Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study
- PMID: 28110982
- DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32401-1
Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study
Abstract
Background: Men with high serum prostate specific antigen usually undergo transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-biopsy). TRUS-biopsy can cause side-effects including bleeding, pain, and infection. Multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (MP-MRI) used as a triage test might allow men to avoid unnecessary TRUS-biopsy and improve diagnostic accuracy.
Methods: We did this multicentre, paired-cohort, confirmatory study to test diagnostic accuracy of MP-MRI and TRUS-biopsy against a reference test (template prostate mapping biopsy [TPM-biopsy]). Men with prostate-specific antigen concentrations up to 15 ng/mL, with no previous biopsy, underwent 1·5 Tesla MP-MRI followed by both TRUS-biopsy and TPM-biopsy. The conduct and reporting of each test was done blind to other test results. Clinically significant cancer was defined as Gleason score ≥4 + 3 or a maximum cancer core length 6 mm or longer. This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01292291.
Findings: Between May 17, 2012, and November 9, 2015, we enrolled 740 men, 576 of whom underwent 1·5 Tesla MP-MRI followed by both TRUS-biopsy and TPM-biopsy. On TPM-biopsy, 408 (71%) of 576 men had cancer with 230 (40%) of 576 patients clinically significant. For clinically significant cancer, MP-MRI was more sensitive (93%, 95% CI 88-96%) than TRUS-biopsy (48%, 42-55%; p<0·0001) and less specific (41%, 36-46% for MP-MRI vs 96%, 94-98% for TRUS-biopsy; p<0·0001). 44 (5·9%) of 740 patients reported serious adverse events, including 8 cases of sepsis.
Interpretation: Using MP-MRI to triage men might allow 27% of patients avoid a primary biopsy and diagnosis of 5% fewer clinically insignificant cancers. If subsequent TRUS-biopsies were directed by MP-MRI findings, up to 18% more cases of clinically significant cancer might be detected compared with the standard pathway of TRUS-biopsy for all. MP-MRI, used as a triage test before first prostate biopsy, could reduce unnecessary biopsies by a quarter. MP-MRI can also reduce over-diagnosis of clinically insignificant prostate cancer and improve detection of clinically significant cancer.
Funding: PROMIS is funded by the UK Government Department of Health, National Institute of Health Research-Health Technology Assessment Programme, (Project number 09/22/67). This project is also supported and partly funded by UCLH/UCL Biomedical Research Centre and The Royal Marsden and Institute for Cancer Research Biomedical Research Centre and is coordinated by the Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit (MRC CTU) at UCL. It is sponsored by University College London (UCL).
Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy in prostate cancer.Lancet. 2017 Feb 25;389(10071):767-768. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30121-6. Epub 2017 Jan 23. Lancet. 2017. PMID: 28126331 No abstract available.
-
Prostate cancer: Improving diagnosis - can MP-MRI fulfil its PROMIS?Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017 Mar;14(3):137. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.13. Epub 2017 Feb 7. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017. PMID: 28169303 No abstract available.
-
Re: Diagnostic Accuracy of Multi-parametric MRI and TRUS Biopsy in Prostate Cancer (PROMIS): A Paired Validating Confirmatory Study.Eur Urol. 2017 Jul;72(1):151. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.02.014. Epub 2017 Feb 24. Eur Urol. 2017. PMID: 28238478 No abstract available.
-
Re: Diagnostic Accuracy of Multi-parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound Biopsy in Prostate Cancer (PROMIS): A Paired Validating Confirmatory Study.Eur Urol. 2017 Aug;72(2):315-316. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.03.044. Epub 2017 Apr 12. Eur Urol. 2017. PMID: 28412064 No abstract available.
-
Re: Diagnostic Accuracy of Multi-Parametric MRI and TRUS Biopsy in Prostate Cancer (PROMIS): A Paired Validating Confirmatory Study.J Urol. 2017 Jul;198(1):101-102. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.04.055. Epub 2017 Apr 12. J Urol. 2017. PMID: 28618668 No abstract available.
-
From PROMIS to PRO-MRI in primary prostate cancer diagnosis.Transl Androl Urol. 2017 Jun;6(3):604-607. doi: 10.21037/tau.2017.04.35. Transl Androl Urol. 2017. PMID: 28725608 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Diagnostic accuracy of the PROMIS study.Lancet. 2017 Jul 22;390(10092):362. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31598-2. Lancet. 2017. PMID: 28745602 No abstract available.
-
Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Shift Prostate Cancer Diagnosis Toward Clinically Significant Disease and Minimize Overdiagnosis (and Overtreatment).Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Dec 1;105(5):915-917. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.09.040. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019. PMID: 31748142 Review. No abstract available.
-
Patient Perspectives and Understanding of MRI-directed Prostate Cancer Diagnosis.Urology. 2021 Jul;153:6-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.03.031. Epub 2021 Apr 3. Urology. 2021. PMID: 33823175 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Multiparametric MRI to improve detection of prostate cancer compared with transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy alone: the PROMIS study.Health Technol Assess. 2018 Jul;22(39):1-176. doi: 10.3310/hta22390. Health Technol Assess. 2018. PMID: 30040065 Free PMC article.
-
PROMIS--Prostate MR imaging study: A paired validating cohort study evaluating the role of multi-parametric MRI in men with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer.Contemp Clin Trials. 2015 May;42:26-40. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.02.008. Epub 2015 Mar 3. Contemp Clin Trials. 2015. PMID: 25749312 Free PMC article.
-
Can multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging predict upgrading of transrectal ultrasound biopsy results at more definitive histology?Urol Oncol. 2014 Aug;32(6):741-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2014.01.008. Epub 2014 Jun 26. Urol Oncol. 2014. PMID: 24981993
-
Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.Dan Med J. 2017 Feb;64(2):B5327. Dan Med J. 2017. PMID: 28157066 Review.
-
The diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance spectroscopy and enhanced magnetic resonance imaging techniques in aiding the localisation of prostate abnormalities for biopsy: a systematic review and economic evaluation.Health Technol Assess. 2013 May;17(20):vii-xix, 1-281. doi: 10.3310/hta17200. Health Technol Assess. 2013. PMID: 23697373 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Patients' anxieties and fears: a comparison between transrectal prostate biopsy and prostate MRI.Transl Androl Urol. 2024 Oct 31;13(10):2201-2208. doi: 10.21037/tau-24-239. Epub 2024 Oct 28. Transl Androl Urol. 2024. PMID: 39507871 Free PMC article.
-
Prostate cancer theragnostics biomarkers: An update.Investig Clin Urol. 2024 Nov;65(6):527-539. doi: 10.4111/icu.20240229. Investig Clin Urol. 2024. PMID: 39505512 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Utility of transperineal template-guided mapping prostate biopsy in biopsy-naïve men with PI-RADS 1-2 on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.Prostate Int. 2024 Sep;12(3):134-138. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2024.04.002. Epub 2024 Apr 20. Prostate Int. 2024. PMID: 39498351 Free PMC article.
-
Optimizing radiomics for prostate cancer diagnosis: feature selection strategies, machine learning classifiers, and MRI sequences.Insights Imaging. 2024 Nov 4;15(1):265. doi: 10.1186/s13244-024-01783-9. Insights Imaging. 2024. PMID: 39495422 Free PMC article.
-
Established focal therapy-HIFU, IRE, or cryotherapy-where are we now?-a systematic review and meta-analysis.Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2024 Oct 28. doi: 10.1038/s41391-024-00911-2. Online ahead of print. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2024. PMID: 39468217 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
- MC_U122861330/MRC_/Medical Research Council/United Kingdom
- 09/22/67/DH_/Department of Health/United Kingdom
- MC_UU_12023/20/MRC_/Medical Research Council/United Kingdom
- MR/L004933/1/MRC_/Medical Research Council/United Kingdom
- MR/L004933/2/MRC_/Medical Research Council/United Kingdom
- MC_UU_12023/25/MRC_/Medical Research Council/United Kingdom
- MC_EX_G0800814/MRC_/Medical Research Council/United Kingdom
- MC_UU_12023/28/MRC_/Medical Research Council/United Kingdom
- MC_UU_12023/6/MRC_/Medical Research Council/United Kingdom
- MR/M009092/1/MRC_/Medical Research Council/United Kingdom
- MC_EX_UU_G0800814/MRC_/Medical Research Council/United Kingdom
- 19727/CRUK_/Cancer Research UK/United Kingdom
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
