2017 Feb 15
The Complete Structure of the Chloroplast 70S Ribosome in Complex With Translation Factor pY
Item in Clipboard
The Complete Structure of the Chloroplast 70S Ribosome in Complex With Translation Factor pY
Chloroplasts are cellular organelles of plants and algae that are responsible for energy conversion and carbon fixation by the photosynthetic reaction. As a consequence of their endosymbiotic origin, they still contain their own genome and the machinery for protein biosynthesis. Here, we present the atomic structure of the chloroplast 70S ribosome prepared from spinach leaves and resolved by cryo-EM at 3.4 Å resolution. The complete structure reveals the features of the 4.5S rRNA, which probably evolved by the fragmentation of the 23S rRNA, and all five plastid-specific ribosomal proteins. These proteins, required for proper assembly and function of the chloroplast translation machinery, bind and stabilize rRNA including regions that only exist in the chloroplast ribosome. Furthermore, the structure reveals plastid-specific extensions of ribosomal proteins that extensively remodel the mRNA entry and exit site on the small subunit as well as the polypeptide tunnel exit and the putative binding site of the signal recognition particle on the large subunit. The translation factor pY, involved in light- and temperature-dependent control of protein synthesis, is bound to the mRNA channel of the small subunit and interacts with 16S rRNA nucleotides at the A-site and P-site, where it protects the decoding centre and inhibits translation by preventing tRNA binding. The small subunit is locked by pY in a non-rotated state, in which the intersubunit bridges to the large subunit are stabilized.
chloroplast; cryo‐EM; pY; ribosome; translation.
© 2016 The Authors. Published under the terms of the CC BY NC ND 4.0 license.
Figure 1. Architecture of the chloroplast 70S ribosome
Structure of the chloroplast 70S ribosome. 50S subunit proteins are in blue, 23S rRNA in cyan, 5S rRNA in green, 4.5S rRNA in red, 30S subunit proteins in gold, 16S rRNA in pale yellow, E‐site tRNA in pink and translation factor pY in green. Plastid‐specific ribosomal proteins cS22, cS23, bTHXc, cL37 and cL38 are shown in red.
Protein and rRNA elements conserved between chloroplast and bacterial 70S ribosome are in blue and grey, respectively. Chloroplast‐specific rRNA elements are shown in purple. Plastid‐specific ribosomal proteins and additional protein extensions are in red and yellow, respectively. Translation factor pY is shown in green. Structural landmarks of the 70S ribosome are indicated.
Figure EV1. Resolution and quality of the cryo‐
Surface rendering of the final high‐resolution maps of the 30S subunit (A), the 70S ribosome (B) and the 50S subunit (C).
Local resolution plots showing the surface (D–F) and a cross section (G–I) of the cryo‐EM maps. Local resolution maps of the 30S (D, G), 70S (E, H) and 50S (F, I) are shown from the same view as in panels (A, B and C), respectively.
Fourier shell correlation (FSC) curves of the 30S (J), the 70S (K) and 50S (L) cryo‐EM reconstructions. The indicated resolutions are according to the FSC = 0.143 criterion (“gold‐standard”).
Examples for the quality of the density: (M) ribosomal protein (salmon) interacting with rRNA (grey), (N) protein α‐helix (yellow) and (O) protein β‐sheet (green).
Figure 2. Plastid‐specific ribosomal proteins
De novo built and refined structures of the plastid‐specific ribosomal proteins cL37 (A), cL38 (B) and bTHXc (C) are shown in red, with N‐ and C‐termini indicated. 23S and 16S rRNAs in grey and 5S rRNA in green. Alterations in rRNA elements in comparison with bacteria are indicated with dark colour. D
Rigid body fitted models of plastid‐specific ribosomal proteins cS22 and cS23 in red. Helices h6, h10 and h17 of 16S rRNA are indicated.
De novo built plastid‐specific ribosomal proteins
The density indicates clear side chain features and allows unambiguous tracing of cL37 (A), cL38 (B) and bTHXc (C).
Binding sites of cL37 (D), cL38 (E) and bTHXc (F) in the chloroplast 70S ribosome.
Corresponding sites to panels (D, E and F), respectively, in the bacterial 70S ribosome (PDB 4YBB; Noeske
et al, 2015).
Figure EV3. The chloroplast 4.5S ribosomal
Primary transcript of the chloroplast rRNA operon. The canonical sequences of ribosomal RNAs are indicated by coloured boxes. The 4.5S rRNA is separated from the 23S rRNA by a 115‐nucleotide RNA spacer.
Comparison of the chloroplast 50S subunit (B) with the bacterial 50S subunit (PDB 4YBB; Noeske
et al, 2015) (C) indicating the structural rearrangement of the ribosomal proteins that interact with the 23S rRNA (blue) and the 4.5S rRNA (red). D, E
Secondary structure diagram of the chloroplast 4.5S rRNA (D) and the 3′ end of the bacterial 23S rRNA (E). The interactions of the 5′ and 3′ ends of the 4.5S rRNA with the 23S rRNA are shown. Watson–Crick base pairs are indicated by lines (‐), G•U base pairs by dots (•) and non‐standard base pairs by rings (○).
Model of the chloroplast 4.5S rRNA (F) and the 3′ end of the bacterial 23S rRNA (G). The same nucleotides are shown in the models as represented in the secondary structure diagrams (D, E).
Figure 3. The 4.5S ribosomal RNA and its interactions with ribosomal proteins
Position of the 4.5S rRNA (red) at the surface of the 50S large subunit. The 3′ and 5′ ends of the 4.5S rRNA and the 23S rRNA (blue) are labelled. Ribosomal proteins interacting with or in close proximity to the 4.5S rRNA are shown in different colours.
Stabilization of the 5′ end of the 4.5S rRNA and the 3′ end of the 23S rRNA by the plastid‐specific N‐terminal tail of uL13c (yellow). Specific residues of uL13c, uL22c and 4.5S rRNA are labelled.
Figure EV4. The hidden breaks of the 23S
Analysis of ribosomal RNA by agarose gel electrophoresis. RNA was extracted from chloroplast 70S ribosome sample and separated on a 2% (w/v) agarose gel (L: high range RNA ladder; 70S: RNA of chloroplast 70S sample).
Schematic of rRNA processing and assembly in the chloroplast. Because of two specific cleavage sites on the 23S rRNA, called “hidden breaks”, the 23S rRNA gets separated into three fragments: A (0.5 kb), B (1.2 kb) and C (1.1 kb).
Views of the 30S (C) and the 50S subunits (D) from the subunit interface and of the 50S subunit (E) from the solvent accessible side. The rRNA is shown as spheres and coloured according to the elements indicated in panel (B). The positions of the hidden breaks on the 23S rRNA are marked with triangles.
The hidden break indicated with a triangle between fragments A and B is introduced in the connection between helices H2 and H24.
The hidden break indicated with a triangle between fragments B and C is positioned at the stem loop of helix H63. The binding site of the helicase RH39 on helix H62 is coloured black. The electron density map shown in panels (H and K) is low‐pass filtered to 4 Å, and the nucleotides at the hidden break sites are labelled. The exact positions of the hidden breaks on the 23S rRNA sequence shown in panels (F and I) were stated in a previous publication (Liu
et al, 2015).
Figure 4. Architecture of the mRNA entry and exit site
Surface representation of the solvent accessible side of the 30S small subunit. Ribosomal proteins bS1c (brown), uS2c (blue), uS3c (green), uS4c (cyan) and uS5c (red) are labelled, and plastid‐specific elements are indicated by darker colour shades.
Helical extensions of bS1c cluster around uS2c.
Chloroplast‐specific extensions of uS4c and uS5c remodel the mRNA entry site (marked with an asterisk).
Figure 5. Architecture of the polypeptide tunnel exit
Surface representation of the polypeptide exit site (PES) of the 50S large subunit. Ribosomal proteins located around the PES are uL23c (orange), uL24c (green) and uL29c (violet). Plastid‐specific features are indicated by darker colour shades.
Structural differences of the PES (marked with an asterisk) of the chloroplast 50S in comparison with the bacterial 50S subunit. The bacterial ribosomal proteins uL23 and uL24 (both in grey) are overlaid.
Adaptations of putative binding sites of cpSRP54. Corresponding residues involved in NG‐domain binding in the bacterial ribosome are shown as spheres and are labelled.
Figure 6. Plastid translation factor pY
Binding of plastid translation factor pY, shown in lime green, to the mRNA channel of the small subunit. The small subunit is shown from the intersubunit side. The 16S rRNA is coloured in pale yellow, and ribosomal proteins are in gold.
EM density for plastid pY. Secondary structure elements and N‐ and C‐termini are indicated.
Molecular interaction of plastid pY with 16S rRNA. The conserved nucleotides involved in A‐site decoding are coloured in red and labelled (bacterial numbering in brackets). The bacterial nucleotides A1492 and A1493 of the empty 30S subunit (PDB 1J5E; Wimberly
et al, 2000) and of the 70S ribosome in complex with mRNA and tRNAs (PDB 4V51; Selmer et al, 2006) are overlaid and coloured in purple and blue, respectively. Pro127 and Arg119 of plastid pY are indicated.
Superposition of the chloroplast 70S:pY complex with bacterial A‐, P‐ and E‐site tRNAs and mRNA from the crystal structure of the
Thermus thermophilus 70S ribosome (PDB 4V51; Selmer et al, 2006).
Figure EV5. Plastid translation factor
The 70S map with density for pY in the mRNA channel is shown in grey (A) and the empty 70S map is shown in yellow (B). The 70 maps were overlaid using only the density of the 50S. Comparison of the overlaid maps, shown in 30S subunit view (C) and top view (D). The rotation of the 30S subunit is indicated with arrows.
The body and the head domains of the 30S model were independently fitted into the cryo‐EM map of the rotated state. The rotation angle of the 30S body rotation (ratcheting) (E) and the 30S head rotation (swivelling) (F) were measured using PyMOL, and the rotation axes are shown in red and blue, respectively.
Intersubunit bridges are affected by the 30S rotation. A selected residue of each intersubunit bridge is represented as white sphere in the non‐rotated state. The same residues are coloured in the rotated state either in blue, if the contact with the large subunit is maintained, or in purple, if the contact is lost. The intersubunit bridges and the differences between the rotated and the non‐rotated state are described in Appendix Table S4.
Distances (d1, d2 and d3) between backbone phosphates of selected rRNA residues (spheres) in the non‐rotated (white) and the rotated state (purple) indicating a slight opening of the mRNA channel.
tRNAs in the P/P‐ and E/E‐state from a crystal structure of the bacterial 70S ribosome in complex with mRNA and tRNAs (PDB 4V51; Selmer
et al, 2006) are overlaid and shown in blue and purple, respectively. A tRNA (black) was fitted as rigid body into the 70S maps of the non‐rotated (I) and of the rotated state (J).
All figures (11)
Cryo-EM Structure of the Spinach Chloroplast Ribosome Reveals the Location of Plastid-Specific Ribosomal Proteins and Extensions
M Graf et al.
Nucleic Acids Res 45 (5), 2887-2896.
Ribosomes are the protein synthesizing machines of the cell. Recent advances in cryo-EM have led to the determination of structures from a variety of species, including b …
Unique Localization of the Plastid-Specific Ribosomal Proteins in the Chloroplast Ribosome Small Subunit Provides Mechanistic Insights Into the Chloroplastic Translation
T Ahmed et al.
Nucleic Acids Res 45 (14), 8581-8595.
Chloroplastic translation is mediated by a bacterial-type 70S chloroplast ribosome. During the evolution, chloroplast ribosomes have acquired five plastid-specific riboso …
Cryo-EM Study of the Spinach Chloroplast Ribosome Reveals the Structural and Functional Roles of Plastid-Specific Ribosomal Proteins
MR Sharma et al.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104 (49), 19315-20.
Protein synthesis in the chloroplast is carried out by chloroplast ribosomes (chloro-ribosome) and regulated in a light-dependent manner. Chloroplast or plastid ribosomal …
Ribosome Dynamics: Insights From Atomic Structure Modeling Into Cryo-Electron Microscopy Maps
K Mitra et al.
Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 35, 299-317.
Single-particle cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) is the method of choice for studying the dynamics of macromolecular machines both at a phenomenological and, increasing …
The Ribosome Through the Looking Glass
DN Wilson et al.
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 42 (30), 3464-86.
For almost 20 years crystallographers have sought to solve the structure of the ribosome, the largest and most complicated RNA-protein complex in the cell. All ribosomes …
PubMed Central articles
Computational Discovery of Hidden Breaks in 28S Ribosomal RNAs Across Eukaryotes and Consequences for RNA Integrity Numbers
P Natsidis et al.
Sci Rep 9 (1), 19477.
In some eukaryotes, a 'hidden break' has been described in which the 28S ribosomal RNA molecule is cleaved into two subparts. The break is common in protostome animals (a …
An Update on Mitochondrial Ribosome Biology: The Plant Mitoribosome in the Spotlight
A Tomal et al.
Cells 8 (12).
Contrary to the widely held belief that mitochondrial ribosomes (mitoribosomes) are highly similar to bacterial ones, recent experimental evidence reveals that mitoriboso …
The Expanding Riboverse
SO Sulima et al.
Cells 8 (10).
Subverting the conventional concept of "the" ribosome, a wealth of information gleaned from recent studies is revealing a much more diverse and dynamic ribosomal reality …
Ribosome-Associated Chloroplast SRP54 Enables Efficient Cotranslational Membrane Insertion of Key Photosynthetic Proteins
A Hristou et al.
Plant Cell 31 (11), 2734-2750.
Key proteins of the photosynthetic complexes are encoded in the chloroplast genome and cotranslationally inserted into the thylakoid membrane. However, the molecular deta …
Protein Complex Identification and Quantitative Complexome by CN-PAGE
M Gorka et al.
Sci Rep 9 (1), 11523.
The majority of cellular processes are carried out by protein complexes. Various size fractionation methods have previously been combined with mass spectrometry to identi …
Adams PD, Afonine PV, Bunkoczi G, Chen VB, Davis IW, Echols N, Headd JJ, Hung LW, Kapral GJ, Grosse‐Kunstleve RW, McCoy AJ, Moriarty NW, Oeffner R, Read RJ, Richardson DC, Richardson JS, Terwilliger TC, Zwart PH (2010) PHENIX: a comprehensive Python‐based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 66: 213–221
Agafonov DE, Kolb VA, Spirin AS (2001) Ribosome‐associated protein that inhibits translation at the aminoacyl‐tRNA binding stage. EMBO Rep 2: 399–402
Ahlert D, Ruf S, Bock R (2003) Plastid protein synthesis is required for plant development in tobacco. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 15730–15735
Ahmed T, Yin Z, Bhushan S (2016) Cryo‐EM structure of the large subunit of the spinach chloroplast ribosome. Sci Rep 6: 35793
Ban N, Beckmann R, Cate JH, Dinman JD, Dragon F, Ellis SR, Lafontaine DL, Lindahl L, Liljas A, Lipton JM, McAlear MA, Moore PB, Noller HF, Ortega J, Panse VG, Ramakrishnan V, Spahn CM, Steitz TA, Tchorzewski M, Tollervey D et al (2014) A new system for naming ribosomal proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 24: 165–169
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
RNA, Ribosomal / chemistry
RNA, Ribosomal / ultrastructure
Ribosomal Proteins / chemistry
Ribosomal Proteins / ultrastructure
Ribosomes / ultrastructure