Cost Comparison of Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery Training Completed With Standard Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery Equipment versus Low-Cost Equipment

J Surg Educ. 2017 May-Jun;74(3):459-465. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.11.013. Epub 2016 Dec 20.

Abstract

Objective: Training for the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) skills test can be expensive. Previous work demonstrated that training on an ergonomically different, low-cost platform does not affect FLS skills test outcomes. This study compares the average training cost with standard FLS equipment and medical-grade consumables versus training on a lower cost platform with non-medical-grade consumables.

Design: Subjects were prospectively randomized to either the standard FLS training platform (n = 19) with medical-grade consumables (S-FLS), or the low-cost platform (n = 20) with training-grade products (LC-FLS). Both groups trained to proficiency using previously established mastery learning standards on the 5 FLS tasks. The fixed and consumable cost differences were compared.

Setting: Training occurred in a surgical simulation center.

Participants: Laparoscopic novice medical student and resident physician health care professionals who had not completed the national FLS proficiency curriculum and who had performed less than 10 laparoscopic cases.

Results: The fixed cost of the platform was considerably higher in the S-FLS group (S-FLS, $3360; LC-FLS, $879), and the average consumable training cost was significantly higher for the S-FLS group (S-FLS, $1384.52; LC-FLS, $153.79; p < 0.001). The LC-FLS group had a statistically discernable cost reduction for each consumable (Gauze $9.24 vs. $0.39, p = 0.002; EndoLoop $540.00 vs. $40.60, p < 0.001; extracorporeal suture $216.45 vs. $25.20, p < 0.001; intracorporeal suture $618.83 vs. $87.60, p < 0.001). The annual fixed and consumable cost to train 5 residents is $10,282.60 in the S-FLS group versus $1647.95 in the LC-FLS group.

Conclusions: This study shows that the average cost to train a single trainee to proficiency using a lower fixed-cost platform and non-medical-grade equipment results in significant financial savings. A 5-resident program will save approximately $8500 annually. Residency programs should consider adopting this strategy to reduce the cost of FLS training.

Keywords: Practice-Based Learning and Improvement; cost analysis; fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery; laparoscopy; mastery learning; proficiency-based curriculum; simulation training.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Academic Medical Centers
  • Cost Savings
  • Costs and Cost Analysis*
  • Education, Medical, Graduate / economics*
  • Education, Medical, Graduate / methods
  • Equipment Design
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Internship and Residency
  • Laparoscopes / economics*
  • Laparoscopy / economics*
  • Laparoscopy / education
  • Male
  • New York City
  • Prospective Studies
  • Simulation Training / economics*
  • Simulation Training / methods
  • Students, Medical / statistics & numerical data