Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for spinal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 28153830
- DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210597
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for spinal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: While it is now clear that paracetamol is ineffective for spinal pain, there is not consensus on the efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for this condition. We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis to determine the efficacy and safety of NSAIDs for spinal pain.
Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL and LILACS for randomised controlled trials comparing the efficacy and safety of NSAIDs with placebo for spinal pain. Reviewers extracted data, assessed risk of bias and evaluated the quality of evidence using the Grade of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. A between-group difference of 10 points (on a 0-100 scale) was used for pain and disability as the smallest worthwhile effect, as well as to calculate numbers needed to treat. Random-effects models were used to calculate mean differences or risk ratios with 95% CIs.
Results: We included 35 randomised placebo-controlled trials. NSAIDs reduced pain and disability, but provided clinically unimportant effects over placebo. Six participants (95% CI 4 to 10) needed to be treated with NSAIDs, rather than placebo, for one additional participant to achieve clinically important pain reduction. When looking at different types of spinal pain, outcomes or time points, in only 3 of the 14 analyses were the pooled treatment effects marginally above our threshold for clinical importance. NSAIDs increased the risk of gastrointestinal reactions by 2.5 times (95% CI 1.2 to 5.2), although the median duration of included trials was 7 days.
Conclusions: NSAIDs are effective for spinal pain, but the magnitude of the difference in outcomes between the intervention and placebo groups is not clinically important. At present, there are no simple analgesics that provide clinically important effects for spinal pain over placebo. There is an urgent need to develop new drug therapies for this condition.
Keywords: Analgesics; Low Back Pain; NSAIDs.
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Similar articles
-
Efficacy and safety of paracetamol for spinal pain and osteoarthritis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised placebo controlled trials.BMJ. 2015 Mar 31;350:h1225. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h1225. BMJ. 2015. PMID: 25828856 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Are non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs effective for the management of neck pain and associated disorders, whiplash-associated disorders, or non-specific low back pain? A systematic review of systematic reviews by the Ontario Protocol for Traffic Injury Management (OPTIMa) Collaboration.Eur Spine J. 2016 Jan;25(1):34-61. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-3891-4. Epub 2015 Apr 1. Eur Spine J. 2016. PMID: 25827308
-
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for low back pain.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD000396. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000396. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18;(2):CD000396. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000396.pub2 Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23;(1):CD000396. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000396.pub3 PMID: 10796356 Updated. Review.
-
WITHDRAWN: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for low-back pain.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18;(2):CD000396. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000396.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007. PMID: 17636636 Review.
-
Efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for low back pain: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials.Ann Rheum Dis. 1997 Apr;56(4):214-23. doi: 10.1136/ard.56.4.214. Ann Rheum Dis. 1997. PMID: 9165992 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
A Dietary Supplement in the Management of Patients with Lumbar Osteochondrosis: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Study.Nutrients. 2024 Aug 14;16(16):2695. doi: 10.3390/nu16162695. Nutrients. 2024. PMID: 39203831 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Should cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia be considered for preventing and managing chronic pain?Sleep. 2024 Oct 11;47(10):zsae177. doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsae177. Sleep. 2024. PMID: 39093687 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Analgesia for non-specific low back pain.BMJ. 2024 Jun 27;385:e080064. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-080064. BMJ. 2024. PMID: 38936847 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
A new role for spinal manual therapy and for chiropractic? Part II: strengths and opportunities.Chiropr Man Therap. 2024 Mar 27;32(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12998-024-00532-5. Chiropr Man Therap. 2024. PMID: 38539227 Free PMC article.
-
The Emotion Regulation of Acupuncture in Chronic Low Back Pain: A Clinical Neuroimaging Protocol.J Pain Res. 2024 Mar 1;17:817-825. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S450589. eCollection 2024. J Pain Res. 2024. PMID: 38444878 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical