Sedative Effects of Levocetirizine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies
- PMID: 28070872
- DOI: 10.1007/s40265-016-0682-0
Sedative Effects of Levocetirizine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies
Abstract
Introduction: As a substrate of P-glycoprotein, levocetirizine should not cause sedative effects. However, while cetirizine, a mixture of levocetirizine and dextrocetirizine, can slightly penetrate the blood brain barrier, the sedative effects of levocetirizine are still under study.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the sedative effects of levocetirizine.
Methods: An electronic literature search was performed using Medline and EMBASE from January 01, 2001 through August 6, 2015. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing levocetirizine with other antihistamines or placebo for patients with allergy and healthy subjects were selected. Primary outcome was risk ratio between levocetirizine and comparators. Secondary outcome was change in psychomotor speed. Data were pooled for meta-analysis using a fixed-effect model.
Results: Forty-eight studies of 18,014 patients met the inclusion criteria. When compared to placebo, levocetirizine produced modest sedative effects (RR: 1.67; 95% CI 1.17, 2.38). However, when compared to other second-generation antihistamines, sedative effects of levocetirizine did not differ (RR: 1.23; 95% CI 0.96, 1.58). In subgroup analysis, there was no difference between the sedative effects of levocetirizine and fexofenadine (RR: 1.7; 95% CI 0.59, 4.88), desloratadine (RR: 1.58; 95% CI 0.9, 2.77), loratadine (RR: 1.56; 95% CI 0.28, 8.56), bilastine (RR: 1.17; 95% CI 0.48, 2.84), olopatadine (RR: 1.09; 95% CI 0.81, 1.47), azelastine (RR: 0.19; 95% CI 0.01, 3.68) and rupatadine (RR: 1.47; 95% CI 0.14, 15.72). When compared to first-generation antihistamines, levocetirizine had less sedative effects and less change of reaction time (mean difference: -250.76 s; 95% CI -338.53, -162.98).
Conclusion: Levocetirizine has modest sedative effects with a risk ratio of 1.67 when compared with placebo. The sedative effects observed for levocetirizine are not different from other second-generation antihistamines.
Similar articles
-
H1-antihistamines for chronic spontaneous urticaria.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 14;2014(11):CD006137. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006137.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014. PMID: 25397904 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A review of the efficacy of desloratadine, fexofenadine, and levocetirizine in the treatment of nasal congestion in patients with allergic rhinitis.Clin Ther. 2009 May;31(5):921-44. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.05.017. Clin Ther. 2009. PMID: 19539095 Review.
-
[The effect of 5-days of cetirizine, desloratadine, fexofenadine 120 and 180 mg, levocetirizine, loratadine treatment on the histamine-induced skin reaction and skin blood flow--a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial].Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2006 Nov;21(125):449-53. Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2006. PMID: 17345838 Clinical Trial. Polish.
-
A double-blind, randomized, single-dose, crossover comparison of levocetirizine with ebastine, fexofenadine, loratadine, mizolastine, and placebo: suppression of histamine-induced wheal-and-flare response during 24 hours in healthy male subjects.Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2002 Feb;88(2):190-7. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)61995-3. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2002. PMID: 11868924 Clinical Trial.
-
[Inhibition of histamine-induced wheel after a recommended single dose administration of 10 mg cetirizine, 5 mg desloratadine, 120 i 180 mg fexofenadine, 5 mg levocetirizine and 10 mg loratadine--a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial].Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2006 Nov;21(125):443-8. Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2006. PMID: 17345837 Clinical Trial. Polish.
Cited by
-
Use of drugs not listed in the National List of Essential Medicines: Findings from a prescription analysis by the Indian Council of Medical Research-Rational Use of Medicines Centres Network in tertiary care hospitals across India.Indian J Pharmacol. 2022 Nov-Dec;54(6):407-416. doi: 10.4103/ijp.ijp_878_21. Indian J Pharmacol. 2022. PMID: 36722552 Free PMC article.
-
Old versus new antihistamines: Effects on cognition and psychomotor functions.J Family Med Prim Care. 2022 Oct;11(10):5909-5917. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_77_22. Epub 2022 Oct 31. J Family Med Prim Care. 2022. PMID: 36618177 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy and Safety of Diethylcarbamazine in Treatment of Allergic Rhinitis: A Double Blind Randomised Controlled Trial.Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Oct;74(Suppl 2):1169-1177. doi: 10.1007/s12070-020-02249-2. Epub 2020 Oct 31. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022. PMID: 36452711 Free PMC article.
-
Pharmacological Management of Allergic Rhinitis: A Consensus Statement from the Malaysian Society of Allergy and Immunology.J Asthma Allergy. 2022 Aug 2;15:983-1003. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S374346. eCollection 2022. J Asthma Allergy. 2022. PMID: 35942430 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy and Safety of Bilastine in the Treatment of Allergic Rhinitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Front Pharmacol. 2022 Jan 10;12:731201. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.731201. eCollection 2021. Front Pharmacol. 2022. PMID: 35082662 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
