An open-label randomized control trial of hopping and jumping training versus sensorimotor rehabilitation programme on postural capacities in individuals with intellectual disabilities

J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2018 Mar;31(2):318-323. doi: 10.1111/jar.12324. Epub 2017 Jan 10.

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of a hopping and jumping training programme (HJP) versus a sensorimotor rehabilitation programme (SRP) on postural performances in children with intellectual disability.

Methods: Three groups of children with intellectual disability participated in the study: the HJP group, the SRP group and a control group. Postural capacities were tested with the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and the Tinetti tests. The HJP and the SRP groups participated in the training programmes for eight weeks. Then, all participants were retested.

Results: Results showed that before the training period, there are no significant differences between the three groups. After the training period, the BBS and the Tinetti scores increased significantly in the HJP group and the SRP group with greater extent in the HJP group than in the STP group.

Conclusion: We suggest that HJP training is more recommended to improve postural capacities in children with intellectual disability.

Keywords: hopping and jumping programme; intellectual disability; postural capacities; sensorimotor rehabilitation.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Activities of Daily Living
  • Adolescent
  • Child
  • Exercise Therapy / methods*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Intellectual Disability / physiopathology*
  • Intellectual Disability / rehabilitation*
  • Male
  • Postural Balance / physiology
  • Posture / physiology*
  • Treatment Outcome