Ovarian Conservation and Overall Survival in Young Women With Early-Stage Cervical Cancer
- PMID: 27926642
- PMCID: PMC7528442
- DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001754
Ovarian Conservation and Overall Survival in Young Women With Early-Stage Cervical Cancer
Abstract
Objective: To identify predictors of ovarian conservation at hysterectomy and to examine the association of ovarian conservation and survival of young women with early-stage cervical cancer.
Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program to identify hysterectomy-based surgically treated patients with stage I cervical cancer diagnosed between 1983 and 2012 (N=16,511). Multivariable models were used to identify independent factors associated with ovarian conservation. Among the subgroup of 9,419 women younger than 50 years of age with stage I disease, survival outcomes and causes of death were examined for 3,908 (41.5%) women who underwent ovarian conservation at hysterectomy without radiotherapy.
Results: On multivariable analysis, age younger than 50 years, stage IA disease, and squamous histology were independent factors associated with ovarian conservation (all, P<.001). Among 5,526 women younger than 50 years of age with stage IA disease who underwent hysterectomy without radiotherapy, overall survival was significantly higher in patients undergoing ovarian conservation than in those undergoing oophorectomy (20-year rate, 93.5% compared with 86.8%, P<.001); cervical cancer-specific survival was similar between the patients who underwent ovarian conservation and those who underwent oophorectomy (98.8% compared with 97.8%, P=.12). On multivariable analysis, ovarian conservation remained an independent prognostic factor for improved overall survival (adjusted hazard ratio 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49-0.82, P=.001) and was independently associated with lower cumulative risks of death resulting from cardiovascular disease (20-year cumulative rate, 1.2% compared with 3.3%, adjusted hazard ratio 0.47, 95% CI 0.26-0.86, P=.014) and other chronic disease (0.5% compared with 1.4%, adjusted hazard ratio 0.24, 95% CI 0.09-0.65, P=.005) compared with oophorectomy. Both cervical cancer-specific survival (20-year rate, 93.1% compared with 92.0%, P=.37) and overall survival (86.7% compared with 84.6%, P=.12) were similar between ovarian conservation and oophorectomy among 3,893 women younger than 50 years of age with stage IB disease who underwent hysterectomy without radiotherapy.
Conclusion: Among young women with stage IA cervical cancer, ovarian conservation at hysterectomy is associated with decreased all-cause mortality including death resulting from cardiovascular disease and other chronic diseases.
Conflict of interest statement
Financial Disclosure
The authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Risk of metachronous ovarian cancer after ovarian conservation in young women with stage I cervical cancer.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Nov;217(5):580.e1-580.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.06.019. Epub 2017 Jun 27. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017. PMID: 28666700 Free PMC article.
-
Ovarian Conservation and Overall Survival in Young Women With Early-Stage Low-Grade Endometrial Cancer.Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Oct;128(4):761-70. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001647. Obstet Gynecol. 2016. PMID: 27607873 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of surgical approach on oncologic outcomes in women undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Dec;221(6):619.e1-619.e24. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.07.009. Epub 2019 Jul 6. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019. PMID: 31288006
-
Safety of ovarian preservation in women with stage I and II cervical adenocarcinoma: a retrospective study and meta-analysis.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Oct;215(4):460.e1-460.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.04.023. Epub 2016 Apr 29. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016. PMID: 27133009 Review.
-
Adenosquamous histology predicts a poor outcome for patients with advanced-stage, but not early-stage, cervical carcinoma.Cancer. 2003 May 1;97(9):2196-202. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11371. Cancer. 2003. PMID: 12712471 Review.
Cited by
-
Differences in Cervical Cancer Outcomes by Caribbean Nativity in Black and White Women in Florida.Cancer Control. 2023 Jan-Dec;30:10732748231176642. doi: 10.1177/10732748231176642. Cancer Control. 2023. PMID: 37226430 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of ovarian-sparing surgery and ovariectomy on prognosis in early cervical adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Gland Surg. 2022 Jun;11(6):1103-1110. doi: 10.21037/gs-22-310. Gland Surg. 2022. PMID: 35800738 Free PMC article.
-
A prognostic model guides surgical resection in cervical squamous cell carcinoma.Transl Cancer Res. 2020 Mar;9(3):1711-1731. doi: 10.21037/tcr.2020.02.71. Transl Cancer Res. 2020. PMID: 35117519 Free PMC article.
-
Endometrial cancer.Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2021 Dec 9;7(1):88. doi: 10.1038/s41572-021-00324-8. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2021. PMID: 34887451 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Analyses of the association between cervical cancer and osteoporosis/osteoporotic fracture: a cross-sectional study using KoGES HEXA data.Int J Clin Oncol. 2021 Sep;26(9):1752-1758. doi: 10.1007/s10147-021-01951-7. Epub 2021 Jun 6. Int J Clin Oncol. 2021. PMID: 34091796
References
-
- Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin 2016;2016:7–30. - PubMed
-
- Quinn MA, Benedet JL, Odicino F, Maisonneuve P, Beller U, Creasman WT, et al. Carcinoma of the cervix uteri. FIGO 26th annual report on the results of treatment in gynecological cancer. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2006;95(suppl 1):S43–103. - PubMed
-
- Waggoner SE. Cervical cancer. Lancet 2003;361:2217–25. - PubMed
-
- National Comprehensive Cancer Network Cervical Cancer. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guideline), version 1. 2016. Available at: http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/cervical.pdf. Retrieved March 19, 2016.
-
- Touhami O, Plante M. Should ovaries be removed or not in (early-stage) adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: a review. Gynecol Oncol 2015;136:384–8. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
