Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Feb 1;13(1):206-223.
doi: 10.1177/160940691401300109.

Avoiding Pitfalls and Realising Opportunities: Reflecting on Issues of Sampling and Recruitment for Online Focus Groups

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Avoiding Pitfalls and Realising Opportunities: Reflecting on Issues of Sampling and Recruitment for Online Focus Groups

Nicola Boydell et al. Int J Qual Methods. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

The increasing prominence of the Internet in everyday life has prompted methodological innovations in qualitative research, particularly the adaptation of established methods of data collection for use online. The alternative online context brings with it both opportunities and challenges. To date the literature on online focus groups has focused mainly on the suitability of the method for qualitative data collection, and the development of approaches to facilitation that maximise interaction. By reflecting on our experiences of designing and attempting to recruit participants to online focus groups for two exploratory research projects, we aim to contribute some novel reflections around the less articulated issues of sampling and recruitment for online focus groups. In particular, we highlight potentially problematic issues around offline recruitment for an online method of data collection; the potential of using social media for recruitment; and the uncertainties around offering incentives in online recruitment, issues which have received little attention in the growing literature around online focus groups. More broadly, we recommend continued examination of online social practices and the social media environment to develop appropriate and timely online recruitment strategies and suggest further areas for future research and innovation.

Keywords: Internet; focus groups; research design; research participation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alexander GL, Divine GW, Couper MP, McClure JB, Stopponi MA, Fortman KK, Johnson CC. Effect of incentives and mailing features on online health program enrollment. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2008;34(5):382–388. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.01.028. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Balfe M, Doyle F, Conroy R. Using Facebook to recruit young adults for qualitative research projects: How difficult is it? Computers, Informatics, Nursing. 2012;30(10):511–515. doi: 10.1097/NXN.1090b1013e31826e31824fca. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barbour R, Kitzinger J. Developing focus group research: Politics, theory and practice. London, United Kingdom: Sage; 1999.
    1. Beer D, Burrows R. Sociology and, of and in Web 2.0: Some initial considerations. Sociological Research Online. 2007;12(5) doi: 10.5153/sro.1560. - DOI
    1. Bosio AC, Graffigna G, Lozza E. Toward a theory of technique for online focus groups. In: Hannson T, editor. Handbook of research on digital information technologies: Innovations, methods, and ethical issues. Hershey, PA: IGI Global; 2008. pp. 193–213.

LinkOut - more resources