Concordance between Women's Self-Reported Reasons for Cesarean Delivery and Hospital Discharge Records
- PMID: 28100403
- DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2016.12.006
Concordance between Women's Self-Reported Reasons for Cesarean Delivery and Hospital Discharge Records
Abstract
Background: Women's self-reports of whether they had a cesarean delivery are nearly 100% accurate, but there is little extant research on how accurately women self-report reasons for cesarean delivery when asked to recall this information in the postpartum period.
Objective: We compared women's self-reported reasons for cesarean with their hospital discharge records and examined correlates of variability in agreement between sources.
Methods: Data are from the First Baby Study, a cohort of 3,006 women who gave birth to their first baby between 2009 and 2011. Survey data were linked to hospital discharge records. Among women who delivered by cesarean (n = 846), we assessed the probability that women's self-reported reasons for cesarean delivery were confirmed by hospital discharge records (positive predictive value [PPV]), and whether agreement differed by reason for cesarean or by women's characteristics.
Results: Overall, 91% of women reported a reason for their cesarean that was present in the discharge data. PPV varied by reason for cesarean, with high PPV for dystocia, macrosomia, and cephalopelvic disproportion (91.1%), and lower PPV for malposition (81.7%). In multivariable models, women with more education and higher family income had higher odds of concordance.
Conclusions: Despite some variation in the probability that women's self-reported reason for cesarean is supported by the hospital discharge record, more than 90% of women reported a reason that was found in their discharge record. Accurate recall of reasons for prior cesarean may help women and clinicians to manage future pregnancies.
Copyright © 2017 Jacobs Institute of Women's Health. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Impact of first childbirth on changes in women's preference for mode of delivery: follow-up of a longitudinal observational study.Birth. 2008 Jun;35(2):121-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2008.00225.x. Birth. 2008. PMID: 18507583
-
Pregnant women's preference for cesarean section and subsequent mode of birth - a six-country cohort study.J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2016 Sep;37(3):75-83. doi: 10.1080/0167482X.2016.1181055. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2016. PMID: 27269591
-
Measuring coverage in MNCH: validating women's self-report of emergency cesarean sections in Ghana and the Dominican Republic.PLoS One. 2013 May 7;8(5):e60761. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060761. Print 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 23667428 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic review of nulliparous women's views of planned cesarean birth: the missing component in the debate about a term cephalic trial.Birth. 2006 Sep;33(3):229-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2006.00108.x. Birth. 2006. PMID: 16948723 Review.
-
A critique of the literature on women's request for cesarean section.Birth. 2007 Dec;34(4):331-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2007.00193.x. Birth. 2007. PMID: 18021149 Review.
Cited by
-
The Association between Hospital Frequency of Labor after Cesarean and Outcomes in California.Womens Health Issues. 2020 Nov-Dec;30(6):453-461. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2020.07.005. Epub 2020 Aug 25. Womens Health Issues. 2020. PMID: 32859469 Free PMC article.
-
Mode of Delivery Preference Among Pregnant Nulliparous Women.J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2019 Jun;28(6):874-884. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2018.6989. Epub 2018 Nov 9. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2019. PMID: 30412449 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
