Outcomes in Older Patients with Grade III Cholecystitis and Cholecystostomy Tube Placement: A Propensity Score Analysis
- PMID: 28069529
- PMCID: PMC5367962
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.12.021
Outcomes in Older Patients with Grade III Cholecystitis and Cholecystostomy Tube Placement: A Propensity Score Analysis
Abstract
Background: The Tokyo Guidelines recommend initial cholecystostomy tube drainage, antibiotics, and delayed cholecystectomy in patients with grade III cholecystitis.
Study design: We used Medicare data (1996 to 2010) to identify patients 66 years and older who were admitted with grade III acute cholecystitis. We evaluated adherence to the Tokyo Guidelines and compared mortality, readmission, and complication rates with and without cholecystostomy tube placement in a propensity-matched (1:3) cohort of patients with grade III cholecystitis.
Results: There were 8,818 patients admitted with grade III cholecystitis; 565 patients (6.4%) had a cholecystostomy tube placed. Cholecystostomy tube placement increased from 3.9% to 9.7% during the study period. Compared with 1,689 propensity-matched controls, patients with cholecystostomy tube placement had higher 30-day (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.26; 95% CI 1.05 to 1.50), 90-day (HR = 1.26; 95% CI 1.08 to 1.46), and 2-year mortality (HR = 1.19; 95% CI 1.04 to 1.36) and were less likely to undergo cholecystectomy in the 2 years after initial hospitalization (33.4% vs 64.4%; HR = 0.26; 95% CI 0.21 to 0.31). Readmissions were also higher at 30 days (HR = 2.93; 95% CI 2.12 to 4.05), 90 days (HR = 3.48; 95% CI 2.60 to 4.64), and 2 years (HR = 3.08; 95% CI 2.87 to 4.90).
Conclusions: Since the introduction of the Tokyo Guidelines (2007), use of cholecystostomy tubes in patients with grade III cholecystitis has increased, but the majority of patients do not get cholecystostomy tube drainage as first-line therapy. Cholecystostomy tube placement was associated with lower rates of definitive treatment with cholecystectomy, higher mortality, and higher readmission rates. These data suggest a need for additional evaluation and refinement of the Tokyo Guidelines.
Copyright © 2017 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures
Comment in
-
Discussion.J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Apr;224(4):511-514. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.01.006. J Am Coll Surg. 2017. PMID: 28343494 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Cholecystostomy: Are we using it correctly?Am J Surg. 2019 Jun;217(6):1010-1015. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.04.002. Epub 2019 Apr 10. Am J Surg. 2019. PMID: 31023549
-
Percutaneous cholecystostomy-tube for high-risk patients with acute cholecystitis: current practice and implications for future research.Surg Endosc. 2019 Oct;33(10):3396-3403. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-06634-5. Epub 2019 Jan 2. Surg Endosc. 2019. PMID: 30604258
-
Index cholecystectomy in grade II and III acute calculous cholecystitis is feasible and safe.ANZ J Surg. 2015 Nov;85(11):854-9. doi: 10.1111/ans.12986. Epub 2015 Feb 2. ANZ J Surg. 2015. PMID: 25644962
-
The Treatment of Critically Ill Patients With Acute Cholecystitis.Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2016 Aug 22;113(33-34):545-51. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2016.0545. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2016. PMID: 27598871 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Timing of percutaneous cholecystostomy tube removal: systematic review.Minerva Chir. 2016 Dec;71(6):415-426. Epub 2016 Jun 9. Minerva Chir. 2016. PMID: 27280869 Review.
Cited by
-
Percutaneous cholecystostomy tube placement as a bridge to cholecystectomy for grade III acute cholecystitis: A national analysis.Surg Open Sci. 2024 Jan 14;18:6-10. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2024.01.006. eCollection 2024 Mar. Surg Open Sci. 2024. PMID: 38312302 Free PMC article.
-
Outcome Predictors of Percutaneous Cholecystostomy As Definitive Versus Bridging Treatment for Acute Cholecystitis.Cureus. 2023 Dec 5;15(12):e49962. doi: 10.7759/cureus.49962. eCollection 2023 Dec. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 38179380 Free PMC article.
-
Endosonography-Guided Versus Percutaneous Gallbladder Drainage Versus Cholecystectomy in Fragile Patients with Acute Cholecystitis-A High-Volume Center Study.Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Nov 14;58(11):1647. doi: 10.3390/medicina58111647. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022. PMID: 36422184 Free PMC article.
-
Computed tomography-guided percutaneous cholecystostomy: a single institution's 6-year experience.Ann Gastroenterol. 2022 Nov-Dec;35(6):668-672. doi: 10.20524/aog.2022.0755. Epub 2022 Oct 17. Ann Gastroenterol. 2022. PMID: 36406966 Free PMC article.
-
Delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for a patient with coronavirus disease 2019 who developed gangrenous cholecystitis: a case report.Surg Case Rep. 2022 Jul 18;8(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s40792-022-01494-7. Surg Case Rep. 2022. PMID: 35843961 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Yokoe M, Takada T, Strasberg SM, et al. TG13 diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholecystitis (with videos) J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2013;20:35–46. - PubMed
-
- Bala M, Mizrahi I, Mazeh H, et al. Percutaneous cholecystostomy is safe and effective option for acute calculous cholecystitis in select group of high-risk patients. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2016;42:761–766. - PubMed
-
- Byrne MF, Suhocki P, Mitchell RM, et al. Percutaneous cholecystostomy in patients with acute cholecystitis: experience of 45 patients at a US referral center. J Am Coll Surg. 2003;197:206–211. - PubMed
-
- Başaran O, Yavuzer N, Selçuk H, et al. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis in critically ill patients: one center’s experience. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2005;16:134–137. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
