Prevalence of Hazardous Occupational Noise Exposure, Hearing Loss, and Hearing Protection Usage Among a Representative Sample of Working Canadians

J Occup Environ Med. 2017 Jan;59(1):92-113. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000920.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of hearing loss (HL), self-reported occupational noise exposure, and hearing protection usage among Canadians.

Methods: In-person household interviews were conducted with 3666 participants, aged 16 to 79 years (1811 males) with 94% completing audiometry and distortion-product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) evaluations. Occupational noise exposure was defined as hazardous when communicating with coworkers at an arm's length distance required speaking in a raised voice.

Results: An estimated 42% of respondents reported hazardous occupational noise exposure; 10 years or more was associated with HL regardless of age, sex or education. Absent DPOAEs, tinnitus, and the Wilson audiometric notch were significantly more prevalent in hazardous workplace noise-exposed workers than in nonexposed. When mandatory, 80% reported wearing hearing protection.

Conclusions: These findings are consistent with other industrialized countries, underscoring the need for ongoing awareness of noise-induced occupational HL.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Audiometry
  • Canada
  • Ear Protective Devices / statistics & numerical data*
  • Female
  • Hearing Loss / diagnosis
  • Hearing Loss / epidemiology*
  • Hearing Loss / etiology
  • Humans
  • Interviews as Topic
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Noise, Occupational / adverse effects
  • Noise, Occupational / statistics & numerical data*
  • Occupational Exposure / adverse effects
  • Occupational Exposure / statistics & numerical data*
  • Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous
  • Prevalence
  • Self Report
  • Time Factors
  • Tinnitus / epidemiology
  • Young Adult