Breast Cancer Screening in Denmark: A Cohort Study of Tumor Size and Overdiagnosis
- PMID: 28114661
- DOI: 10.7326/M16-0270
Breast Cancer Screening in Denmark: A Cohort Study of Tumor Size and Overdiagnosis
Abstract
Background: Effective breast cancer screening should detect early-stage cancer and prevent advanced disease.
Objective: To assess the association between screening and the size of detected tumors and to estimate overdiagnosis (detection of tumors that would not become clinically relevant).
Design: Cohort study.
Setting: Denmark from 1980 to 2010.
Participants: Women aged 35 to 84 years.
Intervention: Screening programs offering biennial mammography for women aged 50 to 69 years beginning in different regions at different times.
Measurements: Trends in the incidence of advanced (>20 mm) and nonadvanced (≤20 mm) breast cancer tumors in screened and nonscreened women were measured. Two approaches were used to estimate the amount of overdiagnosis: comparing the incidence of advanced and nonadvanced tumors among women aged 50 to 84 years in screening and nonscreening areas; and comparing the incidence for nonadvanced tumors among women aged 35 to 49, 50 to 69, and 70 to 84 years in screening and nonscreening areas.
Results: Screening was not associated with lower incidence of advanced tumors. The incidence of nonadvanced tumors increased in the screening versus prescreening periods (incidence rate ratio, 1.49 [95% CI, 1.43 to 1.54]). The first estimation approach found that 271 invasive breast cancer tumors and 179 ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) lesions were overdiagnosed in 2010 (overdiagnosis rate of 24.4% [including DCIS] and 14.7% [excluding DCIS]). The second approach, which accounted for regional differences in women younger than the screening age, found that 711 invasive tumors and 180 cases of DCIS were overdiagnosed in 2010 (overdiagnosis rate of 48.3% [including DCIS] and 38.6% [excluding DCIS]).
Limitation: Regional differences complicate interpretation.
Conclusion: Breast cancer screening was not associated with a reduction in the incidence of advanced cancer. It is likely that 1 in every 3 invasive tumors and cases of DCIS diagnosed in women offered screening represent overdiagnosis (incidence increase of 48.3%).
Primary funding source: None.
Comment in
-
Accepting the Existence of Breast Cancer Overdiagnosis.Ann Intern Med. 2017 Mar 7;166(5):364-365. doi: 10.7326/M16-2850. Epub 2017 Jan 10. Ann Intern Med. 2017. PMID: 28114628 No abstract available.
-
Breast Cancer Screening in Denmark.Ann Intern Med. 2017 Oct 3;167(7):523-524. doi: 10.7326/L17-0267. Ann Intern Med. 2017. PMID: 28973197 No abstract available.
-
Breast Cancer Screening in Denmark.Ann Intern Med. 2017 Oct 3;167(7):522. doi: 10.7326/L17-0268. Ann Intern Med. 2017. PMID: 28973198 No abstract available.
-
Breast Cancer Screening in Denmark.Ann Intern Med. 2017 Oct 3;167(7):523. doi: 10.7326/L17-0269. Ann Intern Med. 2017. PMID: 28973199 No abstract available.
-
Breast Cancer Screening in Denmark.Ann Intern Med. 2017 Oct 3;167(7):524. doi: 10.7326/L17-0270. Ann Intern Med. 2017. PMID: 28973200 No abstract available.
Summary for patients in
-
Breast Cancer: Tumor Size and Overdiagnosis.Ann Intern Med. 2017 Mar 7;166(5). doi: 10.7326/P16-9029. Epub 2017 Jan 10. Ann Intern Med. 2017. PMID: 28114656 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Benefit-to-harm ratio of the Danish breast cancer screening programme.Int J Cancer. 2017 Aug 1;141(3):512-518. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30758. Epub 2017 May 10. Int J Cancer. 2017. PMID: 28470685 Free PMC article.
-
The distribution of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) grade in 4232 women and its impact on overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening.Breast Cancer Res. 2016 May 10;18(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s13058-016-0705-5. Breast Cancer Res. 2016. PMID: 27160733 Free PMC article.
-
Obligate Overdiagnosis Due to Mammographic Screening: A Direct Estimate for U.S. Women.Radiology. 2018 May;287(2):391-397. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017171622. Epub 2017 Dec 21. Radiology. 2018. PMID: 29267146
-
Diagnosis and management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2009 Sep;(185):1-549. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2009. PMID: 20629475 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Low-risk DCIS. What is it? Observe or excise?Virchows Arch. 2022 Jan;480(1):21-32. doi: 10.1007/s00428-021-03173-8. Epub 2021 Aug 27. Virchows Arch. 2022. PMID: 34448893 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Screening Programs for Breast Cancer: Toward Individualized, Risk-Adapted Strategies of Early Detection.Cancer Treat Res. 2023;188:63-88. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-33602-7_3. Cancer Treat Res. 2023. PMID: 38175342
-
Overdiagnosis Due to Screening Mammography for Breast Cancer among Women Aged 40 Years and Over: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Pers Med. 2023 Mar 14;13(3):523. doi: 10.3390/jpm13030523. J Pers Med. 2023. PMID: 36983705 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Mechanistic Roles of Sirtuins in Breast and Prostate Cancer.Cancers (Basel). 2022 Oct 19;14(20):5118. doi: 10.3390/cancers14205118. Cancers (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36291902 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A new perspective on breast cancer diagnostic guidelines to reduce overdiagnosis.Prod Oper Manag. 2022 May;31(5):2361-2378. doi: 10.1111/poms.13691. Epub 2022 Mar 8. Prod Oper Manag. 2022. PMID: 35915601 Free PMC article.
-
Mammography screening and mortality by risk status in the California teachers study.BMC Cancer. 2021 Dec 18;21(1):1341. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-09071-1. BMC Cancer. 2021. PMID: 34922473 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical