Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
, 18 (3), 357-370

Peri-operative Chemotherapy With or Without Bevacizumab in Operable Oesophagogastric Adenocarcinoma (UK Medical Research Council ST03): Primary Analysis Results of a Multicentre, Open-Label, Randomised Phase 2-3 Trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Peri-operative Chemotherapy With or Without Bevacizumab in Operable Oesophagogastric Adenocarcinoma (UK Medical Research Council ST03): Primary Analysis Results of a Multicentre, Open-Label, Randomised Phase 2-3 Trial

David Cunningham et al. Lancet Oncol.

Abstract

Background: Peri-operative chemotherapy and surgery is a standard of care for patients with resectable oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma. Bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody against VEGF, improves the proportion of patients responding to treatment in advanced gastric cancer. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of adding bevacizumab to peri-operative chemotherapy in patients with resectable gastric, oesophagogastric junction, or lower oesophageal adenocarcinoma.

Methods: In this multicentre, randomised, open-label phase 2-3 trial, we recruited patients aged 18 years and older with histologically proven, resectable oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma from 87 UK hospitals and cancer centres. We randomly assigned patients 1:1 to receive peri-operative epirubicin, cisplatin, and capecitabine chemotherapy or chemotherapy plus bevacizumab, in addition to surgery. Patients in the control group (chemotherapy alone) received three pre-operative and three post-operative cycles of epirubicin, cisplatin, and capecitabine chemotherapy: 50 mg/m2 epirubicin and 60 mg/m2 cisplatin on day 1 and 1250 mg/m2 oral capecitabine on days 1-21. Patients in the investigational group received the same treatment as the control group plus 7·5 mg/kg intravenous bevacizumab on day 1 of every cycle of chemotherapy and for six further doses once every 21 days following chemotherapy, as maintenance treatment. Randomisation was done by means of a telephone call to the Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, where staff used a computer programme that implemented a minimisation algorithm with a random element to establish the allocation for the patient at the point of randomisation. Patients were stratified by chemotherapy centre, site of tumour, and tumour stage. The primary outcome for the phase 3 stage of the trial was overall survival (defined as the time from randomisation until death from any cause), analysed in the intention-to-treat population. Here, we report the primary analysis results of the trial; all patients have completed treatment and the required number of primary outcome events has been reached. This study is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN 46020948, and with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00450203.

Findings: Between Oct 31, 2007, and March 25, 2014, 1063 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive chemotherapy alone (n=533) or chemotherapy plus bevacizumab (n=530). At the time of analysis, 508 deaths were recorded (248 in the chemotherapy alone group and 260 in the chemotherapy plus bevacizumab group). 3-year overall survival was 50·3% (95% CI 45·5-54·9) in the chemotherapy alone group and 48·1% (43·2-52·7) in the chemotherapy plus bevacizumab group (hazard ratio [HR] 1·08, 95% CI 0·91-1·29; p=0·36). Apart from neutropenia no other toxic effects were reported at grade 3 or worse severity in more than 10% of patients in either group. Wound healing complications were more prevalent in the bevacizumab group, occurring in 53 (12%) patients in this group compared with 33 (7%) patients in the chemotherapy alone group. In patients who underwent oesophagogastrectomy, post-operative anastomotic leak rates were higher in the chemotherapy plus bevacizumab group (23 [10%] of 233 in the chemotherapy alone group vs 52 [24%] of 220 in the chemotherapy plus bevacizumab group); therefore, recruitment of patients with lower oesophageal or junctional tumours planned for an oesophagogastric resection was stopped towards the end of the trial. Serious adverse events for all patients included anastomotic leaks (30 events in chemotherapy alone group vs 69 in the chemotherapy plus bevacizumab group), and infections with normal neutrophil count (42 events vs 53).

Interpretation: The results of this trial do not provide any evidence for the use of bevacizumab in combination with peri-operative epiribicin, cisplatin, and capecitabine chemotherapy for patients with resectable gastric, oesophagogastric junction, or lower oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Bevacizumab might also be associated with impaired wound healing.

Funding: Cancer Research UK, MRC Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, and F Hoffmann-La Roche Limited.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trial profile
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan-Meier plot of overall survival HR=hazard ratio. Patients still alive at the time of analysis were censored at the time they were last followed up. Survival curves are unadjusted for covariates and the analysis includes all randomly assigned patients.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Pre-defined baseline subgroup analysis of overall survival Hazard ratios (HRs) comparing chemotherapy alone with chemotherapy plus bevacizumab in each subgroup are plotted against the horizontal axis, with a HR<1 favouring chemotherapy plus bevacizumab. Black squares represent the HRs, with their size representing the number of patients in the subgroup concerned. Horizontal lines represent 95% CIs for the HRs (arrows indicate that the 95% CI extends beyond the displayed axis range). The diamond in the last row is the overall HR; the vertical dashed line is to aid comparison of the overall HR with the subgroups. None of the four oesophageal stage IVa patients died, so this subgroup is omitted from this figure. 16 patients with type II oesophagogastric junction tumours did not have a baseline oesophageal tumour stage and are also omitted.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Kaplan-Meier plot of post-operative survival by resection status HR=hazard ratio. Overall post-operative survival times given by the extent of resection, calculated from 6 months post-randomisation until death (to allow for the difference in timing of surgery between the groups). Survival curves are unadjusted for covariates and the analysis includes all patients with non-missing resection outcome data (61 patients with missing data are excluded).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Kaplan-Meier plot of post-operative survival by Mandard tumour regression grade HR=hazard ratio. Overall post-operative survival times given by Mandard tumour regression grade, calculated from 6 months post-randomisation until death (to allow for the difference in timing of surgery between the groups). Survival curves are unadjusted for covariates and the analysis includes all patients with non-missing Mandard tumour regression grade (168 patients with missing data are excluded).

Comment in

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 43 PubMed Central articles

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:11–20. - PubMed
    1. Ychou M, Boige V, Pignon JP. Perioperative chemotherapy compared with surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: an FNCLCC and FFCD multicenter phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:1715–1721. - PubMed
    1. American Cancer Society Survival rates for cancer of the esophagus, by stage. http://www.cancer.org/cancer/esophaguscancer/detailedguide/esophagus-cancer-survival-rates (accessed Feb 8, 2016).
    1. American Cancer Society Survival rates for stomach cancer, by stage. http://www.cancer.org/cancer/stomachcancer/detailedguide/stomach-cancer-survival-rates (accessed Feb 8, 2016).
    1. Ohtsu A, Shah MA, Van Cutsem E. Bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy as first-line therapy in advanced gastric cancer: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:3968–3976. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data

Feedback