Can patient involvement improve patient safety? A cluster randomised control trial of the Patient Reporting and Action for a Safe Environment (PRASE) intervention
- PMID: 28159854
- PMCID: PMC5537521
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005570
Can patient involvement improve patient safety? A cluster randomised control trial of the Patient Reporting and Action for a Safe Environment (PRASE) intervention
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of the Patient Reporting and Action for a Safe Environment intervention.
Design: A multicentre cluster randomised controlled trial.
Setting: Clusters were 33 hospital wards within five hospitals in the UK.
Participants: All patients able to give informed consent were eligible to take part. Wards were allocated to the intervention or control condition.
Intervention: The ward-level intervention comprised two tools: (1) a questionnaire that asked patients about factors contributing to safety (patient measure of safety (PMOS)) and (2) a proforma for patients to report both safety concerns and positive experiences (patient incident reporting tool). Feedback was considered in multidisciplinary action planning meetings.
Measurements: Primary outcomes were routinely collected ward-level harm-free care (HFC) scores and patient-level feedback on safety (PMOS).
Results: Intervention uptake and retention of wards was 100% and patient participation was high (86%). We found no significant effect of the intervention on any outcomes at 6 or 12 months. However, for new harms (ie, those for which the wards were directly accountable) intervention wards did show greater, though non-significant, improvement compared with control wards. Analyses also indicated that improvements were largest for wards that showed the greatest compliance with the intervention.
Limitations: Adherence to the intervention, particularly the implementation of action plans, was poor. Patient safety outcomes may represent too blunt a measure.
Conclusions: Patients are willing to provide feedback about the safety of their care. However, we were unable to demonstrate any overall effect of this intervention on either measure of patient safety and therefore cannot recommend this intervention for wider uptake. Findings indicate promise for increasing HFC where wards implement ≥75% of the intervention components.
Trial registration number: ISRCTN07689702; pre-results.
Keywords: Cluster trials; Healthcare quality improvement; Patient safety; Patient-centred care; Randomised controlled trial.
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Evaluating the PRASE patient safety intervention - a multi-centre, cluster trial with a qualitative process evaluation: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.Trials. 2014 Oct 29;15:420. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-420. Trials. 2014. PMID: 25354689 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The patient reporting and action for a safe environment (PRASE) intervention: a feasibility study.BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Nov 28;16(1):676. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1919-z. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016. PMID: 27894289 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Improving patient safety through the involvement of patients: development and evaluation of novel interventions to engage patients in preventing patient safety incidents and protecting them against unintended harm.Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2016 Oct. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2016 Oct. PMID: 27763744 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
"Change is what can actually make the tough times better": A patient-centred patient safety intervention delivered in collaboration with hospital volunteers.Health Expect. 2019 Feb;22(1):102-113. doi: 10.1111/hex.12835. Epub 2018 Oct 21. Health Expect. 2019. PMID: 30345726 Free PMC article.
-
The Prevention of Delirium system of care for older patients admitted to hospital for emergency care: the POD research programme including feasibility RCT.Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2021 Mar. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2021 Mar. PMID: 33819001 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
A qualitative study of patient competence for patient engagement in their safety--from the perspective of nurses and patients.BMC Nurs. 2024 Oct 24;23(1):780. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02440-8. BMC Nurs. 2024. PMID: 39448995 Free PMC article.
-
Motivation for patient engagement in patient safety: a multi-perspective, explorative survey.BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 11;24(1):1052. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11495-x. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024. PMID: 39261814 Free PMC article.
-
Patient and family engagement in patient safety in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a scoping review.BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jun 25;24(1):765. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11198-3. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024. PMID: 38918854 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evaluating the content and face validity of Arabic-translated Patient Measures of Safety survey PMOS-30.PLoS One. 2024 Jun 13;19(6):e0304151. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304151. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38870222 Free PMC article.
-
Transitional care for older persons with need of geriatric rehabilitation nursing interventions.BMC Nurs. 2024 Jun 4;23(1):376. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02050-4. BMC Nurs. 2024. PMID: 38834990 Free PMC article.
References
-
- World Health Organization. World alliance for patient safety. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2004.
-
- Thomas EJ, Studdert DM, Burstin HR, et al. . Incidence and types of adverse events and negligent care in Utah and Colorado. Med Care 2000;38:261–71. - PubMed
-
- Wachter RM. Patient safety at ten: unmistakable progress, troubling gaps. Health Aff 2010;29:165–73. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical