Direct Comparison of Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, and Apixaban for Effectiveness and Safety in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation
- PMID: 27938741
- DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.07.013
Direct Comparison of Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, and Apixaban for Effectiveness and Safety in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation
Abstract
Background: The introduction of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) has been a major advance for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF). Patients and clinicians now have a choice between different NOACs, but there is no direct comparative effectiveness evidence to guide decision-making. We aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban in clinical practice.
Methods: Using a large US administrative claims database, we created three one-to-one propensity-score-matched cohorts of patients with nonvalvular AF who were users of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or apixaban between October 1, 2010 and February 28, 2015 (rivaroxaban vs dabigatran, n = 31,574; apixaban vs dabigatran, n = 13,084; and apixaban vs rivaroxaban, n = 13,130). The primary outcomes were stroke and systemic embolism (effectiveness) and major bleeding (safety) that occurred during treatment. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare outcomes in propensity-score-matched cohorts.
Results: We found no differences between the three NOACs in the risk of stroke or systemic embolism (hazard ratio [HR], 1.00; 95% CI, 0.75-1.32 for rivaroxaban vs dabigatran; HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.51-1.31 for apixaban vs dabigatran; and HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.64-1.72 for apixaban vs rivaroxaban). Apixaban was associated with a lower risk of major bleeding (HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.36-0.70; P < .001 vs dabigatran and HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.28-0.54; P < .001 vs rivaroxaban). Rivaroxaban was associated with an increased risk of major bleeding (HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.10-1.53; P < .01) and intracranial bleeding (HR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.12-2.86; P < .05) compared with dabigatran.
Conclusions: Dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban appear to have similar effectiveness, although apixaban may be associated with a lower bleeding risk and rivaroxaban may be associated with an elevated bleeding risk.
Keywords: atrial fibrillation; bleeding; non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants; stroke.
Copyright © 2016 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Direct comparative effectiveness and safety between non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.Eur J Epidemiol. 2019 Feb;34(2):173-190. doi: 10.1007/s10654-018-0415-7. Epub 2018 Jun 8. Eur J Epidemiol. 2019. PMID: 29948370
-
Effectiveness and Safety of Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, and Apixaban Versus Warfarin in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Jun 13;5(6):e003725. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003725. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016. PMID: 27412905 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative effectiveness and safety of apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.Int J Cardiol. 2018 Oct 1;268:113-119. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.03.047. Epub 2018 Jun 20. Int J Cardiol. 2018. PMID: 29934230
-
Real-World Setting Comparison of Nonvitamin-K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin-K Antagonists for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Stroke. 2017 Sep;48(9):2494-2503. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017549. Epub 2017 Jul 17. Stroke. 2017. PMID: 28716982 Review.
-
An indirect comparison of dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban for atrial fibrillation.Thromb Haemost. 2012 Sep;108(3):476-84. doi: 10.1160/TH12-02-0093. Epub 2012 Jun 28. Thromb Haemost. 2012. PMID: 22740145 Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluation and treatment of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients taking anticoagulants presenting to the emergency department.Int J Emerg Med. 2024 May 31;17(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12245-024-00649-7. Int J Emerg Med. 2024. PMID: 38822267 Free PMC article.
-
Perioperative Treatment with Rivaroxaban and Dabigatran on Changes of Coagulation and Platelet Activation Biomarkers following Left Atrial Appendage Closure.Cardiovasc Ther. 2024 Mar 12;2024:4405152. doi: 10.1155/2024/4405152. eCollection 2024. Cardiovasc Ther. 2024. PMID: 38505191 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing the Safety and Efficacy of Rivaroxaban for Stroke Prevention in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cureus. 2024 Feb 15;16(2):e54252. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54252. eCollection 2024 Feb. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 38496142 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clinical Impact of Switching or Continuation of Apixaban or Rivaroxaban among Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation.J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 14;13(4):1073. doi: 10.3390/jcm13041073. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38398386 Free PMC article.
-
Predictors for Adherence to Recommended Anticoagulation after Stroke Unit Discharge in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.Cerebrovasc Dis Extra. 2024 Feb 12;14(1):21-9. doi: 10.1159/000537781. Online ahead of print. Cerebrovasc Dis Extra. 2024. PMID: 38346413 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
