Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2017 May 1;3(5):666-671.
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.5630.

Intrinsic Subtype Switching and Acquired ERBB2/HER2 Amplifications and Mutations in Breast Cancer Brain Metastases

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Intrinsic Subtype Switching and Acquired ERBB2/HER2 Amplifications and Mutations in Breast Cancer Brain Metastases

Nolan Priedigkeit et al. JAMA Oncol. .

Erratum in

  • Supplement 2 Added.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] JAMA Oncol. 2017 Mar 1;3(3):418. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.6886. JAMA Oncol. 2017. PMID: 28056133 No abstract available.

Abstract

Importance: Patients with breast cancer (BrCa) brain metastases (BrM) have limited therapeutic options. A better understanding of molecular alterations acquired in BrM could identify clinically actionable metastatic dependencies.

Objective: To determine whether there are intrinsic subtype differences between primary tumors and matched BrM and to uncover BrM-acquired alterations that are clinically actionable.

Design, setting, and participants: In total, 20 cases of primary breast cancer tissue and resected BrM (10 estrogen receptor [ER]-negative and 10 ER-positive) from 2 academic institutions were included. Eligible cases in the discovery cohort harbored patient-matched primary breast cancer tissue and resected BrM. Given the rarity of patient-matched samples, no exclusion criteria were enacted. Two validation sequencing cohorts were used-a published data set of 17 patient-matched cases of BrM and a cohort of 7884 BrCa tumors enriched for metastatic samples.

Main outcomes and measures: Brain metastases expression changes in 127 genes within BrCa signatures, PAM50 assignments, and ERBB2/HER2 DNA-level gains.

Results: Overall, 17 of 20 BrM retained the PAM50 subtype of the primary BrCa. Despite this concordance, 17 of 20 BrM harbored expression changes (<2-fold or >2-fold) in clinically actionable genes including gains of FGFR4 (n = 6 [30%]), FLT1 (n = 4 [20%]), AURKA (n = 2 [10%]) and loss of ESR1 expression (n = 9 [45%]). The most recurrent expression gain was ERBB2/HER2, which showed a greater than 2-fold expression increase in 7 of 20 BrM (35%). Three of these 7 cases were ERBB2/HER2-negative out of 13 ERBB2/HER2-negative in the primary BrCa cohort and became immunohistochemical positive (3+) in the paired BrM with metastasis-specific amplification of the ERBB2/HER2 locus. In an independent data set, 2 of 9 (22.2%) ERBB2/HER2-negative BrCa switched to ERBB2/HER2-positive with 1 BrM acquiring ERBB2/HER2 amplification and the other showing metastatic enrichment of the activating V777L ERBB2/HER2 mutation. An expanded cohort revealed that ERBB2/HER2 amplification and/or mutation frequency was unchanged between local disease and metastases across all sites; however, a significant enrichment was appreciated for BrM (13% local vs 24% BrM; P < .001).

Conclusions and relevance: Breast cancer BrM commonly acquire alterations in clinically actionable genes, with metastasis-acquired ERBB2/HER2 alterations in approximately 20% of ERBB2/HER2-negative cases. These observations have immediate clinical implications for patients with ERBB2/HER2-negative breast cancer and support comprehensive profiling of metastases to inform clinical care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Hartmaier is an employee of, owns stock in, and receives royalties from Foundation Medicine Inc and has received honoraria from Biorad Laboratories. Dr Lucas owns stock in AMGen. Dr Chmielecki is an employee of, owns stock in, and receives royalties from Foundation Medicine Inc. Dr Puhalla serves an advisory and/or consulting role to Celldex, MedImmune, and Pfizer and has research funding from Abbvie, Novartis, Lilly, Pfizer, Incyte and Covance/Bayer. Dr Young has 2 patents unrelated to this work with no royalties received (PCT/IE2009/000015/US 8501483 B2, PCT/EP2012/071864/WO2013064699 A1). No other conflicts are reported.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Expression Profile Similarity in Patient-Matched Breast Cancer Metastases to the Brain
(A) Unsupervised hierarchical clustering heatmap of 20 patient-matched cases with hormone status (green indicates positive; black, negative), tissue site source or institution (yellow indicates Royal College of Surgeons [RCS], Ireland; purple, University of Pittsburgh [Pitt], United States), and tumor site (blue indicates primary; red, metastasis) of each sample indicated. The asterisks below the plots indicate patient-matched pairs that clustered in the same doublet of a clade in the dendrogram. (B) PAM50 intrinsic molecular subtype calls in patient-matched cases (red indicates basal; green, ERBB2/HER2; blue, LumA; yellow, LumB). Discordant pairs are marked with a delta symbol. BP indicates breast primary; BrM, brain metastasis.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Recurrent Expression Alterations in Breast Cancer Brain Metastases
(A) OncoPrint plot of highly recurrent (>25% of cases) expression alterations in 20 cases, ranked by frequency of alteration by gene. Blue tile represents a greater than 2-fold decrease in the patient-matched brain metastasis relative to the primary, while a red tile represents a greater than 2-fold increase. (B) Tile plot visualizing expression alterations in clinically actionable genes. Top panel consists of recurrent increases in expression (light red indicates a >2-fold increase; dark red, >4-fold increase), bottom panel are recurrent decreases in expression (light blue indicates a >2-fold decrease; dark blue, >4-fold decrease) between patient-matched pairs. Pitt indicates University of Pittsburgh; RSC, Royal College of Surgeons.
Figure 3
Figure 3. ERBB2/HER2 Gains in Breast Cancer Brain Metastases
(A) Paired ladder plot of ERBB2/HER2 expression in patient-matched cases. Gray dots represent samples with suspected hormone status switching; P values are from Wilcoxon signed-rank tests (primaries vs metastases). (B) The top panel shows ERBB2/HER2 alterations (amplification or mutation) in 3135 local tumors and 4130 metastatic tumors, and the bottom panel shows ERBB2/HER2 alterations in local tumors and 167 brain metastases (mets). NS indicates not significant.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dawood S, Broglio K, Esteva FJ, et al. Defining prognosis for women with breast cancer and CNS metastases by HER2 status. Ann Oncol. 2008;19(7):1242–1248. - PubMed
    1. Bachelot T, Romieu G, Campone M, et al. Lapatinib plus capecitabine in patients with previously untreated brain metastases from HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (LANDSCAPE): a single-group phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(1):64–71. - PubMed
    1. Partridge AH, Rumble RB, Carey LA, et al. Chemotherapy and targeted therapy for women with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (or unknown) advanced breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(29):3307–3329. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nilsen G, Liestøl K, Van Loo P, et al. Copynumber: efficient algorithms for single- and multi-track copy number segmentation. BMC Genomics. 2012;13(1):591. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gendoo D, Ratanasirigulchai N, Schröder M, et al. [Accessed November 7, 2016];genefu: a package for breast cancer gene expression analysis. https://www.bioconductor.org/packages/devel/bioc/vignettes/genefu/inst/d.... - PMC - PubMed

Publication types