Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2017 Apr 15;123(8):1401-1408.
doi: 10.1002/cncr.30489. Epub 2016 Dec 21.

An entertainment-education colorectal cancer screening decision aid for African American patients: A randomized controlled trial

Aubri S Hoffman  1 , Lisa M Lowenstein  1 , Geetanjali R Kamath  1 , Ashley J Housten  1 , Viola B Leal  1 , Suzanne K Linder  2 , Maria L Jibaja-Weiss  3 , Gottumukkala S Raju  4 , Robert J Volk  1
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

An entertainment-education colorectal cancer screening decision aid for African American patients: A randomized controlled trial

Aubri S Hoffman et al. Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Colorectal cancer screening rates for African American patients remain suboptimal. Patient decision aids designed with an entertainment-education approach have been shown to improve saliency and foster informed decision making. The purpose of this study was to assess whether an entertainment-education decision aid tailored for African American patients improved patients' decision making, attitudes, intentions, or colorectal cancer screening behavior.

Methods: Eighty-nine participants were randomized to view 1) a patient decision aid video containing culturally tailored information about colorectal cancer screening options and theory-based support in decision making presented in an entertainment-education format or 2) an attention control video about hypertension that contained similarly detailed information. Participants met with their clinician and then completed follow-up questionnaires assessing their knowledge, decisional conflict, self-advocacy, attitudes, perceived social norms, and intentions. At 3 months, completion of screening was assessed by chart review.

Results: Viewing the culturally tailored decision aid significantly increased African American patients' knowledge of colorectal cancer screening recommendations and options. It also significantly reduced their decisional conflict and improved their self-advocacy. No significant differences were observed in participants' attitudes, norms, or intentions. At three months, 23% of all patients had completed a colonoscopy.

Conclusions: Designing targeted, engaging patient decision aids for groups that receive suboptimal screening holds promise for improving patient decision making and self-advocacy. Additional research is warranted to investigate the effectiveness of such aids in clinical practices with suboptimal screening rates and on downstream behaviors (such as repeat testing). Cancer 2017;123:1401-1408. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Keywords: African American; choice behaviors; colorectal cancer; decision aids; screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Potential Competing Interests

The authors declare no conflicts of interest associated with this manuscript.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Conceptual framework of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening decisions (and selected study outcomes)–
Figure 2
Figure 2
Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials diagram.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. American Cancer Society. Colorectal Cancer Facts & Figures. American Cancer Society; Atlanta: 2016. pp. 2014–2016.
    1. Burt RW, Barthel JS, Dunn KB, et al. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. Colorectal cancer screening. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2010;8:8–61. - PubMed
    1. Dolan NC, Ferreira MR, Fitzgibbon ML, et al. Colorectal cancer screening among African-American and white male veterans. Am J Prev Med. 2005;28:479–482. - PubMed
    1. McFarland EG, Levin B, Lieberman DA, et al. Revised colorectal screening guidelines: joint effort of the American Cancer Society, U.S. Multisociety Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and American College of Radiology. Radiology. 2008;248:717–720. - PubMed
    1. Qaseem A, Denberg TD, Hopkins RH, Jr, et al. Screening for colorectal cancer: a guidance statement from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156:378–386. - PubMed

Publication types