Gastrointestinal Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants: A Large Population-Based Study
- PMID: 28043907
- DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.12.018
Gastrointestinal Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants: A Large Population-Based Study
Abstract
Background & aims: Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) agents increase the risk of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. We investigated which DOAC had the most favorable GI safety profile and compared differences among these drugs in age-related risk of GI bleeding.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective, propensity-matched study using administrative claims data from the OptumLabs Data Warehouse of privately insured individuals and Medicare Advantage enrollees. We created 3 propensity-matched cohorts of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation with incident exposure to dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or apixaban from October 1, 2010 through February 28, 2015. We compared data on rivaroxaban vs dabigatran for 31,574 patients, data on apixaban vs dabigatran for 13,084 patients, and data on apixaban vs rivaroxaban for 13,130 patients. Cox proportional hazards models, stratified by age, were used to estimate rates of total GI bleeding.
Results: Baseline characteristics were well balanced among sub-cohorts. GI bleeding occurred more frequently in patients given rivaroxaban than dabigatran (hazard ratio [HR], 1.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00-1.45). Apixaban was associated with a lower risk of GI bleeding than dabigatran (HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.27-0.58; P < .001) or rivaroxaban (HR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.22-0.49; P < .001). Rates of events for all DOACs increased among patients 75 years or older. Apixaban had a lower risk of association with GI bleeding in the very elderly than dabigatran (HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.29-0.71) or rivaroxaban (HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.25-0.61). Median times to GI bleeding were <90 days for apixaban and rivaroxaban and <120 days for dabigatran.
Conclusions: In a population-based study of patients receiving DOAC agents, we found apixaban had the most favorable GI safety profile and rivaroxaban the least favorable profile. GI bleeding events among patient aged 75 years or older taking DOACs increased with age; the risk was greatest among persons 75 years. Apixaban had the most favorable GI safety profile among all age groups.
Keywords: Anticoagulant; Atrial Fibrillation; Comparative Safety; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage.
Copyright © 2017 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Gastrointestinal Bleeding and Direct Oral Anticoagulants Amongst Patients With Atrial Fibrillation in the "Real World".Gastroenterology. 2017 Apr;152(5):932-934. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.02.027. Epub 2017 Mar 1. Gastroenterology. 2017. PMID: 28259717 No abstract available.
-
Apixaban may have lower risk of GI bleeding compared with dabigatran and rivaroxaban in patients with atrial fibrillation.Evid Based Med. 2017 Aug;22(4):154-155. doi: 10.1136/ebmed-2017-110764. Epub 2017 Jul 13. Evid Based Med. 2017. PMID: 28705921 No abstract available.
-
In nonvalvular AF, DOAC-related risk for GI bleeding was lower with apixaban than dabigatran or rivaroxaban.Ann Intern Med. 2017 Aug 15;167(4):JC21. doi: 10.7326/ACPJC-2017-167-4-021. Ann Intern Med. 2017. PMID: 28806802 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Comparative safety and effectiveness of dabigatran vs. rivaroxaban and apixaban in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a retrospective study from a large healthcare system.Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2019 Apr 1;5(2):80-90. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvy044. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2019. PMID: 30500885 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness and Safety of Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, and Apixaban Versus Warfarin in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Jun 13;5(6):e003725. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003725. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016. PMID: 27412905 Free PMC article.
-
Direct Comparison of Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, and Apixaban for Effectiveness and Safety in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.Chest. 2016 Dec;150(6):1302-1312. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.07.013. Epub 2016 Sep 28. Chest. 2016. PMID: 27938741
-
Real-World Setting Comparison of Nonvitamin-K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin-K Antagonists for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Stroke. 2017 Sep;48(9):2494-2503. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017549. Epub 2017 Jul 17. Stroke. 2017. PMID: 28716982 Review.
-
An indirect comparison of dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban for atrial fibrillation.Thromb Haemost. 2012 Sep;108(3):476-84. doi: 10.1160/TH12-02-0093. Epub 2012 Jun 28. Thromb Haemost. 2012. PMID: 22740145 Review.
Cited by
-
Apixaban-Induced Esophagitis Dissecans Superficialis-Case Report and Literature Review.Diseases. 2024 Oct 21;12(10):263. doi: 10.3390/diseases12100263. Diseases. 2024. PMID: 39452506 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring bleeding in oral anticoagulant users: assessing incidence by indications and risk factors in the entire nationwide cohort.Front Pharmacol. 2024 Sep 19;15:1399955. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1399955. eCollection 2024. Front Pharmacol. 2024. PMID: 39364053 Free PMC article.
-
To treat or not to treat: a comparative effectiveness analysis of oral anticoagulant outcomes among U.S. nursing home residents with atrial fibrillation.BMC Geriatr. 2024 Jul 19;24(1):619. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05186-9. BMC Geriatr. 2024. PMID: 39030486 Free PMC article.
-
Rivaroxaban Versus Apixaban: A Comparison Without a Simple Solution.Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2024 Jun 11;8(4):321-328. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2024.05.004. eCollection 2024 Aug. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2024. PMID: 38974528 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
Evaluation and treatment of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients taking anticoagulants presenting to the emergency department.Int J Emerg Med. 2024 May 31;17(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12245-024-00649-7. Int J Emerg Med. 2024. PMID: 38822267 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
