Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Aug;42(4):791-796.
doi: 10.1007/s10900-017-0319-6.

Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Racially Diverse Population Served by a Safety-Net Clinic

Affiliations

Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Racially Diverse Population Served by a Safety-Net Clinic

Elizabeth Nagelhout et al. J Community Health. 2017 Aug.

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the US, yet screening rates remain low among minority populations. The purpose of the current study was to identify differences in the endorsement of barriers to CRC screening and to evaluate the association between provider recommendation and CRC screening adherence among Hispanic, Pacific Islander and White patients. This study utilized a cross sectional survey design to identify patient-reported barriers to CRC screening. Logistic regression was utilized to evaluate the association between patient demographic characteristics (race/ethnicity, gender, age), having received provider recommendation, and patient awareness of CRC screening. The study sample was comprised of a diverse population (N = 197); 48% Hispanic, 25% White, 10% Pacific Islander, 4% Black and 13% other races/ethnicity. The median age of participants was 58, yet fewer than 30% were up-to-date for CRC screening. The most commonly cited barriers included fear of test results (27.6%), inability to leave work for a CRC screening appointment (26.9%), being unaware of the need for colonoscopy (25.4%), and lack of provider recommendation for CRC screening (24.9%). Only 16.2% of participants reported that a provider had discussed CRC screening options with them. After adjusting for age and gender, Hispanic patients were less likely to report having had a provider discuss CRC screening options compared to White patients (OR = 0.24, 95% CI: 0.09-0.68, p < 0.05). The findings from this study indicate that patient's perceived screening barriers, lack of awareness and a lack of provider communication about CRC screening options may contribute to low screening rates among minority populations.

Keywords: Cancer screening; Colorectal cancer; Patient awareness; Patient barriers; Racial disparities.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest Dr. Samadder has received a speaker honorarium from Cook Medical Inc. All other co-authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. SEER Cancer Statistics Factsheets: Colon and rectum cancer. 2016 http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/colorect.html.
    1. US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for colorectal cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2016;315(23):2564–2575. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.5989. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Winawer S, et al. Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: Clinical guidelines and rationale-update based on new evidence. Gastroenterology. 2003;124(2):544–560. doi: 10.1053/gast.2003.50044. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cancer Trends Progress Report: Colorectal cancer screening. 2015 http://progressreport.cancer.gov/detection/colorectal_cancer.
    1. Geiger TM, et al. Improving rates for screening colonoscopy: Analysis of the health information national trends survey (HINTS I) data. Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques. 2008;22(2):527–533. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1242460. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources