Benefits and Harms of Intensive Blood Pressure Treatment in Adults Aged 60 Years or Older: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
- PMID: 28114673
- DOI: 10.7326/M16-1754
Benefits and Harms of Intensive Blood Pressure Treatment in Adults Aged 60 Years or Older: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Erratum in
-
Correction: Benefits and Harms of Intensive Blood Pressure Treatment in Adults Aged 60 Years or Older.Ann Intern Med. 2018 Jan 16;168(2):159. doi: 10.7326/L17-0277. Ann Intern Med. 2018. PMID: 29335724 No abstract available.
-
Correction: Benefits and Harms of Intensive Blood Pressure Treatment in Adults Aged 60 Years or Older.Ann Intern Med. 2018 Apr 3;168(7):529-530. doi: 10.7326/L18-0077. Ann Intern Med. 2018. PMID: 29610912 No abstract available.
Abstract
Background: Recent guidelines recommend a systolic blood pressure (SBP) goal of less than 150 mm Hg for adults aged 60 years or older, but the balance of benefits and harms is unclear in light of newer evidence.
Purpose: To systematically review the effects of more versus less intensive BP control in older adults.
Data sources: Multiple databases through January 2015 and MEDLINE to September 2016.
Study selection: 21 randomized, controlled trials comparing BP targets or treatment intensity, and 3 observational studies that assessed harms.
Data extraction: Two investigators extracted data, assessed study quality, and graded the evidence using published criteria.
Data synthesis: Nine trials provided high-strength evidence that BP control to less than 150/90 mm Hg reduces mortality (relative risk [RR], 0.90 [95% CI, 0.83 to 0.98]), cardiac events (RR, 0.77 [CI, 0.68 to 0.89]), and stroke (RR, 0.74 [CI, 0.65 to 0.84]). Six trials yielded low- to moderate-strength evidence that lower targets (≤140/85 mm Hg) are associated with marginally significant decreases in cardiac events (RR, 0.82 [CI, 0.64 to 1.00]) and stroke (RR, 0.79 [CI, 0.59 to 0.99]) and nonsignificantly fewer deaths (RR, 0.86 [CI, 0.69 to 1.06]). Low- to moderate-strength evidence showed that lower BP targets do not increase falls or cognitive impairment.
Limitation: Data relevant to frail elderly adults and the effect of multimorbidity are limited.
Conclusion: Treatment to at least current guideline standards for BP (<150/90 mm Hg) substantially improves health outcomes in older adults. There is less consistent evidence, largely from 1 trial targeting SBP less than 120 mm Hg, that lower BP targets are beneficial for high-risk patients. Lower BP targets did not increase falls or cognitive decline but are associated with hypotension, syncope, and greater medication burden.
Primary funding source: U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Office of Research and Development, Quality Enhancement Research Initiative. (PROSPERO 2015: CRD42015017677).
Comment in
-
Intensive Blood Pressure Treatment in Adults Aged 60 Years or Older.Ann Intern Med. 2017 Aug 15;167(4):288. doi: 10.7326/L17-0287. Ann Intern Med. 2017. PMID: 28806808 No abstract available.
-
Intensive Blood Pressure Treatment in Adults Aged 60 Years or Older.Ann Intern Med. 2017 Aug 15;167(4):288-289. doi: 10.7326/L17-0288. Ann Intern Med. 2017. PMID: 28806809 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Effect of Intensive Blood Pressure Lowering on Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Systematic Review Prepared for the 2020 U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs/U.S. Department of Defense Guidelines.Ann Intern Med. 2020 Dec 1;173(11):895-903. doi: 10.7326/M20-2037. Epub 2020 Sep 1. Ann Intern Med. 2020. PMID: 32866419
-
Pharmacologic Treatment of Hypertension in Adults Aged 60 Years or Older to Higher Versus Lower Blood Pressure Targets: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American College of Physicians and the American Academy of Family Physicians.Ann Intern Med. 2017 Mar 21;166(6):430-437. doi: 10.7326/M16-1785. Epub 2017 Jan 17. Ann Intern Med. 2017. PMID: 28135725
-
Effects of blood pressure-lowering treatment on cardiovascular outcomes and mortality: 13 - benefits and adverse events in older and younger patients with hypertension: overview, meta-analyses and meta-regression analyses of randomized trials.J Hypertens. 2018 Aug;36(8):1622-1636. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001787. J Hypertens. 2018. PMID: 29847485 Review.
-
First-line drugs inhibiting the renin angiotensin system versus other first-line antihypertensive drug classes for hypertension.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 11;1:CD008170. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008170.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 14;11:CD008170. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008170.pub3. PMID: 25577154 Updated. Review.
-
Aspirin Use in Adults: Cancer, All-Cause Mortality, and Harms: A Systematic Evidence Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [Internet].Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2015 Sep. Report No.: 13-05193-EF-1. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2015 Sep. Report No.: 13-05193-EF-1. PMID: 26491756 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
Is Intensive Blood Pressure Control Indicated in Older Patients with Hypertension?Curr Cardiol Rep. 2024 Aug;26(8):783-787. doi: 10.1007/s11886-024-02080-z. Epub 2024 Jun 25. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2024. PMID: 38916801 Review.
-
Optimal Systolic Blood Pressure for the Prevention of All-Cause and Cardiovascular Disease Mortality in Older Adults With Hypertension: Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study.JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Jun 11;10:e52182. doi: 10.2196/52182. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024. PMID: 38861307 Free PMC article.
-
Guideline for the Management of Diabetes Mellitus in the Elderly in China (2024 Edition).Aging Med (Milton). 2024 Mar 29;7(1):5-51. doi: 10.1002/agm2.12294. eCollection 2024 Feb. Aging Med (Milton). 2024. PMID: 38571669 Free PMC article.
-
Risk Factors and Prognosis of Stroke in Gynecologic Cancer Patients.Cancers (Basel). 2023 Oct 9;15(19):4895. doi: 10.3390/cancers15194895. Cancers (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37835590 Free PMC article.
-
Generalisability and potential deaths averted from intensive blood pressure treatment among the elderly population in the US and China: A nationally representative cross-sectional study.J Glob Health. 2023 Sep 8;13:04100. doi: 10.7189/jogh.13.04100. J Glob Health. 2023. PMID: 37681671 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical