Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2016 Dec 8;11(12):e0167846.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167846. eCollection 2016.

Early Antenatal Prediction of Gestational Diabetes in Obese Women: Development of Prediction Tools for Targeted Intervention

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Randomized Controlled Trial

Early Antenatal Prediction of Gestational Diabetes in Obese Women: Development of Prediction Tools for Targeted Intervention

Sara L White et al. PLoS One. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

All obese women are categorised as being of equally high risk of gestational diabetes (GDM) whereas the majority do not develop the disorder. Lifestyle and pharmacological interventions in unselected obese pregnant women have been unsuccessful in preventing GDM. Our aim was to develop a prediction tool for early identification of obese women at high risk of GDM to facilitate targeted interventions in those most likely to benefit. Clinical and anthropometric data and non-fasting blood samples were obtained at 15+0-18+6 weeks' gestation in 1303 obese pregnant women from UPBEAT, a randomised controlled trial of a behavioural intervention. Twenty one candidate biomarkers associated with insulin resistance, and a targeted nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) metabolome were measured. Prediction models were constructed using stepwise logistic regression. Twenty six percent of women (n = 337) developed GDM (International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups criteria). A model based on clinical and anthropometric variables (age, previous GDM, family history of type 2 diabetes, systolic blood pressure, sum of skinfold thicknesses, waist:height and neck:thigh ratios) provided an area under the curve of 0.71 (95%CI 0.68-0.74). This increased to 0.77 (95%CI 0.73-0.80) with addition of candidate biomarkers (random glucose, haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), fructosamine, adiponectin, sex hormone binding globulin, triglycerides), but was not improved by addition of NMR metabolites (0.77; 95%CI 0.74-0.81). Clinically translatable models for GDM prediction including readily measurable variables e.g. mid-arm circumference, age, systolic blood pressure, HbA1c and adiponectin are described. Using a ≥35% risk threshold, all models identified a group of high risk obese women of whom approximately 50% (positive predictive value) later developed GDM, with a negative predictive value of 80%. Tools for early pregnancy identification of obese women at risk of GDM are described which could enable targeted interventions for GDM prevention in women who will benefit the most.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

I have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: LP reports a grant from Abbott Nutrition, outside the submitted work. KMG reports reimbursement for speaking from Nestle Nutrition Institute, grants from Abbot Nutrition and Nestec, outside the submitted work. In addition, KMG has a number of patents pending that are not directly related to this work (Phenotype prediction, Predictive use of CpG methylation and Maternal Nutrition Composition). DAL has received research support from Roche Diagnostics and Medtronic, as well as public and charitable funders, for research that is not central to that presented in this paper. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. SLW, ALB, SMN, EON, SCR, NS, PTS, MCV, MW and DP have no competing interests to report.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Study population.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Spread of time points for positive glucose results leading to GDM diagnosis.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. (NCD-RisC) NRFC. Trends in adult body-mass index in 200 countries from 1975 to 2014: a pooled analysis of 1698 population-based measurement studies with 19.2 million participants. Lancet. 2016;387: 1377–96. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30054-X - DOI - PubMed
    1. Torloni MR, Betran AP, Horta BL, Nakamura MU, Atallah AN, Moron AF, et al. Prepregnancy BMI and the risk of gestational diabetes: a systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2009;10: 194–203. 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2008.00541.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. NICE guidelines. Diabetes in pregnancy: management of diabetes and its complications from preconception to the postnatal period. 2015. nice.org.uk/guidance/ng3
    1. Sovio U, Murphy HR, Smith GC. Accelerated fetal growth prior to diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus: A prospective cohort study of nulliparous women. Diabetes Care. 2016; 39: 982–7. 10.2337/dc16-0160 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Harreiter J, Simmons D, Desoye G, Corcoy R, Adelatado JM, Devlieger R, et al. IADPSG and WHO 2013 gestational diabetes mellitus criteria identify obese women with marked insulin resistance in early pregnancy. Diabetes Care. 2016; - PubMed

Publication types