Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan 18;8(1):35-46.
doi: 10.4338/ACI-2016-09-CR-0148.

Using Active Learning to Identify Health Information Technology Related Patient Safety Events

Affiliations

Using Active Learning to Identify Health Information Technology Related Patient Safety Events

Allan Fong et al. Appl Clin Inform. .

Abstract

The widespread adoption of health information technology (HIT) has led to new patient safety hazards that are often difficult to identify. Patient safety event reports, which are self-reported descriptions of safety hazards, provide one view of potential HIT-related safety events. However, identifying HIT-related reports can be challenging as they are often categorized under other more predominate clinical categories. This challenge of identifying HIT-related reports is exacerbated by the increasing number and complexity of reports which pose challenges to human annotators that must manually review reports. In this paper, we apply active learning techniques to support classification of patient safety event reports as HIT-related. We evaluated different strategies and demonstrated a 30% increase in average precision of a confirmatory sampling strategy over a baseline no active learning approach after 10 learning iterations.

Keywords: Patient safety; active learning; health information technology; human-in-the-loop; machine learning; patient safety event reports.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict Of Interest

The authors have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Active learning experiment workflow shows an iterative loop requiring human annotation feedback to update a machine learning model until an externally defined stopping criteria is met.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Black solid circles indicate the unlabeled (circles with “?”) samples selected under the two different uncertainty sampling strategies for a binary classification task (“L” circles as “Likely” and “U” circles as “Unlikely”).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
After each iteration (vertical axis), the number of reports where the predicted label switched from "Likely" to "Unlikely" (left sub-graph) and from "Unlikely" to "Likely" (right sub-graph) for each AL strategy.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Charles D, Gabriel M, Searcy T, Carolina N, Carolina S. Adoption of Electronic Health Record Systems among U . S . Non – Federal Acute Care Hospitals: 2008–2014. 2015.
    1. Karsh BT, Weinger MB, Abbott PA, Wears RL. Health information technology: fallacies and sober realities. J Am Med Informatics Assoc 2010; 17(6):617–623. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20962121 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fong A, Ratwani RM. An Evaluation of Patient Safety Event Report Categories Using Unsupervised Topic Modeling. Methods Inf Med 2015; 54(4):338–345. - PubMed
    1. Magrabi F, Ong M-S, Runciman W, Coiera E. Using FDA reports to inform a classification for health information technology safety problems. J Am Med Informatics Assoc 2012; 19(1):45–53. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21903979 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Borycki EM, Kushniruka W. Towards an integrative cognitive-socio-technical approach in health informatics: analyzing technology-induced error involving health information systems to improve patient safety. Open Med Inform J 2010; 4: 181–187. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types