Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Apr;224(4):502-511.e1.
doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.12.021. Epub 2017 Jan 6.

Outcomes in Older Patients with Grade III Cholecystitis and Cholecystostomy Tube Placement: A Propensity Score Analysis

Affiliations

Outcomes in Older Patients with Grade III Cholecystitis and Cholecystostomy Tube Placement: A Propensity Score Analysis

Francesca M Dimou et al. J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Apr.

Abstract

Background: The Tokyo Guidelines recommend initial cholecystostomy tube drainage, antibiotics, and delayed cholecystectomy in patients with grade III cholecystitis.

Study design: We used Medicare data (1996 to 2010) to identify patients 66 years and older who were admitted with grade III acute cholecystitis. We evaluated adherence to the Tokyo Guidelines and compared mortality, readmission, and complication rates with and without cholecystostomy tube placement in a propensity-matched (1:3) cohort of patients with grade III cholecystitis.

Results: There were 8,818 patients admitted with grade III cholecystitis; 565 patients (6.4%) had a cholecystostomy tube placed. Cholecystostomy tube placement increased from 3.9% to 9.7% during the study period. Compared with 1,689 propensity-matched controls, patients with cholecystostomy tube placement had higher 30-day (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.26; 95% CI 1.05 to 1.50), 90-day (HR = 1.26; 95% CI 1.08 to 1.46), and 2-year mortality (HR = 1.19; 95% CI 1.04 to 1.36) and were less likely to undergo cholecystectomy in the 2 years after initial hospitalization (33.4% vs 64.4%; HR = 0.26; 95% CI 0.21 to 0.31). Readmissions were also higher at 30 days (HR = 2.93; 95% CI 2.12 to 4.05), 90 days (HR = 3.48; 95% CI 2.60 to 4.64), and 2 years (HR = 3.08; 95% CI 2.87 to 4.90).

Conclusions: Since the introduction of the Tokyo Guidelines (2007), use of cholecystostomy tubes in patients with grade III cholecystitis has increased, but the majority of patients do not get cholecystostomy tube drainage as first-line therapy. Cholecystostomy tube placement was associated with lower rates of definitive treatment with cholecystectomy, higher mortality, and higher readmission rates. These data suggest a need for additional evaluation and refinement of the Tokyo Guidelines.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cohort selection diagram for patients diagnosed with acute gallstone disease between 1996 and 2011.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Incidence of cholecystostomy tube use in older patients (1996 to 2011) increased from 3.9% to 9.7% in 2010.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Rates of cholecystectomy in patients who underwent cholecystostomy tube placement vs those who did not. Median time to cholecystectomy was significantly longer in those who had a tube placed vs those who did not (4.6 months vs 0.23 months, p<0.0001).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Two-year survival rates in patients who underwent cholecystostomy tube placement were significantly shorter compared to those who did not (35% vs 41%, p<0.0059).

Comment in

  • Discussion.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Apr;224(4):511-514. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.01.006. J Am Coll Surg. 2017. PMID: 28343494 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mayumi T, Takada T, Kawarada Y, et al. Results of the Tokyo Consensus Meeting Tokyo Guidelines. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2007;14:114–121. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yokoe M, Takada T, Strasberg SM, et al. TG13 diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholecystitis (with videos) J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2013;20:35–46. - PubMed
    1. Bala M, Mizrahi I, Mazeh H, et al. Percutaneous cholecystostomy is safe and effective option for acute calculous cholecystitis in select group of high-risk patients. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2016;42:761–766. - PubMed
    1. Byrne MF, Suhocki P, Mitchell RM, et al. Percutaneous cholecystostomy in patients with acute cholecystitis: experience of 45 patients at a US referral center. J Am Coll Surg. 2003;197:206–211. - PubMed
    1. Başaran O, Yavuzer N, Selçuk H, et al. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis in critically ill patients: one center’s experience. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2005;16:134–137. - PubMed

MeSH terms