protein that binds and phase separates with RNA in vitro. In vivo, MEG-3 forms a posterior-rich concentration gradient that is anti-correlated with a gradient in the RNA-binding protein MEX-5. MEX-5 is necessary and sufficient to suppress MEG-3 granule formation in vivo, and suppresses RNA-induced MEG-3 phase separation in vitro. Our findings suggest that MEX-5 interferes with MEG-3's access to RNA, thus locally suppressing MEG-3 phase separation to drive P granule asymmetry. Regulated access to RNA, combined with RNA-induced phase separation of key scaffolding proteins, may be a general mechanism for controlling the formation of RNA granules in space and time.

Keywords: C. elegans; MEG-3; MEX-5; P granules; RNA granules; cell biology; developmental biology; germline; phase separation; stem cells.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Localization of P granule proteins during zygote polarization.
(A) Photomicrographs of live wild-type (mCherry::MEX-5 and GLH-1::eGFP) or fixed meg-4 zygotes (MEG::3 OLLAS and PGL-1) at three different stages: before polarization (pronuclear formation), during polarization (pronuclear migration) and after polarization (mitosis). meg-4(ax3052) zygotes were co-immunostained for MEG-3::OLLAS (anti-OLLAS, Novus Biological), and PGL-1 (K76, DSHB). meg-4 is required redundantly with meg-3 for P granule assembly, and each is sufficient to support localized granule assembly (Wang et al., 2014). In this and subsequent figures, dashed lines outline each embryo, embryos are oriented with anterior to the left and posterior to the right and are ~50 μM long. At least three embryos were examined per genotype shown. (B) MEG-3::meGFP levels in the anterior and posterior halves of the zygote during polarization. Values represent average fluorescence intensity over time (relative to initial levels) in the anterior (red) and posterior (blue). Averages come from values measured from three different embryos. Error bars represent standard deviation of the mean. (C) Photomicrographs of fixed zygotes after polarization immunostained for OLLAS, PGL-1, or FLAG. mex-5/6 zygotes were derived from wild-type hermaphrodites treated with mex-5 and mex-6 RNAi. meg-3/4 zygotes were derived from meg-3(ax3055); meg-4(ax3052) hermaphrodites. pgl-1/3 zygotes were derived from pgl-3(bn104) hermaphrodites treated with pgl-1 RNAi (see Figure 1—figure supplement 1 for additional examples of pgl-1(RNAi);pgl-3(bn104) zygotes also stained for PGL-1 to verify loss of PGL-1). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.21337.003
Figure 1—figure supplement 1.
Figure 1—figure supplement 1.. MEG-3 localizes before PGL-1 and does not require PGL-1 or PGL-3 to assemble granules.
(A) Photomicrographs of live MEG-3::meGFP in zygotes at three different stages: before polarization (pronuclear formation), during polarization (pronuclear migration) and after polarization (mitosis). These and similar images taken from 3 zygotes at 14 time points were used to quantify MEG-3::meGFP fluorescence levels over time as shown in Figure 1B. (B) Photomicrographs of fixed wild-type and meg-3/4 zygotes after polarization immunostained for PGL-3. meg-3/4 zygotes were derived from meg-3(ax3055); meg-4(ax3052) hermaphrodites. PGL-3 staining was done using the KT3 antibody (DSHB). (C) Photomicrographs of fixed zygotes stained with anti-FLAG (top) and K76 anti-PGL-1 (bottom) to show MEG-4 localization at the 1-cell (left) and 4-cell (right) stages. pgl-1/3 zygotes were derived from pgl-3(bn104); meg-4(ax2080FLAG tag) hermaphrodites treated with pgl-1 RNAi. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.21337.004
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. MEX-5 is necessary and sufficient to disassemble MEG-3 granules in vivo.
(A) Photomicrographs of mCherry tagged live zygotes [wild-type and mex-5(S404A)] or fixed zygotes expressing MEX-5 tagged with an OLLAS epitope [mex-5(ZF-);mex-6(RNAi)] at pronuclear meeting to show MEX-5 localization. Wild-type MEX-5 is in an anterior-rich gradient, whereas MEX-5(S404A) and MEX-5(ZF-) are uniformly distributed. Numbers indicate number of zygotes exhibiting phenotype shown / total number of zygotes examined. (B) Photomicrographs of live embryos expressing MEG-3::meGFP. Genotypes at the mex-5 locus are as indicated. Numbers indicate the numbers of zygotes examined as in A. In 1/10 mex-5(ZF-, S404A); mex-6(RNAi) zygotes, MEG-3 granules were asymmetric possibly due to incomplete depletion of MEX-6 by RNAi. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.21337.005
Figure 2—figure supplement 1.
Figure 2—figure supplement 1.. Expression of MEX-5, and MEX-5(ZF-), MEG-3, and MEG-3IDR.
(A) MEX-5 functions redundantly with MEX-6 to localize MEG-3: Photomicrographs of live wild-type and mex-5(RNAi) zygotes co-expressing mCherry:MEX-5 and MEG-3::meGFP. Loss of mCherry fluorescence in the mex-4(RNAi) zygotes was used to confirm efficient loss of mCherry::MEX-5. Numbers indicate number of zygotes exhibiting phenotype shown / total number of zygotes examined. (B) Western blot of embryo lysates co-blotted with α OLLAS and α tubulin (loading control). Expected sizes for protein-epitope fusions are indicated on the right by a < symbol. N2 lysate is a control lysate expressing no tagged proteins, all others are lysates from embryos expressing tagged proteins as indicated. (C) Bar graph showing relative expression of MEG-3 and MEX-5. Western blot in Figure 2—figure supplement 1 was quantified using Image J. MEX-5 is 10X more abundant than MEG-3. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.21337.006
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. MEG-3 Binds RNA in vitro.
(A) Binding of MEG-3 to poly-uridine 30 (poly-U30) is shown by electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) using fluorescein-labeled poly-U. EMSAs are shown for (top to bottom) full length MEG-3, MEG-3IDR, and MEG-3Cterm. Unbound poly-U30 is denoted by an asterisk (*). For each image shown, n ≥ 3 technical replicates. (B) Fluorescence Polarization of poly-U30 by MEG-3. Fluorescence polarization values normalized relative to saturation are shown for full length MEG-3 (green), MEG-3IDR (black), and MEG-3Cterm (red). Values represent averages of ≥3 technical replicates. A fit of the polarization as a function of protein concentration is plotted and used to calculate the given Kd,app. Error bars report S.E.M. Expanded graphs are shown in Figure 3—figure supplement 1. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.21337.007
Figure 3—figure supplement 1.
Figure 3—figure supplement 1.. MEG-3 RNA binding.
(A) Coomassie stained gel showing His-tagged MEG-3 proteins. Expected sizes are indicated on the right. Each lane is from a separate gel. (B) RNA-RNA competition EMSA. 300 nM MEG-3 (300 nM) was incubated with 50 nM poly-U30 and increasing amounts of unlabeled 30-mer RNAs as indicated to the left of each panel. The first lane of each gel contains only labeled poly-U RNA. The last lane of each gel contains poly-U RNA and the highest concentration of unlabeled competitor RNA (5000 nM). The unbound poly-U RNA is denoted by an asterisk (*). Double asterisks (**) in the poly-G assay denote a band that arises due to an interaction between poly-G and poly-U (independent of MEG-3). For each image shown, n = 2 technical replicates. (C) Fluorescence Polarization of polyuridine by MEG-3 (expanded from Figure 3). Fluorescence polarization values normalized relative to saturation are shown for full length MEG-3 (top, green), MEG-3IDR (middle, black), and MEG-3Cterm (bottom, red). Values represent averages of ≥3 technical replicates. A fit of the polarization as a function of protein concentration is plotted and used to calculate the given Kd,app. Error bars report S.E.M. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.21337.008
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. Stimulation of MEG-3 phase separation by RNA.
(A) Bar graph showing the number of condensates formed by 0.5 μM MEG-3 or MEG-3IDR in the presence of increasing poly-U30. Values represent averages from three technical replicates. Error bars indicate S.E.M. (B) Photomicrographs of phase separation assay showing condensate formation of 5 μM full length MEG-3 incubated with poly-U RNA and/or MEX-5 as indicated.(C) Violin plots showing condensate size and number for each experiment represented in B. The height of the plot shows the area of condensates in μm2. The width of the plot correlates to the proportion of condensates of that size. Numbers inside each violin plot are the total number of condensates pooled from three technical replicates for each condition. An additional control is shown in Figure 4—figure supplement 2. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.21337.009
Figure 4—figure supplement 1.
Figure 4—figure supplement 1.. Phase Separation assay titration.
DIC images of MEG-3 solutions in the presence of increasing concentrations of protein and RNA. MEG-3 was diluted into phase separation buffer (25 mM HEPES, pH7.4, NaCl adjusted to a final concentration of 150 mM) at room temperature. The solution was transferred to a glass bottom dish and the dish surface was photographed using an inverted DIC microscope 10 min after the initial dilution (room temperature). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.21337.010
Figure 4—figure supplement 2.
Figure 4—figure supplement 2.. Phase Separation assay controls.
(A) Same as above except 3’ fluorescein labeled poly-U RNA was included in the buffer. DIC images (left) show the MEG-3 condensates and fluorescence images (488 channel) show the 3’ fluorescein labeled poly-U RNA concentrated in the condensates. (B) Violin plots showing condensate size and number comparing MEG-3 alone and MEG-3 + MEX-5 (Additional data). As in Figure 4C, the height of the plot shows the area of condensates in μm2. The width of the plot correlates to the proportion of condensates of that size. Numbers inside each violin plot are the total number of condensates pooled from three technical replicates for each condition. Data for the MEG-3 alone sample are the same as in Figure 4C and shown here only for reference. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.21337.011
Figure 5.
Figure 5.. Coalescence of MEG-3IDR can be stimulated by blocking mRNA turnover in vivo.
(A) Photomicrographs of fixed embryos expressing MEG-3IDR tagged with OLLAS epitope. First row are zygotes (one-cell stage) and second row are later stage embryos as indicated. (B) Photomicrographs of fixed zygotes expressing MEG-3IDR tagged with OLLAS epitope. Genotypes are indicated above each embryo (left to right: wild-type, mex-5/6(RNAi), and let-711(RNAi)). Numbers indicate number of zygotes exhibiting phenotype shown / total number of zygotes examined. In 1/8 let-711(RNAi) zygotes, MEG-3IDR formed granules but these were smaller and confined to the posterior half of the zygote, possibly due to incomplete depletion of let-711. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.21337.012
Figure 5—figure supplement 1.
Figure 5—figure supplement 1.. MEG-3IDR in vivo.
Western blot of mixed-stage embryo lysates co-blotted with α OLLAS and α tubulin. Expected sizes for protein-epitope fusions are indicated on the right by a < symbol. Dashed line indicates a break in the original gel. Genotype is indicated on the bottom. The MEG-3IDR is present at higher level than MEG-3, likely due to the fact that unlike MEG-3, MEG-3IDR persists longer in somatic cells (see Figure 5 and data not shown). The significance of this difference is not known. n = 3 technical replicates. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.21337.013

Comment in

  • All about the RNA after all.
    Trcek T, Lehmann R. Trcek T, et al. Elife. 2017 Jan 24;6:e24106. doi: 10.7554/eLife.24106. Elife. 2017. PMID: 28117660 Free PMC article.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Anderson P, Kedersha N. RNA granules. The Journal of cell biology. 2006;172:803–808. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200512082. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Basu S, Bahadur RP. A structural perspective of RNA recognition by intrinsically disordered proteins. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 2016;73:4075–4084. doi: 10.1007/s00018-016-2283-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brangwynne CP, Eckmann CR, Courson DS, Rybarska A, Hoege C, Gharakhani J, Jülicher F, Hyman AA. Germline P granules are liquid droplets that localize by controlled dissolution/condensation. Science. 2009;324:1729–1732. doi: 10.1126/science.1172046. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brenner S. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1974;77:71–94. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Buchan JR, Parker R. Eukaryotic stress granules: the ins and outs of translation. Molecular Cell. 2009;36:932–941. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.11.020. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms