Background: Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AFib) primarily relies upon pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), but such procedures are associated with significant X-ray exposure. The newer Epoch system has been developed so as to enable more precise magnetic navigation whilst limiting X-ray exposure.
Objectives: This study was aimed at quantifying both exposure time and X-ray reduction with the newer Epoch system compared to Niobe II during AFib ablation procedures.
Methods: From November 2011 to November 2013, our last 92 consecutive patients treated with the Niobe ES (Epoch Solution; 4th generation magnetic navigation technology) system were compared with the first 92 consecutive patients treated using the Niobe II system (3rd generation magnetic navigation technology) for symptomatic drug-refractory AFib.
Results: Mean patient age was 59±11years (20% female), and the study population was affected by either symptomatic paroxysmal (65.2%) or persistent (34.8%) AFib. Median procedure time was 2±0.5h and median total X-ray exposure 12.3±6.4min. Procedure time (1.9±0.4 vs. 2.7±1h, p<0.0001) and X-ray duration (12±4 vs. 15±7min, p=0.001) were significantly lower with Niobe ES than with the Niobe II system. X-ray ablation exposure time was also significantly lower with the Niobe ES system than with the Niobe II system (2.9±2 vs. 4±3.5min; p=0.01). Through multivariate analysis, the only predictive factors influencing both procedure duration and X-ray exposure were found to be the Niobe ES system use and LA size.
Conclusions: Our study was the first to demonstrate that the new Niobe ES magnetic robotic system substantially reduced overall operating, fluoroscopy, and ablation times during AFib ablation procedure.
Keywords: Atrial fibrillation; Pulmonary vein; Radiofrequency ablation; Remote magnetic navigation; X-ray.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.