Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Nov 25;8(11):3228-3233.
doi: 10.19082/3228. eCollection 2016 Nov.

Consumer Perception and Preference of Drinking Water Sources

Free PMC article

Consumer Perception and Preference of Drinking Water Sources

Seyed Ali Sajjadi et al. Electron Physician. .
Free PMC article


Introduction: Understanding consumer perception of drinking water can contribute to improvements in water management and consumer satisfaction. The aim of this study was to assess the consumer perception of tap water quality and other drinking water sources in Gonabad as a small semiarid city.

Methods: This study was performed in autumn and winter 2013. For collection data a researcher-made a questionnaire consisting of nine questions, based on demographic information prepared. Questions were asked for participants to provide information regarding household drinking water usage and patterns, opinion about tap water safety, taste and reasons for purchasing bottled water. For statistical analysis, analysis of variance (ANOVA) using SPSS version 16 was applied in this study.

Results: Results showed that demographic variables had a significant relationship with consumer satisfaction (p < 0.05). Office employees, women and poor families had the most satisfaction from tap water quality. Peoples' preferences for tap water, commercial softener, domestic softener, ghanat (a type of underground cistern) and bottled water were 27.8, 19, 27.8, 40.4 and 3.5% respectively. Dissatisfaction from production of foam, unsuitable taste, unacceptable appearance and other problems in tap water was 11.1, 95.6, 27.8 and 0.4% respectively. Consumer reasons for using domestic water softeners are: suitable taste (80%), easy availability (71%), economical (56%) and low health side effects (34%).

Conclusion: According to these results it was clear that each consumer group, based on self-condition, prefers using a specific drinking water source.

Keywords: Consumer perception; Tap water; Water quality; Water source; drinking water.

Conflict of interest statement

There is no conflict of interest to be declared.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 2 articles


    1. Kozisek F. Health risks from drinking demineralised water. Nutrients in Drinking Water. 2005:148–63.
    1. Biglari H, Chavoshani A, Javan N, Mahvi AH. Geochemical study of groundwater conditions with special emphasis on fluoride concentration, Iran. Desalination and Water Treatment. 2016;57(47):1–8. doi: 10.1080/19443994.2015.1133324. - DOI
    1. Mirzabeygi M, Naji M, Yousefi N, Shams M, Biglari H, Mahvi AH. Evaluation of corrosion and scaling tendency indices in water distribution system: a case study of Torbat Heydariye, Iran. Desalination and Water Treatment. 2016;57(54):1–9. doi: 10.1080/19443994.2016.1162206. - DOI
    1. Gelca R, Hayhoe K, Scott-Fleming I, Crow C, Dawson D, Patiño R. Climate-water quality relationships in Texas reservoirs. Hydrological Processes. 2016;30(1):12–29. doi: 10.1002/hyp.10545. - DOI
    1. Mohammadi Sh, Mohammadi M, Tavakkoli K, Zamani E, Mohadeth Z, Mogtahedi F, et al. Effects of Different Doses of Simvastatin on Lead-Induced Kidney Damage in Balb/C Male Mice. Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2015;20(4):157–162.

LinkOut - more resources